Sentences with phrase «leading questions such»

Switch off defensiveness and avoid asking leading questions such as, «You don't want to become known as the difficult person in the office, do you?»

Avoid asking leading questions such as, «You don't want to become known as the difficult person in the office, do you?»

Not exact matches

It mostly contradicts the way they covered the election while it was underway [and] it puts a fair amount of emphasis on news events such as the Comey letter, which leads to questions about how those stories were covered.

And now, the head of a leading Chinese glass maker making the same move has openly questioned if his country really is such a lucrative destination for offshore factories, reports Hong Kong newspaper the South China Morning Post.

He says: «Such a broad, vague statement can not guide the design of specific questions, and often leads to long, unfocused surveys and, ultimately, poor survey results.»

This may lead you to ask such questions as: Are open - toed shoes a no - go?

(Last week, Fortune questioned the strategy of giving workers unlimited leave since such an open - ended option can lead to confusion.)

Sevigny said as social media continues to increase its presence with public commentary on matters such as Question Period — which doesn't just rely on mainstream media for coverage anymore in a sea of tweets — it may lead to a change in behaviour of MPs as they attempt to come across in a warmer light to a broader reporting audience.

It consisted of dozens of questions often used by psychology researchers to assess personality, such as whether the respondent prefers to be alone, tries to lead others and loves large parties (the answer choices range from «disagree strongly» to «agree strongly»).

Gently lead and guide buyers toward your way of thinking by making statements regarding your product or service, then tying them down with tie - down questions such as «isn't it?»

It shows that assertions questioning the capacity of the FEDERAL government to pay for programs, usually prefaced with the call for â $ ˜â $ ˜adult conversationsâ $ ™ â $ ™, and couched in terms such as fiscal sustainability, solvency, and unfunded liabilities, are red - herrings that will lead to needless reductions and privatizations of public programs in health care, elder care, pensions and so on.»

For an international marketer, the needs assessment might lead to the development of questions such as:

And if such an attitude sounds unthinkable politically, let me ask this question: Â how many commentators would have predicted two years ago that a Stephen Harper minority government would be able to have a $ 56 - billion - dollar deficit and still maintain a comfortable lead in the polls?

Eventually, as he told me, he was also led to see that other writers had dealt with such questions too, and had answered them in somewhat different ways.

Unfortunately for you, not only is there absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support any of these claims, the existence of any such God leads to numerous questions and apparent inconsistencies for which none of you can provide convincing answers.

All these questions can not be treated here, and not only for reasons of time; for though they are very important for the history of theology, they lead into such a tangle of theological subtle - ties that they can not be expected greatly to advance the ecumenical cause.

Thus, the fact of religiously grounded liberty, when confronted with concrete, social conditions, leads directly to the question of how such liberty ought to be ordered.

I found myself simply asking a few leading questions, such as «What do you want to be free from?»

In each case, what makes the inquiry theological is the leading question, which in each case is one dimension of theological inquiry as such.

And that is the point of my argument; the standard theological version of process philosophy — Whitehead with God — leads me to ask such questions, leads me to wonder why such senseless, absurd disasters have plagued us at every step of our history, and this counts strongly against the centered version of process metaphysics.

These books lead us to ask such questions and encourage us to seek the answers.

In such a situation the providential call assumes increased importance, for the question the Church raises through its various agencies is which young men and women have been endowed by God with the spiritual, moral and intellectual qualities necessary to this work, which of them through the guidance of their lives have been led by God toward the ministry, which of them it ought therefore to call.

Stories questioning the safety of football have appeared in such leading publications as the New York Times (with Alan Schwarz covering the issue in depth), NPR, GQ, and The Atlantic, though the issue has struggled to penetrate the broader national consciousness.

One could cite many possible causes: modern biology led some to question the possibility that the human brain could ever «contain» such an unimaginable breadth of knowledge; or more commonly, many theologians argued that Christ's genuine humanity is somehow undermined if he shares in the Father's own self - knowledge.

For example, in a recent analysis published in an edition of International Studies in Catholic Education dedicated to the question of whether there can be such a thing as a Catholic curriculum, Therese D'Orsa argues from the Australian experience that «attempts to give meaning to the concept of a Catholic curriculum... have ranged across a spectrum familiar to those who lead in Catholic schools» and that such initiatives have had a «limited impact».

This is why it is always wise to responds to such people with as much grace and dignity as you can muster, for your response to them in this way might be just the thing that helps them see that it is okay to question tradition and follow the Spirit's leading away from institutional religion.

