Sentences with phrase «least give your reader»

This is the image that describes your post or at least gives the reader an IDEA as to what the post is about.

As a rule, the domain name you choose should at least give your reader an idea about what the website is about.

It isn't essential to name the client, but at least give the reader the chance to judge whether the client was comparable to their situation.

Not exact matches

Publishers who adopted the idea of Facebook hosting their comments were relieved and delighted that the part of their universe they found the least rewarding — reader interactions — were given to an expert hosting community.

Actually a fourth and least authoritative line of inquiry might be added, consisting of (4) «Mere Rumors and Things Said by Bertrand Russell on this Subject» postmodernist readers may wish employ the same four lines of inquiry, and simply reverse the amount of attention given to each, and they might also add an account of the telling things that no one said or thought about Bergson and Whitehead.

Thank you for your input as no less than 100 readers were kind enough to participate in my not - so - scientific survey of what is least important to them, when given a choice to give up one item ranging between a TV, vehicle, laptop / tablet, and a smartphone.

I realize that there are many opinions and competing theories at the fringe of our knowledge about the cosmos and our existence, but you could at least reference this conflict and give readers some context for this latest venture into the unknown.

Your map in Figure 3a (and the cover of Nature) gives the casual reader the perception that all of Antarctica has exhibited a warming trend from 1957 - 2006, when in fact, it seems that at least one location, direct, local observations indicate otherwise.

Last but not least, I'm giving away a $ 500 Avo Awards prize pack to one lucky reader who votes in the Avo Awards!

This statement blatantly misleads the reader, given that those 80 minutes are spent across at least 5 different adaptive online learning programs — not just DreamBox as the quote inferred.

Today, I'm excited to share 12 incredible resources for struggling readers that will at least give you a few pieces to that puzzle.

My beta readers are the first people to read my work and I give them a very tightly edited «first» draft (this first draft has had at least two or more rounds of edits to it)

Digital comics The blogger known as Ekko gives a pretty good overview of the digital comics scene and what needs to happen next, at least from a comics reader's point of view.

Cover Design: the fine art of making your cover look good, with type elements and art elements in the right places, and the proper signals being given off to let the reader know, at least subconciously, that they will like this book and it is a professional production.

Epub is enough to satisfy me as a reader (and I do not even care about epub3) and at least can give you a summary of your book... Amazon compels you to connect (are you all reading at home only?)

You should get feedback from at least 3 - 5 beta readers (not your mom or dad) who can give you critical feedback on your work.

Given how much of a lower percentage the author tends to get from a publisher per sale and the uncertainty of being able to convert a casual reader into a regular, the author needs to be certain that the publisher can at least quadruple the book's reader - base before it makes sense to go with them.

Quite the contrary, a surfeit of doomsayers saw in the arrival of eBooks and eBook readers — the sales of which dropped by eight million last year — the end of print or at least the demise of given literary forms, like the novel.

I did want a title that would give readers a clear sense of what to expect or at least that they should definitely not expect a typical love story.

Many manga readers do feel a responsibility to support the creators and publishers of the original work, and Crunchyroll is giving them the opportunity to do that without having to pay any actual money, at least at first.

In other words, the English country house story, with its numerous attractions to writers and readers alike, is liable to persist at least as long as the venerable structures that give the genre its name.

At least B&N isn't giving up on ebook readers like Sony did.

It's a sad state of affairs, and I can only hope that the self - published authors who are giving other authors bad reviews will eventually learn that readers usually don't trust books that get nothing but perfect reviews, and that, since their sales ranking on Amazon, at least, is very low, they're not selling any books anyway and they'll stop trying to be authors.

Because businesses such as comiXology seldom give details, it's hard to know how many downloads were paid vs. free, or whether this number includes multiple downloads of the same comic (at least one comiXology upgrade required readers to download all their comics anew).

I'm quite sure if I did so 15 hours a day, my penetration rate would increase, at least in an absolute sense — I'd see more readers giving it a whirl over their margaritas, the more hours I stood there.

