If you want to trade stocks and other financial products, at
least know the risks.
Not exact matches
Uber's case is that the driver enters into a binding agreement with a person whose identity he does not
know (and will never
know) and who does not
know and will never
know his identity, to undertake a journey to a destination not told to him until the journey begins, by a route prescribed by a stranger to the contract [Uber] from which he is not free to depart (at
least not without
risk), for a fee which (a) is set by the stranger, and (b) is not
known by the passenger (who only is told the total to be paid), (c) is calculated by the stranger (as a percentage of the total sum) and (d) is paid to the stranger.
And if you need to cobble together multiple plans to insure for greater
risk, you at
least can take comfort from
knowing that there are dozens of companies that might be interested in doing business with you.
For both target keyword and related keywords we give you a Usage Score that helps you keep the balance between letting search engines
know what your page is about (at
least as aggressively as the top rankers), but without going too far and
risking an over-optimization penalty.
But here's the problem: Our bank - stability apparatus — the Fed, the FDIC, occasional bailouts — encourages banks and other lenders to take unwise
risks because they
know (or at
least believe) they'll get rescued.
Although there is
no right or wrong way to profit in the stock market, we feel the best way to yield consistent stock trading profits is through following a disciplined, rule - based trading strategy and market timing system that yields consistent gains with the
least amount of proportionate
risk.
Since they
knew, or at
least had good information on, whether he had done these things, it is highly unlikely that they would have
risked there lives by professing a belief they
knew to be false.
Did you
know that nine out of ten people have at
least one
risk factor for heart disease and stroke?
Lowest
risk of leaching,
least toxic, no
known health hazards.
We all
know that Wenger has taken a
risk by not buying a striker, especially in the light of the injury to Danny Welbeck (who may not have helped much anyway) but at
least Wenger still has faith in his team, and as supporters we too should have faith in our players to compete for trophies — which they will as the season progresses.
The regulars here are pretty up on these things and the most recent studies of homebirth have as far as I
know have universally shown the homebirth has at
least 3x the perinatal death rate of similar
risk hospital birth.
We
know it's higher than in hospital, but that is at
least partly due to inadequate midwifery education and to some high
risk women being considered as suitable candidates for homebirth, so it's a foregone conclusion that the stats will be bad.
That it clearly appears to have been, from everything I have read, the fault of coaches and parents bent on playing on,
no matter what the score,
no matter what the
risk to their own kids» safety, is, not the
least bit surprising in an increasingly winner - take - all society.
We
know that athletes who are allowed to continue playing with concussion
risk, at the very
least, a slower recovery from concussion, and, in rare cases, catastrophic injury or even death from second impact syndrome.
The reality is, and you at
least should
know this so you'll transfer her ASAP if something seems like it's going wrong, that even low
risk homebirths can go bad.
Each month you give your baby formula increases the
risks of diabetes, breast cancer, being overweight (at
least what scientists have proven so far, god
knows what else we simply don'tknow)
One paper in Britain claims that for a select group of very low
risk women who have had at
least one successful vaginal delivery home birth is
no more dangerous than hospital birth.
Aside from the fact that living with an overindulged child can often be unpleasant, to say the
least, the
risks of overindulgence include kids having trouble with the following: learning to wait to get something they want (delayed gratification), not being the constant center of attention, taking care of themselves, taking responsibility, and
knowing what is enough.
Subsequently, by virtue of defining that an adult and infant are unable to safely sleep on the same surface together, such as what occurs during bedsharing, even when all
known adverse bedsharing
risk factors are absent and safe bedsharing practices involving breastfeeding mothers are followed, an infant that dies while sharing a sleeping surface with his / her mother is labeled a SUID, and not SIDS.26 In this way the infant death statistics increasingly supplement the idea that bedsharing is inherently and always hazardous and lend credence, artificially, to the belief that under no circumstance can a mother, breastfeeding or not, safely care for, or protect her infant if asleep together in a bed.27 The legitimacy of such a sweeping inference is highly problematic, we argue, in light of the fact that when careful and complete examination of death scenes, the results revealed that 99 % of bedsharing deaths could be explained by the presence of at
least one and usually multiple independent
risk factors for SIDS such as maternal smoking, prone infant sleep, use of alcohol and / or drugs by the bedsharing adults.28 Moreover, this new ideology is especially troubling because it leads to condemnations of bedsharing parents that border on charges of being neglectful and / or abusive.
But if you're going to resort to using these contraptions, you at
least need to
know the
risks.)
If I shoot someone in the park, there is a
risk for me to be caught by a courageous passer - by, a cop, a military who happened to be there... Any witness, at
least, will
know at once what exactly he has witnessed.
«The
risk is quite high that you're facing because you are dealing with depositors» funds but you don't
know who they (borrowers) are, and you don't
know where they live, so we (government) basically said you need to at
least put these fundamentals in place before you can really expect a sustainable decline in interest rates that can be driven by proper
risk assessment through credit rating agencies and so on.
He was thereby admitting that his proposed change in the law would put at
risk the lives of those
least able to stand up for themselves and say «
no».
The
risk is real: we
know that the West Antarctic ice sheet has collapsed many times in the past, raising sea levels at
least 3 metres.