The question in fact arises how it is possible to conceive the development of a being that consists in producing as its term something that is higher than itself, or at least leads towards such self - transcendence.

The elimination of such vast numbers of reputed sayings of the prophet has led Western scholars to question seriously the validity of any of them.

Whitehead assumed that the commitment to rationality at this secondary level was such that the breakdown of the program would lead to a deeper rationality, that is, to raising again more ultimate questions about the reality that could no longer be pictured as a machine.

To put such a question to the man that is so busy in his earthly work, and outside of this in joining the crowd in its noisemaking, would be folly that would lead only to fresh folly — through the answer.

The history of religions» inquiry into the «meaning» of religious phenomena leads one to questions of a philosophical and metaphysical nature, but the history of religions as such can not deal with those questions philosophically.

On the other hand, all historical research worth the name leads simply in the pursuit of its precision work to the question of decision, (I deliberately avoid such formulations as «the question of truth» or «the question of valuation».)

With such people seekignto cntrol who we elect to lead us, perhaps the better question should be, «How much longer do you think our planet will last?»!

These questions lead to another, in some ways just as important: why is Meilaender's book such a curiosity?

Anyone who proclaimed, as Jesus did, the imminent arrival of the Kingdom of God, or revealed the forces of this Kingdom already active in the present, or led his followers to Jerusalem, as the scene of decisive action such a leader had to face the question whether he himself was going to be the Promised One.

But I'm not here to gloat, promise; I, too, was bone - chilled, quietly resentful of people anywhere that their face didn't freeze within half a block of their apartment and questioning all of the life choices that had led me to take up residence in such a place just a few days ago.

Whilst it is never wise to jump to conclusions you have to ask yourself why would Arsene say such things or more importantly why would he place himself in a situation by even bothering to answer these kind of leading questions?

Many observers question why Ramos is held in such high regard and his propensity to be on the scene when chaos descends leads the reasons why.

My experience with the Newcastle football team in Oklahoma leads me to believe that, as long as impact sensors are strictly used for the limited purpose of providing real - time impact data to qualified sideline personnel, not to diagnose concussions, not as the sole determining factor in making remove - from - play decisions, and not to replace the necessity for observers on the sports sideline trained in recognizing the signs of concussion and in conducting a sideline screening for concussion using one or more sideline assessment tests for concussion (e.g. SCAT3, balance, King - Devick, Maddocks questions, SAC)(preferably by a certified athletic trainer and / or team physician), and long as data on the number, force, and direction of impacts is only made available for use by coaches and athletic trainers in a position to use such information to adjust an athlete's blocking or tackling tec hnique (and not for indiscriminate use by those, such as parents, who are not in a position to make intelligent use of the data), they represent a valuable addition to a program's concussion toolbox and as a tool to minimize repetitive head impacts.

Reports such as these often lead people to question what foods are actually safe these days — and specifically with rice — can we still eat it?

The face to UK government of the world's sixth most valuable company, Lambert is responsible for leading Microsoft's government affairs activity, facing questioning from select committees on isues such as internet security and violent video games.

As you indicate, we will ultimately need to wait for the Supreme Court to weigh in on such a question, but some analysis of our own can lead to a reasonable understanding of the argument that might be made.

There are no straightforward answers to such questions, but the potential benefits will fuel future discussions, which could hopefully lead to societal agreement about data for policy.

On no other question did the Conservatives have such a large lead.

The finding has led many analysts to question whether the government recent anti-immigration initiatives, such as the so - called «racist vans» and spot checks by UK Border Agency staff, might do more damage than good to the Tories» election strategy.

The question, debated in places such as the Public Accounts Committee, has led to proposed reforms by the OECD, that have been accepted by the G20 and many others, in corporate tax regimes around the world in relation to how profits are calculated and allocated to activity.

That will lead some MPs to question the wisdom of bringing the former Cabinet minister back into such a prominent position as an economic policy spokesman.

So, comments in this question mentioning extremes such as «nobody voted in election at all», led me to wonder:

After a series of damaging news stories such as Corbyn's questioning of the shoot - to - kill policy for terrorists, ComRes now gives the Conservatives a 15 - point lead over Labour.

POLL FINDINGS On the economy and jobs On key questions such as which party would be best for Britain's economy, 33 per cent believed the Conservatives would be best, also a two point lead over Labour.