Their meeting lasted 20 minutes, during which the other
lawyer opined that the case was a good one and then had the client pay $ 1,500 so he could review the file and write a demand letter.
The lawyer opined: «He has created thousands of jobs, is well - respected in many communities and has the leadership and hands - on business experience needed to run New York successfully.»
Some lawyers opined that it may not be «right» to have revealed privileged information, but there was no one around to sue for damages since the client is now deceased.
Not exact matches
Bannon
opined to Michael Wolff, author of the explosive book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, that Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian
lawyer in June 2016 in search of dirt on Hillary Clinton was «treasonous.»
Perhaps he should consult a
lawyer before he
opines about the law?
Hence Bruno Ganz
opines that a truly flawless diamond would be made of pure light before showing the
lawyer what he describes as a «cautionary diamond.»
Heartland
lawyer James Taylor testified before the Kansas legislature in February,
opining that the growth of Kansas» clean energy sector is «punishing the state's economy and environment.»
A
lawyer who discloses privileged information without client consent «would be in breach of his professional duties,» and the Law Society
opines that cases where abuses of LPP are proven are «few and far between.»
«
Lawyers leave no stone unturned when it comes to arguing about costs,» he
opined in one lecture.
As we wrote, some commenters
opined that an affidavit submitted by the detainees»
lawyers by a Pentagon insider about the «sham» nature of the military hearings may have swayed the court to change its minds.
Even perennial law firm value - hunter Mike Dillon, Sun Microsystems» GC,
opines in the article that: «$ 1,000 for very seasoned
lawyers who can solve complex problems doesn't seem to be inappropriate.»
Florida's Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee
opined back in 2009 that it was not permissible for a judge to approve a
lawyer who may appear before the judge as a «friend» on a social networking site such as Facebook.
In the book, Susskind
opines that the traditional legal relationship between clients and
lawyers, which he calls the «Grand Bargain,» has broken down.
Given this complexity, for
lawyers and judges to dare
opine that a certain search term or terms would be more likely to produce information than the terms that were used is truly to go where angels fear to tread.
Repeating Dokumoto's caveat that he or she is not a
lawyer (which doesn't preclude him / her from
opining that most cops «are jerks»), I present the introductory overview video, in all its glory:
It's an obvious feature of practice that a
lawyer's professional interest will generally gravitate towards the big, the powerful, and the rich — there's a business side to
lawyering, after all, (though I'm not yet prepared to agree with those who say, reductively, that practice is a business), and, as a long - gone uncle used to
opine, «It's got ta be fed and it don't eat hay.»
Scott
opines that, for a criminal defense
lawyer, openly proclaiming your availability and willingness to take on a simple case for a bargain basement fee is something to be ashamed of.
Securities
lawyer Thomas Tew of Tew Cardenas
opined that at a minimum,
lawyers would have to show gross negligence — though he didn't specify by whom.
Lawyers, of course, are already weighing - in
opining on the issue.
He says that while
lawyers have loudly advocated for
lawyers to be the ones managing e-discovery projects, others «have
opined that
lawyers are not well equipped for e-discovery project management (much less litigation - support project management in general).»
«The opinion of anyone besides the hearing panel as to appropriate penalty is irrelevant; were another
lawyer or member of the public to testify at the hearing it would be inappropriate for them to
opine on penalty.»
To highlight one particularly interesting essay of the lot, Prof. Ruthann Robson tells her story of being solicited (albeit indirectly) for a contribution,
opines on the detrimental impact that Williams - Yulee could have on the interests of clients and
lawyers, and discusses four cases, some expected (e.g., White and Caperton) and some unexpected (e.g., Shelley v. Kraemer), that should inform the result in Williams - Yulee.
Diamond
lawyers appear on television
opining on issues as diverse as what to do if you injured slipping slip on a sidewalk to legal woes affecting former Mayor Rob Ford and pop star Justin Bieber.
Even if the surgical error was below the standard of care as
opined by a medical expert, the patient and
lawyer must still prove that the error was the cause of the injury or death complained about.
It's this sort of behaviour that sets a Stevens & Bolton
lawyer apart from the average
lawyer - a willingness to
opine rather than simply report...
Some have
opined that this countersuit is intended to send a message to MedMal
lawyers to back off the medical community.
Just as
lawyers need to be sure they understand how technology works before venturing to
opine on its legal effect, so too do engineers need to be cautious before attributing legal effect to their technologies.
, once a
lawyer (or whole firm) gets burned, it will be of little consolation to the insurer / regulator that it declined to
opine on the sufficiency of the SaaS provider's policies, etc., when there was still a chance to guide one of its insured members, from a claim.
This problem also applies to guardians ad litem, frequently a small group of
lawyers or MHPs who are appointed by judges and placed over and over again in the same local group of
lawyers» cases, and who similarly
opine and write reports that sometimes are on the right side and sometimes on the wrong side.
It is a primary creator of the relationship engineering industries, and spawns work for «experts»
opining pro and con, as well as GALs, supervised visitation centers, court - ordered therapists, custody evaluators, parenting coordinators, and all of their respective
lawyers.
Lawyers say don't cimolete one, OREA prpares a template, REBBA 2002 says we need to ask pertinent questions and RECO will not give an
opine either way.
CREA's senior legal counsel is involved, using phrases like «not prudent conduct» and «looked upon by disfavour by the Competition Bureau» and the
lawyers» favourite, «difficult to
opine in short order.»
Note: You have no option with Module 1 of the Data Distribution Facility as clearly dozens of
lawyers have already
opined that to not participate would be anti-CB.