This story has just completed a blog tour, which included some of the web's
leading book reviewers.
Not exact matches
These
reviewers have tended to assert their interpretive authority, unconsciously making the inference that, because the historical - critical method would not
lead one to say this or that about the
book of Jonah or the Gospel of Matthew, therefore it can not be said.
Second, we must give
reviewers and event organizers enough
lead time to get the
book in their queue, read it, and schedule coverage and events.
Some
reviewers are so sure of their ability to predict where I'm going next that they barely bother to glance at the
book at all, with embarrassing results (check out the journalist who described Coastliners as «another of Harris» sweeping historical epics», or the one who based her entire review of Jigs & Reels on a single story and wrote how «once more, food and France play a
leading role in this feelgood confection.»)
That's why, despite the fact that traditional
book reviewers should probably have changed their submission requirements long ago, when the technological changes in
book publishing shortened the
book production schedule so much, it's still impossible for
book publicists (and for authors who are conducting
book publicity campaigns) to bypass the rules and garner traditional
book reviews without having at least three months»
lead time.
Old school
book reviewers (who still matter), require at least three months»
lead time.
It seems as if many readers and
reviewers really liked this character, but I found her reasoning skills and actions so unrealistic for an 11 - year - old that it
led me to feel the
book was less than stellar.
The only significant criticisms of this
book are from a
reviewer who questions Gregory's interpretation of events - for example, whether it is credible that Katherine
led the defence against the Scots.
The problem is when that compensation
leads the
reviewer to lie about the
book.
Many of her 5 - star
reviewers said the reason they bought her
book was because the attractive cover design caught their attention, which ultimately
lead them to read the blurb, and buy the
book.
Finding early
reviewers to generate buzz upon launch, and leaving enough
lead time to allow them to read my
book
My guess would be that in discounting the self - published
books,
reviewers believe they're saving themselves a lot of time analyzing manuscripts that fall short in one or more of those developmental categories, which would
lead to a bad review.
In many other situations
book reviewers are simply and only
book reviewers, e.g., this review and set of progress comments from Blythe that
led to Kathleen Hale's self - admitted stalking,
leading to the #HaleNo backlash.
Book lovers of all ages will love the All - New NOOK, the Simple Touch Reader ™, which dozens of
leading reviewers have praised as the best dedicated reading device on the market.
I knew she could she handle the structural aspect of writing, but her being a
book reviewer led me to believe she would be the perfect editor to review my manuscript from a reader's point of view.
It allows copies of the
book to reach bookstore shelves before major publicity appears, gives
reviewers some
lead time to prepare their articles, and provides a margin for unforeseen changes in the
book's production schedule.
In this
book,
reviewer Christopher Masters states, Dorazio advanced his belief, perhaps with surfeit of optimism, that «abstract art could change the world... that just as science and technology were destroying the barriers between different cultures, so the new «universal style» would
lead to a «universal civilisation».»