The man was David Chalmers, one of the world's
leading philosophers of the mind.
A knowledge of the aporias in which Whitehead finds himself on the individual levels of the development of his cosmology allows us further to comprehend why many
leading philosophers of his time stopped taking an interest in his theory and quit discussing his writings.
Not exact matches
«The German
philosopher Hermann von Keyserling wrote in the epigraph to his 1919 book «The Travel Diary of a Philosopher,» «The shortest path to oneself leads around the wo
philosopher Hermann von Keyserling wrote in the epigraph to his 1919 book «The Travel Diary
of a
Philosopher,» «The shortest path to oneself leads around the wo
Philosopher,» «The shortest path to oneself
leads around the world.»
Just brilliant and in total agreement with the
leading philosopher / political theorist
of the 20th Century, Eric Voegelin, who opposed pathological ideologies (Socialism, National Socialism, Communism, Fascism), though I doubt he considered «localism and traditionalism,» at least in the FPR «sense,» to be radical pathologies.
Bertrand Russell -
philosopher, logician and
leading atheist - was clearly a brilliant man, and he's famous for his «celestial teapot» argument regarding the burden
of proof: «Nobody can prove that there is not between the Earth and Mars a china teapot revolving in an elliptical orbit, but nobody thinks this sufficiently likely to be taken into account in practice.
In the latter book Whitehead recognizes the danger that his earlier rise
of «perception» can
lead into confusion, and he acknowledges «that it may be advisable for
philosophers to confine the word «perception»» to «experiential functions which arise directly from stimulation
of the various bodily sense - organs» (AI 229).
Historians
of the French Revolution have debated the point as to whether or not it was the ideas
of the
philosophers concerning human rights, equality, justice, democracy, freedom or the interests
of the ordinary people pinched in belly and pocketbook that
led to the uprising
of 1789.
This starting point will
lead the
philosopher to the consideration
of many questions ordinarily not treated by Christian theology and to the omission
of many questions usually treated by theology.
Scotus calls St. Paul the Christian
philosopher and seeks in his philosophy to find a balance between Augustinianism and Aristotelianism in such a way that he often agrees with Aquinas but sometimes disagrees where therigour
of his thinking
leads him in other directions.
Whatever theologians and
philosophers have dreamt
of in their theories, Christian artists have typically followed John's
lead in portraying a cruciform beauty.
Indeed, the overwhelming consensus among mathematicians who work with transfinites is that transfinite mathematics entails no ontological commitment.4 In fact, when Platonic realism or Russellian logicism (which holds to the extra-mental reality
of infinite sets) are employed as interpretations
of infinite sets, we open the door to the very antinomies and problematics, such as the Burali - Forti antinomy and Russell's difficulty with sets and impredicative definitions, which have
led mathematicians and
philosophers of mathematics to new interpretations
of set theory such as the axiomatic.
His resignation from the Harvard philosophy department (and total retirement from university life) where he had graduated and taught from 1899 was the source
of some distress to American
philosophers who had regarded him as one
of the
leading figures in a distinctively American tradition,
The intuition that I, with my conscious experience, am an actual individual with the power
of self - determination, to make decisions and to cause my body to do my bidding, is reconciled with the equally strong sense that my body is real, and that it exerts powerful causation upon me, in terms
of the speculative hypothesis that all actual occasions are occasions
of experience, so that interaction
of body and mind is not the unintelligible interaction
of unlikes (the unintelligibility
of which has
led philosophers to deny the distinct actuality either
of the mind or
of the body).
This is not to be the object
of criticism, for all welcome the attention and notoriety it brings and the realization that it usually
leads to improved solutions to the problems faced by the community
of philosophers.
Despite the fact that
leading process theists have devoted a substantial part
of their writings to the discussion
of evil, we find publication after publication by
philosophers on the problem
of...
The Relevance
of Cosmic Unity In the
lead letter
of the same issue
of Philosophy Now the prominent anti-reductionist
philosopher of ethics and
of science Mary Midgely makes a point often made by Edward Holloway (though he might not have used the word «choice»), namely that «simple logic surely shows that natural selection can not be the universal explanation because «selection» only makes sense a clearly specified range
of choices — an idea to which far too little attention has been given.»
«Our age is in need
of a great
philosopher; one who can thread his way, step by step, through the intricate labyrinth
of reasoning into which scientists have been
led, eyes riveted to earth... one who can keep his mind, at the same time, open to the metaphysical implications
of all he learns, and at last put the whole corpus
of our knowledge together in one grand synthesis... He must at once be a Thomist and an Atomist; until that reconciliation is attempted, the pulpit and the laboratory will be forever at cross-purposes.»
He has certainly had the misfortune
of being too often labelled the «
leading exponent
of Whitehead,» whereas in fact Hartshorne is a significant
philosopher - theologian who evolved his own principal positions prior to his contact with Whitehead.
Charles Hartshorne, the most gifted interpreter
of Whitehead and the
leading philosopher / theologian
of process theology, asks in A Natural Theology for Our Time, «What is the religious sense
of god?»
I profoundly disagree with his desire to deontologize religious faith; I think that this tendency following the
lead of 19th - century
philosopher Ludwig Feuerbach in reducing the transcendent to secular concerns, profoundly misconstrues the essential genius
of faith — at least Christian faith.
Our age is in need
of a great
philosopher; one who can thread his way, step by step, through the intricate labyrinth
of reasoning into which scientists have been
led, eyes riveted to earth, by the desire to improve our human lot, the desire to destroy life, or mere common curiosity; one who can keep his mind, at the same time, open to the metaphysical implications
of all he learns, and at last put the wholecorpus
of our knowledge together in one grand synthesis.
