There are a number of interesting presentations and videos to watch of
leading scientists discussing the issues at the meeting website.
Not exact matches
«Our «GFIdeas» project brings together 205 potential entrepreneurs and
scientists, 111 of whom collaborate regularly via a GFI - facilitated Slack team, and many of whom join monthly GFI -
led video calls to meet,
discuss, brainstorm, and share updates.»
«Our «GFIdeas» project brings together 205 potential entrepreneurs and
scientists, 111 of whom collaborate regularly via a GFI - facilitated Slack team, and many of whom join monthly GFI -
led video calls to meet,
discuss, brainstorm, and share updates.»
Leading scientists reviewed both basic and clinical research and
discussed factors that influence child development from birth to two - years old, helping us understand what to look for, how to interpret what we observe, and what, if anything, can be done to intervene if something goes «wrong.»
Leading scientists from around the world convened this week at the International Congress for Conservation Biology in Cartagena, Colombia, to
discuss how to better leverage science to combat illegal wildlife trade — both within countries and across international borders.
In a research paper «Complex replacement of invasive congeners may relax impact on native species: interactions among zebra, quagga, and native unionid mussels,»
lead author Lyubov E. Burlakova, research
scientist with the Great Lakes Center
discusses the importance of understanding those interactions.
Francesco Panerai of Analytical Mechanical Associates Inc., a materials
scientist leading a series of X-ray experiments at Berkeley Lab for NASA Ames Research Center,
discusses a 3 - D visualization (shown on screens) of a heat shield material's microscopic structure in simulated spacecraft atmospheric entry conditions.
A shared interest in gathering,
discussing and improving water quality data among diverse groups can
lead to productive conversations that data alone can not address, the
scientists reported in «Engaging over data on fracking and water quality,» published in the journal Science.
Claude
discusses the complex paths that have
led science and
scientists toward the protection of human rights.
The film series features 14 of the world's
leading scientists and three historians of science
discussing exciting scientific advances — and their own wonder and amazement as they explore our world.
At ESOF meetings
leading scientists, researchers, young researchers, business people, entrepreneurs and innovators, policy makers, science and technology communicators and the general public from all over Europe
discuss new discoveries and debate the direction that research is taking in the sciences, humanities and social sciences.
Following a brief «tour» through the years
leading up to the first Earth Day, he then
discusses lessons learned and Brookhaven Lab
scientists» research that may be applied, today and in the future, to determine what Earth will be like 50 years from now.
In addition to Amgen's work to improve cancer patient treatment through science - based innovation, CRI will also recognize the company's commitment to the broader scientific and patient communities, both through its support of CRI's Cancer Immunotherapy Month education and awareness initiative, and for its support of the CRI - CIMT - EATI - AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference, a joint program of four cancer research organizations that convenes world -
leading scientists to
discuss the latest in cancer immunology and immunotherapy research.
Throughout the research training the cohort will meet and
discuss their research, building a group of outstanding
scientists that will help to
lead world research in nanoscience in the future.
And finally, what about Mark's questions (# 3) and other factors not
discussed here — do all these effects re Arctic ice
lead scientists to believe there is a greater and / or earlier chance (assuming we continue increasing our GHG emissions — business as usual) of melting hydrates and permafrost releasing vast stores of methane into the atmosphere than
scientists believed before the study, or is the assessment of this about the same, or
scientists are not sure if this study indicates a greater / lesser / same chance of this?
In four presentations,
leading scientists Andrew H. Knoll of Harvard University, Naomi Oreskes of the University of California, San Diego, and Daniel P. Schrag of Harvard University guide us on an exciting exploration of the history of life on Earth and
discuss present - day concerns about climate change.
One of the
leading scientists working in this field is Professor Anthony Atala, who
leads a team... Continue reading Regenerative Medicine: Prof. Anthony Atala
discusses its past, present and future
They will have the opportunity to interact with
leading scientists and
discuss their research with both
scientists and other students.
Nano: the Next Dimension is a short television documentary featuring several
leading physical
scientists discussing nanotechnology and its applications - amongst these are Nobel laureates Jean - Marie Lehn and Sir Harry Kroto.
Leading scientists and researchers recently gathered in Seattle to
discuss and debate personalization and the future of health care.
