Perhaps the preternaturally civilized Boskops had no chance against our barbarous ancestors, but could be
leaders of society if they were among us today.
Not exact matches
If the majority
of people fall further and further behind — while others in
society become unbelievably rich — the notion that the most important value in a country is its citizens having the ability to select their
leaders will lose sway.
In fact, the Tanach is very clear to the Jews that the only covenant they have (and will ever have) is the one pounded out between G - d and the Jews on Mt. Sinai (which,
if you read the fine print AND the NT is allowed to be understood / interpreted by designated
leaders in the Jewish
society; Jesus believed those people to be the Pharisees and told his JEWISH followers to adhere to Pharisee teachings... the Pharisees were the honorable, compassionate end
of the theology spectrum in the first century instead
of the bad rap they get from a mis - reading
of the NT (done generally with no comprehension
of Jewish culture or history).
They could propound demands expressive
of pure love and even in some measure embody them, whereas
if the responsible
leaders of that
society had followed them, all order would have collapsed.
The building
of the Church as a community with complex organizational structure, with manifold functions and
leaders, with various responsibilities to the
society around it, can easily degenerate into the building
of religious clubs,
of sororities and fraternities and
of national associations for the promotion
of good causes,
if the understanding
of the Church's purpose,
of its responsibility to God,
of the nature and action
of God,
of man and his history,
of the meaning
of the Church's work in all the complex
of human activity and
of the interrelation
of the various aspects
of its work are lost to view.
If, as a
society, we view our children as an integral part
of our future — the next generation
of parents and
leaders, and honor those who have already served their role as parents — it is our responsibility and in our best interest to strive to find solutions to promote the well - being
of the grandchildren and grandparents who are a part
of a growing trend
of grandfamilies.
If we really care about creating a non-dominating
society, then for anarchists this means the removal
of all
leaders, bosses and elites, and not simply their constraint and limitation.
A number
of civil
society leaders I interviewed related how they would receive funding offers amounting to thousands
of dollars
if they would launch particular initiatives in locations designated by the funder's interests.
The Hansard
Society say the incumbent «caretaker» prime minister has first call on forming an administration: «Only
if the incumbent prime minister fails to put together a deal with one or more
of the other parties, or, after having chosen to «meet» parliament, he loses a confidence motion, will the
leader of the opposition party be invited to form a government.»
The budget, «
if enacted, would significantly damage the nation's role as the global
leader of research and innovation, and would roll back years
of bipartisan support from Congress,» said Benjamin Corb, public affairs director for the American
Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology in Rockville, Maryland, in a statement.
The goal
of this project was to craft a collective narrative from interviews
of 30 global
leaders who represent government, civil
society and business interests — all making the case that deforestation must stop immediately
if we are to protect our planet from the grim realities
of climate change.
In many cases parents, who should protect their children, remain silent
if the violence is perpetrated by a spouse or other family member, a more powerful member
of society such as an employer, a police officer, or a community
leader.
He says he'd like to incorporate leadership development into the high school curricula because leadership training would give youth a «crucial opportunity to discover some
of the most significant growth they will ever experience, and our
society some
if its greatest future
leaders.»
If we forgive those who deceived us for the past sixty - nine years (2014 — 1945 = 69 yrs), then government science may again be a tool to benefit
society as a whole rather than an instrument
of our political
leaders.
The goal
of this project was to craft a collective narrative from interviews
of 30 global
leaders who represent government, civil
society and business interests — all making the case that deforestation must stop immediately
if we are to protect our planet from the grim realities
of climate change.