The man Time credited more than any other for this turnabout was «America's
leading orthodox Protestant
philosopher of God, Alvin Plantinga.»
He was an assistant
of Whitehead at Harvard, since when he has become the
leading process
philosopher.
And this
leads us to the views
of philosophers and to the central and ever - present problem
of reductionism.
The inevitable distortions and sloganizing
of politics
led the
philosopher R. G. Collingwood to argue that a society needs its artists as well as its politicians.
By and large the analytic
philosophers who have
led the resurgence
of interest in the philosophy
of religion have shown little interest in either fideism or the often - skeptical themes
of Continental philosophy (they have shown somewhat more interest in process theology).
This kind
of consideration has even
led some
philosophers to urge the acceptance
of scientific claims where acceptance involves no belief about the truth or probable truth
of the statement itself.
One
of the
philosophers who has devoted extensive attention to the concept
of supervenience in relation to the problem
of mental action is Jaegwon Kim, who has been considered one
of the
leading analysts
of the concept, especially since the publication in 1993
of a collection
of his essays as Superveniece and Mind (henceforth SM).
For this
philosopher, «our intuitions»
led us inexorably down a single path, at the end
of which, once medical advances made it physically possible, men should give birth to children.
In the 1960s, Flew was one
of the world's
leading atheist
philosophers.
In the
philosopher's own words, his thought, early and late, has
led him to «a permanent mistrust
of the pretensions
of the subject in posing itself as the foundation
of its own meaning.
These
philosophers also believed that people were basically virtuous; they supposed that improved standards
of living, and habits rationally modified by knowledge, would
lead to gradually rising moral standards in society.
Its modern development in the light
of science is largely the work
of Alfred North Whitehead and those process
philosophers and theologians who have taken their
lead from him.
Curiously, for many years the main interaction with
philosophers working in an Anglo - American mode has been through the active participation
of Dutch
philosophers of religion,
led by Vincent Brummer, in the Society for the Study
of Theology.
Here, if you like, is a man who, over a long period
of time, has followed a certain scientific method and laboriously gained his results, who says to us: «Experience, with the help
of reasoning,
leads to this point; scientific knowledge begins here and ends there; such are my conclusions»; and the
philosopher would have the right to answer: «Very well, leave it to me, and I'll show you what I can do with it!
It does not matter whether one is by God's providential decree placed in the role
of politician, engaged in public action for the common good, or in the role
of a lover
of wisdom (
philosopher), engaged as a private person in contemplation
of eternal truths, or in some combination
of the two: «A man can still
lead a life
of faith in any
of these three lives and reach the eternal rewards.
If Charles Hartshorne has been the
leading process
philosopher to articulate the rationalist perspective, Schubert Ogden has been the central thinker to contend for the necessity
of metaphysical analysis for theological reflection through the development
of his notions
of faith, religion and theology.
For those who rest easily and uncritically within the uses
of language in the Christian community, the kinds
of questions posed by the
philosophers of language may
lead to uneasiness and therefore rejection, or the questions may not even be considered.
Philosopher AC Grayling lectures on humanism, while 40
leading women poets and performers read the whole
of Sylvia Plath's celebrated work Ariel.
Both William Olaf Stapledon, early twentieth century
philosopher and science fiction author, and Professor Sir David Weatherall, distinguished medical scientist, have strong ties to Liverpool; and Birmingham has historically been home to a wide range
of humanist thinkers like John Baskerville, nineteenth century avowed atheist and renown printer, Harold Blackham, first director
of the BHA; George Holyoake, nineteenth century writer who coined the term «secularism», sex education pioneer Martin Cole,
leading international humanist and
philosopher - physicist Sir Harry Stopes - Roe; and writer and comedian Natalie Haynes.
The story begins with the first ideas
of the early Greek
philosophers — Thales, Pythagoras, Democritus and others —
leading to the theory
of the four elements
of Plato and Aristotle.
Philosophers long ago suggested that awe binds people together, explains
lead author Paul Piff, an assistant professor
of psychology and social behavior at the University
of California, Irvine, who began his investigation
of awe in Dacher Keltner's lab at the University
of California, Berkeley.
This idea
of the homunculus
led me to Tufts University
philosopher Daniel Dennett and his criticism
of what he calls the Cartesian theater — the notion that consciousness occurs at a single place in the brain, symbolized by a small person within it receiving all sensory input and issuing commands.
It predates the theory
of evolution and over the centuries has been
led by priests and physicians,
philosophers and physicists.
It is as if Saccharomyces cerevisiae has found the
philosopher's stone but instead
of changing
lead to gold, it turns noncoding DNA into a gene that codes for a partially structured protein.
The septuagenarian Hegelian
philosopher writes in his book
of being in the world capital
of romance (Paris) and everywhere coming across posters for Meetic, which styles itself as Europe's
leading online dating agency.
The star, Baird Whitlock (George Clooney, «Tomorrowland»), has been abducted by a couple
of extras who take them with their true captors, a group
of communist writers (
led by the epically inconsistent communist
philosopher Herbert Marcuse) that call itself «The Future.»
Jay falls in with a German writer -
philosopher fancy - camping his way across the frontier and is stalked by a coed / multiethnic gang
of bounty hunters
led by the crude, absinthe - loving Payne (Ben Mendelsohn).
There is a community
of thinkers from social psychologists to moral
philosophers who have emphasized that the caring, courage, and compassion that
lead to trust are fundamental to what it is to be human.
A collaboration between an award - winning novelist and a
leading environmental
philosopher, Love in the Anthropocene taps into our corrupted environment to investigate a future bereft
of natural environments.