Sentences with phrase «learned judge in this case»

Not exact matches

The Code provides in the same Rule that «A judge is permitted to make public statements (my emphasis) in the course of his or her official duties or to explain for public information the procedure of the court, general legal principles, or what may be learned from the public record in a case.

We are looking with the National Crime Agency and others at what more can be done to keep dating safe, and Judge Dickinson is right in saying that has to include learning lessons from the Lawrance case.»

Speaking about online dating's part in the case, Judge Dickinson said: «I would like to see if lessons can be learned on the use of such sites.

«If we can find out how far the understanding can extend its view; how far it has faculties to attain certainty; and in what cases it can only judge and guess, we may learn to content ourselves with what is attainable by us in this state.»

In this respect, the evidence upon which a decision could be made was greater than the evidence that Prakash J. dealt with in SM Integrated Transware Ltd v. Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd. [6] However, in this instance, the learned judge took the view that the e-mail address was similar to an automatically generated name and facsimile number of the sender of a facsimile transmission, a state of affairs considered in the New York case of Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co., Inc. v. Estate of Fred Short, d / b / a Sime Construction Co. [7] Counsel for J Pereira Fernandes SA submitted that the intent to sign was not relevant, and mentioned Elpis Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Marti Chartering CoIn this respect, the evidence upon which a decision could be made was greater than the evidence that Prakash J. dealt with in SM Integrated Transware Ltd v. Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd. [6] However, in this instance, the learned judge took the view that the e-mail address was similar to an automatically generated name and facsimile number of the sender of a facsimile transmission, a state of affairs considered in the New York case of Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co., Inc. v. Estate of Fred Short, d / b / a Sime Construction Co. [7] Counsel for J Pereira Fernandes SA submitted that the intent to sign was not relevant, and mentioned Elpis Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Marti Chartering Coin SM Integrated Transware Ltd v. Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd. [6] However, in this instance, the learned judge took the view that the e-mail address was similar to an automatically generated name and facsimile number of the sender of a facsimile transmission, a state of affairs considered in the New York case of Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co., Inc. v. Estate of Fred Short, d / b / a Sime Construction Co. [7] Counsel for J Pereira Fernandes SA submitted that the intent to sign was not relevant, and mentioned Elpis Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Marti Chartering Coin this instance, the learned judge took the view that the e-mail address was similar to an automatically generated name and facsimile number of the sender of a facsimile transmission, a state of affairs considered in the New York case of Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co., Inc. v. Estate of Fred Short, d / b / a Sime Construction Co. [7] Counsel for J Pereira Fernandes SA submitted that the intent to sign was not relevant, and mentioned Elpis Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Marti Chartering Coin the New York case of Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co., Inc. v. Estate of Fred Short, d / b / a Sime Construction Co. [7] Counsel for J Pereira Fernandes SA submitted that the intent to sign was not relevant, and mentioned Elpis Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Marti Chartering Co..

We would not want to leave this case without adding that we are in complete sympathy and agreement with the penultimate paragraph of the learned trial judge's reasons.

In the case of R. v. Downey, the trial judge found that the accused's suspicion had been aroused to the point that there was a need for inquiry, but she deliberately did not inquire so as not to learn the truth.

Remember how you learned in legal writing 101 that the judge did not care what you personally thought and only cared about what cases and statutes said?

Those records would generally be available to a judge overseeing your case so if you repeatedly end up in court for the same thing, they're gonna know and they're gonna stop scrubbing it from your record or offerring certain options because you're clearly not learning your lesson.

One thing you will learn about law in due course, if you haven't already, is that sometimes judges forget to mention the cases.

In this case, in the exercise of his discretion, the learned chambers judge, who was also the case management judge, decided that the interests of justice favoured disclosure and ordered that the clinics and doctors provide the representative plaintiff with the names and contact information of those individuals who were injected with Dermalive, a cosmetic filler, which is alleged to have caused granuloma, a medical conditioIn this case, in the exercise of his discretion, the learned chambers judge, who was also the case management judge, decided that the interests of justice favoured disclosure and ordered that the clinics and doctors provide the representative plaintiff with the names and contact information of those individuals who were injected with Dermalive, a cosmetic filler, which is alleged to have caused granuloma, a medical conditioin the exercise of his discretion, the learned chambers judge, who was also the case management judge, decided that the interests of justice favoured disclosure and ordered that the clinics and doctors provide the representative plaintiff with the names and contact information of those individuals who were injected with Dermalive, a cosmetic filler, which is alleged to have caused granuloma, a medical condition.

