Not exact matches
In a recent column, I wrote
about market
failure as a consequence of lack of consumer information potentially leading to a race to the bottom as high quality
lawyers and paralegals (the «peaches»!)
To be sure, most
lawyers eventually collect all the relevant facts, interests, goals, and concerns of the client; but a
failure to look for, ask
about, and consider the whole system of these factors will make the process unnecessarily inefficient, slowing the development of trust and confidence between the
lawyer and the client, rather than building it.
I will tell you, every time I talk
about ABS to American
lawyers they cite the
failure of the Australian firm Slater and Gordon as a black mark against ABS itself.
Blackmun found that the absence of
lawyer ads hurt the legal profession, holding that «the absence of advertising may be seen to reflect the profession's
failure to reach out and serve the community,» and that many people in need of legal services do not contact an attorney because they worry
about pricing or finding a competent
lawyer.
A blogger's posting
about a
lawyer - couple's lawsuit against their neighbor for her
failure to abate cigarette smoke seepage from her apartment into a common hallway ignited a swarm of flames against
lawyers for their aggressive, obnoxious and money - grubbing ways.
This weird Facebook ownership lawsuit brought by Paul Ceglia has been going on for a while now, but it's noteworthy how many
lawyers have taken on the case and withdrawn — especially given that Facebook is now talking
about bringing actions against prior attorneys for Ceglia based on
failure to report evidence of fraud to the court.
I wouldn't limit it to small firm
lawyers at all but it's rampant in small firm
lawyers that will regularly talk to people who say, «Oh yeah I know I should be doing that but,» and I guess that's the challenge and is one of the things that I think is kind of scary
about the small firm industry is how frequent the, «I know I should but,» becomes a hindrance to success in small firm practice and therefore there ends up being a lot of small firm
failure when there could be success if people would develop some skills, habits, commitment to learning to focus on their business as a business while still being great
lawyers to their clients.
In a 2005 study
about clients satisfaction / dissatisfaction with big law firms, fifteen percent of the respondents said what bothered them
about their
lawyer was «lack of client focus,
failure to listen, non-responsiveness, arrogance.»
failure to warn clients
about the applicable limitation period (this becomes a problem if a client ceases to retain a
lawyer and then misses a limitation period).
In this Episode I Talk
About: Why it's important to choose a niche when starting your law firm; Why Foonberg's book probably isn't something you want to be relying on for all your business questions; The importance of systems and standard operating procedures in your law firm; The role you play as both
lawyer for your clients and owner of your law firm; How to embrace taking risks, success, and
failure to get better every day; and A FREE tool you can implement on your website and blog -LSB-...]
Representation of banking
lawyer in suit by FDIC over
failure of community bank and litigated issues related to scope of attorney's duty regarding due diligence
about borrower.
The things that clients complain
about most with their
lawyers amount to soft - skill breakdowns —
failure to listen,
failure to empathize,
failure to set expectations,
failure to communicate.
The
failure of the motion comes as welcome news to many
lawyers who expressed their concerns
about a system that would remove free choice from the articling hiring process.
If you have any questions
about medical malpractice and
failure to diagnose, or would like a referral to an Illinois
lawyer with experience and success in malpractice lawsuits, please contact us.
There has been a
failure of imagination (on all sides)
about a debate that tends to consider the real experience of people with legal problems only through their possible interaction with
lawyers.
The vendor was 10 per cent liable for the cavalier, careless, wanton
failure to ask rudimentary questions of his
lawyer when noting conflicting information
about on - site parking.