Sentences with phrase «lawyers doing quality work»

Not exact matches

You see, Hillary has spent decades doing the relentless, thankless work to actually make a difference in their lives, advocating for kids with disabilities as a young lawyer, fighting for children's health care as first lady, and for quality child care in the Senate.

Accordingly, smaller firms need to work harder not just to differentiate themselves on a basis unrelated to size, but also to firmly establish that «fewer lawyers» does not correspond with «lower quality.»

Lawyers, including women from Big Law can continue to do high quality work but under much less pressure.

If you can... If I can figure out a way to do better quality work, if I can figure out a way to train junior lawyers to be better, if I can figure out a way to heighten my analysis and get better at quantifying risk and probability and stuff like that, I feel like there's no choice.

When you say our business, I don't wan na separate the business of law from the legal work that we do, because what it is about and one of the points that I was trying to make in that I think people sometimes gloss over or miss is that it's about quality of work and it's about becoming better lawyers.

As voting is fundamental to our democracy, so to is education, and the ABA has done great work advocating for children and our support for providing a quality education to all, and we are promoting this year lawyers getting involved in a right to a high quality education for all children.

As the editor of Canadian Lawyer for almost a decade, and someone who is constantly impressed with the work lawyers do, even I was blown out of the water by the quality of the candidates.

Although it was expressed in different ways from various perspectives, some of the representative comments here included: «work overload [because of] lack of efficient management;» «total hands - off management style that causes chaos for associates and paralegals;» «lawyers who are managers thinking they can direct people;» lawyer managers finding / using time to actually do the management part of their job;» «poor quality of life for associates / poor management by partners;» «indecisiveness / inaction;» and finally, one that constitutes perhaps the cardinal sin, entitling the offender to immediate admission to Dante's innermost circle of Hell: «lack of vision from the top.»

And even if they manage to secure legal services, their problems do not end — they have to contend with arcane and complex court procedures, they receive poor customer service from their lawyer, they question if the work could have been done more efficiently and, as a result, more cheaply, they don't understand the information they are given, they are not able to judge the quality of the services they receive, they receive bills they do not understand, for amounts they never anticipated.

By doing so, you will gain an important insight into the quality of work you will receive from our professional staff of lawyers.

The lawyer's ability to represent the employer outside the jurisdiction in which the lawyer is licensed generally serves the interests of the employer and does not create an unreasonable risk to the client and others because the employer is well situated to assess the lawyer's qualifications and the quality of the lawyer's work.

But even lawyers of the future will have to spend considerable amounts of their time doing the work for the clients, not bathing / drowning in news, however high the quality.

Dedication and quality of work determine whether technology use serves clients or distracts lawyers from doing their job properly.

De-lawyering — setting up processes which facilitate non-legal or paralegal professionals doing work under a lawyer's supervision — could lower costs without sacrificing quality.

To be candid, if the real and potential benefits of providing legal advice include speed of service and reduced cost respectively, to achieve a positive outcome, which has ultimately come about via the use of sophisticated IT / AI at some point during the legal service / problem continuum, and as a legal buyer my main concern is the right result, quality, value for money and / or price (which remains the issue in many instances), and I know lawyers and law firms can now do the work quicker, smarter and more accurately using AI and cognitive computing technology, can I therefore expect my legal fees to be reduced?

The argument that vendors make when they sell us these services is that these databases will make lawyers more efficient (effectively saving the client money by reducing lawyer time spent on a file) and improve the quality of research (which in turn improves the quality of the work done for the client).

Regardless of the potential quality and ethical problems, many lawyers do hire lead - generation firms, and it seems to work quite well for many of those that do.

That is, by our own account, we don't think that all lawyers produce the same quality work.

My best qualities are that I am a person who can work for «difficult, fast - pased lawyers», I get along well with others, and I am always asking other if they need help when I have nothing to do (a great team player).