«We've
known that aging is a major
risk factor for most chronic diseases for some time, but recently, we've gained a better understanding of the aging process's basic underpinnings, which has allowed us to extend both life span and health — in animals at
least,» says Felipe Sierra, director of the Division of Aging Biology at the National Institute on Aging.
They also tracked Apolipoprotein E (APOE 4), a well -
known genetic
risk factor for Alzheimer's, as well as lifetime cumulative exposure to unhealthy levels of PM2.5 — particles which are at
least 30 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair and frequently cause the haze over urban areas.
«In adults, we
know that at
least 50 percent of one's
risk for opioid dependence is genetic, which is why it would make sense that infants respond differently to opioid medication exposure,» said Elisha Wachman, MD, a neonatologist at BMC and who served as the study's lead author.
Professor Jeremy Pearson, Associate Medical Director at the BHF, which part - funded the study, said: «By using the power of very large scale genetic studies, this research is the first to show that the
known association between increased height and a lower
risk of coronary heart disease is at
least in part due to genetics, rather than purely down to nutrition or lifestyle factors.
«The higher
risk of tumor recurrence that we observed among African American women was reduced when controlling for those factors, suggesting that these genomic differences contribute, at
least partly, to the
known racial disparity in the survival of African American and Caucasian breast cancer patients.»
On the basis of the current studies as well as previous reports on the use of intradermal immunization against influenza, hepatitis B, rabies, and other infectious diseases, 2,3,8 it is becoming clear that use of the intradermal route may at
least partially overcome the relatively poor influenza - specific immune responses seen in certain at -
risk populations, particularly the elderly, in whom the immune response in general is
known to diminish with age.9 Moreover, in times of shortage, the dose - sparing intradermal approach might be particularly well suited to the young, healthy persons included in the CDC's high - priority group for vaccination, such as health care workers, as well as to younger, otherwise healthy populations in general.
Alcohol is a
known risk factor for breast cancer and at
least seven types of digestive system cancers, and alcohol may also increase the
risk of cancers of the skin and pancreas, the researchers said.
And University of Arizona researchers recently reported that postmenopausal women who most closely adhered to the American Cancer Society's Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity for Cancer Prevention, which include eating at
least 2 1/2 cups of fruits and vegetables a day (
no matter what kind or color), had a 22 % lower
risk of breast cancer than those who complied the
least.
At the
risk of sounding cliché, I really do want to help others or at the very
least let women
know that they are not alone and have an important place in this world.
And all of these benefits combine to help lower a person's
risk of cardiovascular disease (among many other diseases including at
least 11
known cancers) by reducing
risk factors like obesity, hypertension, and high blood cholesterol.
Even if you can't find these exact items in the store (that's the
risk you take when writing about things that are on sale), you'll at
least have guidelines so you
know what to spend your money on.
At the very
least online dating companies need to let their clientele
know the
risks that they face.
I have to tell you, if you are already looking at your building and growth, and
know your at -
risk, and high - growth and low - growth [students], there really weren't too many surprises, at
least not in my district.
Teachers should
know a student for at
least 6 to 8 weeks before assessing his or her
risk factors and have clear evidence of a student's behavior in order to provide a score.
Having a supportive partner who is willing to let you take the
risk is an AMAZING thing,
no matter if it's husband or wife or otherwise, and if you succeed as well as some of these women have it's likely you're at
least an equal financial partner if not the primary one.
You can not
risk your career by hiring any random company having
least knowledge about the writing
know - how.
On the basis of «CREATOR principles» previously set by the SoA, demands include that authors should receive «at
least» 50 % of the revenue from e-book sales, «not a mere 25 %» they do currently, that authors don't have their «hands tied with contracts that can not be terminated when a book is
no longer being exploited», for publishers to drop non-compete clauses and for indemnity clauses, often included to help protect publishers financially against cases brought on the basis of plagarism and libel, «to spread the
risk fairly between the publisher and the author».
Nevertheless, if you
know the
risk, the chances are that you can mitigate it or at
least can have a back plan.
And
knowing that through your financial planning you've identified what your target rate of return is and you've built a portfolio with the
least possible
risk and the highest chance of still getting to your goal.
(Side note: yes, I
know that it is difficult to determine the amount of
risk shed, and different actuaries might come to different conclusions, but can't we at
least agree on the underlying theory?)
So, we
know that
risk reward strategies work, there is no doubt about that at all; you randomly enter the market and if you make at
least 2 times your
risk on your winning trades, you will likely breakeven or turn a small profit over a series of trades.
At the very
least you should
know what pips, leverage and
risk management are, as well as how broker execution and spreads factor into your trades.
For 5 lakh amount, can go for long term as I will not require this fund in at
least for 5 - 7 yrs, I want to
know as it will be lump sump amount so how can I allocate it different investment instrument, MF being primary, and want to put this money in moderate
risk.?
And of course, the haunting specter of the Branch Davidian shootout
no doubt informs your
risk calculus, at
least subconsciously.
If you
know the return you need, and you want the lowest -
risk way to achieve it (at
least based on nearly half a century of market history), this exercise should show you some interesting things.
At
least you will be able to
know what
risks you have, and that is an aid to asset management.