Sentences with phrase «leading global warming alarmist»

Now compound this massive propaganda failure by the anti-growth Democrats with this week's latest climate science news from the world's premier science journal and a leading global warming alarmist scientist: natural ocean oscillations are responsible for Earth's modern temperature changes, not human CO2.

Not exact matches

He withdrew any kind of bipartisan support for an ETS (and more)» «two years ago Canadians gave majority government to Stephen Harper's Conservatives, who were pledged to a sensible use of its resources, so Australians have now elected a government with a pragmatic attitude on global warming» «Led by Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, an attempt was made, by what can only be described as alarmists, to exploit these fires for the purposes of the global warming debate.

What can you point to that will lead any of global warming alarmists that are still left question to question their faith?

If you're not a global warming geek, the point of the material is that we have apparent — and I only say apparent at this point — written admissions of cooking the books, among other nastiness, by the leading names in the global warming alarmist movement.

«NASA's James Hansen is the United States» leading scientific alarmist about global warming.

My criticism of this site and many others is that, in an overreaction to the alarmists» obsession with predicting and controlling the future, most sceptics refuse to speculate on how the politics of global warming will develop, and just assume that the truth will out, that the Emperor's nakedness will become evident, and we can all go back to leading normal lives.

In November, 2015, the three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — wrote a small book titled Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Rather, the alarmists are still trying to convince an increasingly skeptical public that human production of carbon dioxide will soon lead to runaway global warming and climate catastrophe.

Why can't the global warming alarmists lead us by example instead of simply trying to pick our pockets?

To that end, they are ramping up the dire climate forecasts, even as more and more scientists jump off of the global - warming bandwagon and leading alarmists admit there is no evidence of global warming over the past 17 years.

Instead of publicly expressing their views, a group of parliamentarians said skeptics should parrot the imploding official narrative: The notion that global warming, which even leading alarmists admit has been on «pause» for 17 years in defiance of every UN climate model, is caused by human activities and requires planetary carbon taxes and more government control.

Well, at least the global warming alarmists will have a non-human scapegoat to blame for their misunderstanding of climate science that led to their environmental psychosis.

But nothing like the catastrophe we have been led to believe, with many alarmists claiming there would be an ice - free arctic last summer due to global warming (in fact, much of the big decline in 2007 was due to changes in wind patterns, not temperature).