He has been regularly involved with the battle to secure the future development of both Bart's hospital and St Mary's Paddington (the two local hospitals) and is a champion for
leaseholder rights over the proposed changes in the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill.
Not exact matches
The Housing Minister said: «I most certainly do not feel comfortable with that level of concern
right across the country... I am very keen to explore how we can promote greater transparency and fairness, and to work with all interested parties to improve
leaseholders» experience of home ownership.»
Notably, if sub-para 4 (7) and para 8 apply, the
leaseholder has no
right to make observations on the cost.
Of course, at that time, enfranchisement
rights were confined to house leases: flat
leaseholders had to wait until 1993 before being accorded similar
rights.
Since that time flat
leaseholders have acquired equivalent
rights: a collective
right to buy the freehold to their block and an individual
right to by a new lease.
The customer will learn that coverage taken out on a property as part of a rental agreement provides the same level of coverage that as a homeowner would, because in fact, the rental contract acknowledges the
leaseholder's
right to take personal responsibility for protecting the valuables that the family owns, and to provide for the family should an accident happen that causes physical injury to any person in the home.
In relation to the primary production upgrade provisions, the inconsistency is between the exercise of native title
rights and the carrying out of a range of activities that the
leaseholder may wish to pursue, in addition to the
rights granted under the lease.
Primary production upgrade provisions; The justification for the amendments that permit pastoral
leaseholders to carry out a range of activities (in addition to those authorised by their lease) without negotiating with native title holders whose
rights might be affected by these additional activities (28) is that the provisions strike a reasonable balance between the competing
rights of native title holders and pastoral lessees.
However where the
leaseholder, in the exercise of
rights under the lease, conducted activities that were inconsistent with the native title
rights, such as the erection of a shed or fence, the doing of these activities would prevail over the native title
rights.
In concrete, the High Court should uphold the finding of Justices Lee and North that enclosure of and improvements to pastoral leases in Western Australia [99] were not such as to confer a
right of possession exclusive of Aboriginal people, and to the extent of any inconsistency between the
rights of pastoral
leaseholders and native title
rights and interests, did not extinguish but had the effect of suspending native title
rights and interests.