Lucy Jago
discusses The Northern Lights, Norwegian
scientist Kristian Birkeland, and the history behind the scientific «hunch» that
led Birkeland through years of tracking the aurora borealis.
The
scientists and Weissman decided to meet with Lemons, who had just arrived at the Center to
lead Technology Transfer, to
discuss what to do next.
At the ITB Berlin Convention practical experts and
leading scientists will be
discussing and providing information on the latest developments.
Original post In 2011, a Cornell research team
led by the environmental
scientist Robert Howarth published «Methane and the greenhouse - gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations,» a widely
discussed paper positing that gas escaping from drilling operations using hydraulic fracturing, widely known as fracking, made natural gas a bigger climate threat than the most infamous fossil fuel, coal.
Here you can listen to one of the
lead authors, Jeremy Shakun, a visiting postdoctoral fellow at Harvard,
discuss reactions from other
scientists and answer some questions I raised:
And finally, what about Mark's questions (# 3) and other factors not
discussed here — do all these effects re Arctic ice
lead scientists to believe there is a greater and / or earlier chance (assuming we continue increasing our GHG emissions — business as usual) of melting hydrates and permafrost releasing vast stores of methane into the atmosphere than
scientists believed before the study, or is the assessment of this about the same, or
scientists are not sure if this study indicates a greater / lesser / same chance of this?
British
scientists have predicted that global temperature rise may exceed 1.5 C, a threshold
discussed during talks
leading to the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement.
A group of
scientists leading some of the nation's top science organizations has sent a letter to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt asking him for a meeting to
discuss his support for a RT / BT exercise on climate science.
In a study published today in Earth's Future, a journal of the American Geophysical Union,
lead author Xiao - Hai Yan of the University of Delaware, Newark, along with
scientists from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, and several other institutions
discuss new understanding of the phenomenon.
Yale Environment 360 asked some
leading climate
scientists to
discuss what they consider to be the most noteworthy or surprising findings in the recently released report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's working group on the physical science of a warming world.
A recording of a phone conference call July 20, 2015, in which James E. Hansen of Columbia University (and formerly NASA's
lead climate
scientist)
discussed a new discussion paper positing that abrupt sea level rise is a significant prospect with unabated greenhouse gas emissions.
In Chapter 7 of Requiem, I describe a conference I attended in Oxford in September 2009 at which many of the world's
leading climate
scientists discussed for the first time what a world at 4 °C would be like.
«
leading Australian climate
scientists will
discuss the impact of Australia's decision to sign the United Nations» Sustainable Development Goals and the upcoming COP21.»
The author's of a new study
led by
scientists from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Cambridge came to the SMC to
discuss the findings of a new study which identified a potential Achilles» heel of the malaria parasite with the potential to
lead to new drugs and vaccines.
The occurrences
discussed in this article are five of some 60 known weather - related phenomenon, which can
lead to what climate
scientist James Hansen has termed the «Venus Syndrome,» where oceans would boil and the surface temperature of earth could reach 462 degrees Celsius.
In a recent paper titled «Scientific reticence and sea level rise», 4 James Hansen
discusses the traditional caution of
scientists that has
led them to downplay the risks of sea level rise of several metres due to the collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet.
Michael Mann, a
leading climate
scientist and professor of meteorology at Pennsylvania State University whose hacked personal emails have recently become the source of media attention was joined by NASA climate
scientist Dr. Gavin Schmidt, Princeton's Dr. Michael Oppenheimer, and CAP Senior Fellow Dr. Joseph Romm to
discuss the overwhelming scientific understanding of the danger posed by unmitigated global warming pollution, and that the stolen emails reveal nothing that changes our extensive understanding of climate science.
People who know little about the science want to
lead the discussion to science instead of being happy to
discuss on issues they understand as well as
scientists.
Hence the recent Harrabin Q&A session giving prominence to past temperature change and and the Guardian series on the CRU hack
leading with a profile of Steve McIntyre and going on to
discuss the supposed suppression of sceptical science by climate
scientists.
The occasion saw innovators, policymakers, and
leading scientists converge in Rwanda's capital where the theme «Connecting Science to Humanity» was
discussed.