Let schools be places for learning, not places that kill the spirit of
learning through standardized tests and standardized test preparation.
Not exact matches
Widely affirmed proposals call for the restructure of low - performing schools, more emphasis on the basics, safer classrooms, more rigorous graduation standards, periodic measurement of progress
through some kind of
standardized tests, longer days and year - round schooling, decentralization into smaller
learning communities and greater freedom for those smaller units, smaller classes, better - qualified teachers and improved salaries, more parental input and more equitable funding.
The backlash against
standardized testing is rippling
through some Roman Catholic schools as they balance the college - driven Common Core
learning standards with spiritual goals.
In «
Learning from Rudolf Steiner: The Relevance of Waldorf Education for Urban Public School Reform,» a study published in 2008 in the journal Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice, researcher Ida Oberman concluded that the Waldorf approach successfully laid the groundwork for future academics by first engaging students
through integrated arts lessons and strong relationships instead of preparing them for
standardized tests.
Whether individually or
through facilitated professional development, teachers spend a lot of time unpacking the
standardized tests and the targeted standards and
learning on which they're based.
So how do we, as a country entrenched in an education system that distributes
standardized tests and groups students based on chronological age rather than rate of
learning, break
through its mental barriers and start to embrace — and demand — the science of the individual?
One notable early finding, Ms. Phillips said, is that teachers who incessantly drill their students to prepare for
standardized tests tend to have lower value - added
learning gains than those who simply work their way methodically
through the key concepts of literacy and mathematics.
«A school administrator,» he wrote, «can not watch teachers teach (except
through classroom visits that momentarily may change the teacher's behavior) and can not tell how much students have
learned (except by
standardized tests that do not clearly differentiate between what the teacher has imparted and what the student has acquired otherwise).»
Through more than 20 years of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), we have lived with a uniform definition of accountability, that of a
standardized test used to make determinations of student
learning and school and district progress.
Learning math
through standardized tests does not provide enough interaction.
Students in 3rd
through 8th grade took either the Badger exam, the beleaguered state
standardized test given for the first and last time last spring, or the Dynamic
Learning Maps (DLM) exam, an alternative assessment given to students with severe cognitive disabilities
Power Standards /
Learning Targets Whether individually or through facilitated professional development, teachers spend a lot of time unpacking the standardized tests and the targeted standards and learning on which they'r
Learning Targets Whether individually or
through facilitated professional development, teachers spend a lot of time unpacking the
standardized tests and the targeted standards and
learning on which they'r
learning on which they're based.
Through coaching provided by TSCCI partners Eskolta and reDesign, Bronx Haven's principal at the time, Lucinda Mendez, and a team of teachers launched a multiyear effort to shift the school's focus from traditional outcome measures — like
standardized test scores — toward the
learning process itself.
The backlash against
standardized testing is rippling
through some Roman Catholic schools as they balance the college - driven Common Core
learning standards with spiritual goals.
VAM purports to be able to take student
standardized test scores and measure the «value» a teacher adds to student
learning through complicated formulas that can supposedly factor out all of the other influences — including how violence affects students — and emerge with a valid assessment of how effective a particular teacher has been.
You make teachers more accountable (lowering benefits, replacing tenure with «merit pay») and you put students
through high - stakes
testing to make sure they've
learned the exact body of knowledge you want them to have, or, alternatively, how to pass a
standardized test.
The promises of affordable textbooks that could be updated with the latest information at a moment's notice haven't come
through; even the much - touted bells and whistles approach to tablet - based academic ebooks have gone largely stagnant as
learning outcomes have not been noticeably improved — at least not according to the almighty
standardized tests — with the addition of embedded content.