Given the fact that the Kobo Aura 2 sells for $ 119, it would make sense for them to release an ebook reader under $ 100, or at least drop the price of the Aura to $ 99.

And now that KU is blind to the length of your story, you're free to craft it however you like... and given that readers seem to love short stories and serials (at least in romance, but increasingly in other genres), I don't expect those forms to go away.

It's taken me awhile to come up with a format for The Literary Entrepreneur, but each week on Fridays I would like to share at least 3 - 5 links that will motivate, excite and give you ideas on how to attract readers to your books.

B&N should drop the price of ebooks OR at least give the 10 % discount using their reader club card.

Send your book to at least two beta readers — readers who are willing to read your book and give you constructive feedback.

Many authors now give ebooks away for free and it is a recommended strategy to gain more readers for a print copy, or at least for a second book.

If they want to compete against Amazon, or at least give a customer a choice, how is offering to sell a reader an ebook at a higher price point going to do that?

Ironically, your average, casual reader is the least likely to give a review, especially when there is no prompt or direction to do so.

Like I said, I don't think my series has enough of the popular tropes to really kill it (and I already gave away over 1500 copies of Book 1 to my regular readers), but I'm crossing my fingers that it will at least do well enough that I won't regret having «genre hopped» instead of buckling down and writing more fantasy.

Given that a growing number of authors are e-only — or at least start as an ebook before moving on to print — this offers a new way to reach Goodreads» huge pool of readers.

Most publishers who do this at least give their print readers a native digital edition when they have paid up twice — not Saveur.

And, you know, despite being given a reasonably healthy advance, I would have expected at least some — maybe not an equivalent amount — but some amount to have been spent on getting those books into the... bringing them to the attention of readers, and that didn't really happen, at least not that I could see, so I stopped writing.

I have to say that I recently saw a friend's new Kobo reader, and it was a sleek, lovely, light, and WATERPROOF piece of genius, and I really hope they give Amazon a run for at least some of their money.

Every one else in the value investing blogshere seems to have given in to peer pressure, or at least to reader pressure, but, no, I'm not going to; I'm not going to post the results of my portfolio for the first half of the year on a stock by stock basis.

Thumbs up to them for at least giving notice of the change (and thanks to Mommy Points reader Lynn for letting me know).

This would be so much a problem if each site did at least give their criteria for judging a game, but even then it's up to the reader to actually find out what that is, which those just perusing scores, or using meta - critic don't.

This is perhaps the least newsworthy item for readers here, given how much The Times has covered the mix of issues arising as summer sea ice retreats in the Arctic and pressures grow to exploit new shipping routes and northern resources.

PS (27 October): Since at least one of our readers failed to understand the description in our paper, here we give an explanation of our approach in layman's terms.

Though the authors note further biases, I find it surprising that they did not at least give a «guestimate» for the additional uncertainties to give at least some preliminary example of the impacts to highlight to readers that those uncertainties exist.

And maybe at least defaulting to listening to the scientists who study this, rather than highly self reinforcing websites that exist to simply refute the notion of climate change itself (including this one, under the auspices of «looking at all sides» but yet remarkably always only looking at one, and repeatedly misconstruing the issue to do it), where readers and commenters are largely only exposed to views that simply reinforce or mirror their own, and give them a much broader sense of relevancy or correctness than such views really have.

To be non RC - ish, I think you have to say why its trash or at least give a powerful hint, not just «an exercise left up to the reader».

I can't take the time to intervene in these discussions and they tend to give a very bad impression to outside readers, to say the least.

But given that Slaw has so many international readers who may not be following our local news, I thought it imperative to at least mention it.

If you decide to start with a long anecdote, at least remember remember to give the reader a preview of your point before you get too far afield.

Whether it is legally necessary, I would argue it is ethically necessary, or at least helpful, to give the readers of your advice enough information to judge for themselves the credibility of your advice.