That parent will have a second opportunity to make their case for the proposed move at trial where they may well be in a position to adduce evidence establishing that the present circumstances are having a deleterious impact on the child's physical or emotional needs; and having lost their initial chambers application, the moving parent no doubt will come away from the experience as a «dress rehearsal» having learned all the flaws and gaps in their factual / legal presentation that they can improve upon and fill in for the trial judge.

If a judge puts an entirely public profile on social media, it would seem there is no ethical rule precluding a lawyer from reading the public profile and utilizing information learned from it so long as the use of the information is in accordance with the ethical rules (i.e., you can't communicate ex parte with the judge about the subject of your case just because they posted on Facebook about a topic of mutual interest).

«At Mueller Probe's First Trial, Expect More Blunt Lectures From the Bench; Judge in Paul Manafort case, who questioned special counsel Robert Mueller's authority to bring it, is known for stern rebukes and emotional asides»: Aruna Viswanatha of The Wall Street Journal has an article that begins, «Former prosecutor Gene Rossi learned to expect lectures and humiliation when he appeared before U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis, who regularly ridiculed his arguments.»

Students next learn how to become advocates for their clients by representing them in court and, ultimately, arguing their case in front of a panel of judges.

«no person, not even the most learned judge, much less a layman, is capable of knowing in advance of an ultimate decision in his particular case by this Court whether certain material comes within the area of «obscenity.»

This argument, as applied to the case in the court below, by a learned judge, assumes the whole matter in dispute, and need not, therefore, be further pursued; but I would merely ask, whether any case can be found, to which this doctrine has been applied in justification, in which the consequential injury has been not partial and incidential, but total.

11 Accordingly, notwithstanding the principle (which I do not doubt) that questions of apportionment are generally questions of fact with which we should interfere only in exceptional cases, I would conclude that the issues I have referred to are ones of law and that the learned trial judge erred in law in placing too high a standard on the plaintiff and in failing to consider the assumptions she was entitled to make.

In this case, the learned judge essentially concluded that, because defence counsel believed they had a reasonable opportunity of beating the plaintiff's offers, they were not offers that ought reasonably to have been accepted:

The way in which a judge can learn about the claimant's case and the defendant's story is through a combination of reading the court forms and listening to evidence at the hearing.

In particular, the Appellant respectfully submits that the learned trial judge erred in law in finding that the Appellant's guilty is the only rational inference that can be drawn in this casIn particular, the Appellant respectfully submits that the learned trial judge erred in law in finding that the Appellant's guilty is the only rational inference that can be drawn in this casin law in finding that the Appellant's guilty is the only rational inference that can be drawn in this casin finding that the Appellant's guilty is the only rational inference that can be drawn in this casin this case.

Learn how Minnesota not only successfully utilized a team of judges to develop a judicial case management application from the ground up, but also involved judges in the development, testing, and configuration of an automated workflow solution.

In some cases when one parent has not done the individual sessions at all, the parents have returned to court and the judge has firmly told the other parent that he or she needs to participate, and that what they learn may impact the judge's future decisions.

When one considers that arguing attorneys and family law judges typically learn about Parental Alienation via arguments, examinations and cross examinations in court, it should not be surprising that such understandings are usually limited to the facts of a particular case, and are not necessarily characteristic of specific knowledge acquisition.

In these cases, they will end up back in court and the judge can observe their learning (or not) regarding these three skillIn these cases, they will end up back in court and the judge can observe their learning (or not) regarding these three skillin court and the judge can observe their learning (or not) regarding these three skills.

So, what the learned, but possibly biased (remember, the 50/50 rule pro or con here) Judge has publicly stated as reasoning for the continuance of Dale's suit is, in «my» own words, that... «In my mind (according to how I personally see things in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reasonJudge has publicly stated as reasoning for the continuance of Dale's suit is, in «my» own words, that... «In my mind (according to how I personally see things in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (sin «my» own words, that... «In my mind (according to how I personally see things in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (sIn my mind (according to how I personally see things in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (sin my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (sin this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reasonjudge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (sin this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (s):