But they share one thing in common: that lawmakers should at
least accept climate science, regardless of party affiliation.
Not exact matches
In 2009 he said, when talking about
climate change, that the «
science is highly contentious, to say the
least» and «the
climate change argument is absolute crap», but did
accept that precautionary action against it was a good idea.
The Clinton Foundation has
accepted at
least $ 1 million from ExxonMobil, despite the company's history of financing challenges to
climate science.
Rep. Bob Inglis, a six - term Republican Congressman from South Carolina and member of the House Committee on
Science and Technology, lost his primary bid for re-election to a Tea Party - backed candidate who accused him of not being conservative enough, at
least in part because of his record of
accepting reality on
climate change.
Well, someone who writes that his position on
climate science seems to be a choice between fraud and incompetence, I'd say it's more likely 100 % of the people who
accept mainstream
climate science believe that to be true, and probably at
least 25 % of those who
accept that pi is approximately 3.14159...