Sentences with phrase «least some money there»

Not exact matches

Much as advisers cling to the long - term view of portfolio management, there's something to be said from jumping out and in of over - and underperforming asset classes, at least with money you can afford to put at greater risk.

In order for a few million dollars to go «missing» here and there, and end up in the pockets of local politicians or shady middle - men, you've pretty much got to be mislabelling the money at the very least.

A startup entrepreneur needs to operate in at least three dimensions at once: There's time, there's money, and there's your target, the growth you need to achieve to demonstrate that you have a viable busiThere's time, there's money, and there's your target, the growth you need to achieve to demonstrate that you have a viable busithere's money, and there's your target, the growth you need to achieve to demonstrate that you have a viable busithere's your target, the growth you need to achieve to demonstrate that you have a viable business.

He goes on to say that, in the absence of a willingness to learn about the market, investors should at least put their money with a qualified registered advisor so that there is some accountability for the advice they receive.

For every one person who (temporarily, at least) gets rich, there must necessarily be thousands or millions more who lose money.

We look at both sides of the equation and that's smarter money management because there's really a limit to how much you can cut, whereas at least in theory, there's no limit to how much you can earn.

If I was an entrepreneur launching a crowdfunding campaign, I would probably go with IndieGoGo because, if my goal is $ 20,000 and I only raise $ 10,000, at least I'm halfway there and I can try to find other sources of money.

Although those words might usually be followed by the word «scam,» there's at least one case where the idea of free money isn't too good to be true.

Even if you really mean to say that the $ 29,163 is assuming a 5 % withdrawal rate over 20 years (assuming your assets will stay steady gaining 5 % a year) then there would still be no way to add the additional 2 % into the mix because you can't have money both in the stock market and in the risk free rate at the same time (at least, not the same money)

Unlike IRAs and employer sponsored plans, there are few to no eligibility requirements to open a taxable account (besides being at least 18 years old), no limits to how much an individual contribute to a taxable account and no restrictions on when an individual can withdraw money.

And in theory, at least, the total losses could add up to more money than there is in the entire world.

So, for you, what changed from the 2014 post where you «absolutely plan to have PC manage at least $ 100,000 to start this year and go from there» to the 2017 reply of not letting them invest your money?

If those keywords have CPC of at least a few dollars, then there's money to be made in that niche.

A lot of times if there's no way to make money, then maybe it's just best to try to stay out and then at least not lose any money.

If there is an uncertain future, at the very least, put in money that you could flush down the toilet and not bat an eye about.

However, there are different rules when it comes to accessing the earnings from your Roth IRA: That money is subject to the five - year rule that states that any earnings withdrawn before your first Roth IRA contribution is at least 5 years old may be subject to income taxes and a 10 % early withdrawal penalty.

But what if I told you there's a way to turn your least favorite money management... Read more

As for the robin hood idea — well it cna» t be left to those that are currently in power to give it to the masses... how about instead, we do a draft, like a war draft but with money being given away — say bi - quarterly so thats 8 people a year, and for the middle days of no give aways we do cedit checks on people who suppore families and give them a boost to there scores... thats only a start but they are ideas to build from at least!

Jesus thought there was something wrong with making money, or at least with making and keeping it

Yes I don't work or pay taxes, but at least I'm not some giant corporation stealing money from people like me who could work there.

First, because there's money in it: the pink pound is now a substantial economic factor in these things, just as in London, at least, the pink vote has to be courted by politicians seeking election.

There are those of us who are devoted Christians (you seldom see us on TV asking people to send us money to be «prayer partners») who are quite convinced that Christ would have us stand «with the least of our brethern».

He has to weed out the non-performers who are just there for the money and bring in at least a couple of hardened, no - nonsense players.

There's a load of money to be made on them, at least 50 million.

At least when you flush money down the toilet, there is still the chance the bowl clogs and overflows and you get your money back.

There are at least five big teams chasing Reds starlet Raheem Sterling this summer and it seems pretty clear the 20 - year - old wants out of Anfield after repeatedly rejecting new big - money contract offers at the club.

Football recruiting would invariably get at least a little bit better, and there'd be pressure on BYU to pay its coaching staff Power 5 money.

We all can see that we have been lacking a DM, CB, Striker since 2012... The money is there, the likes of Chelsea, City, United, Liverpool and Spuds have at least tried to spend money to address the problem positions in their squads..

At least there won't be any chance of the travelling Arsenal fans chanting «Spend the XXXXXXXXX money!»

I believe there are at least hundred fans who would donate their season ticket money to a just cause.

And tell the entire board that you, Budd, have informed us (fans) properly on the clubs actual financial status: that there's no money at all, at least not enof for Arsene.

Except, there's no sense throwing good money after bad, so the smartest thing to do is wait and see, and let the masses enjoy the genius of Adrian Beltre for one more season, at the very least.

You know Hafiz you have a strong point there, for a team that's had the same manager for almost 2 decades we should be putting in some world class performances on a regular (putting money aside) we should at least be the masters of tactics since we went through such a financial constraint.

It's better if Arsenal use the money they would have used on Mbappe to strengthen the required positions in our team.That would be the wiser thing to do.Besides it likely Mbappe will stay for at least one season before moving and to me he should.What is Wenger waiting for?Why not just go all out and sign a striker even if that'll be our only signing.Arsene should just sign someone who knows where the net is.I still can't believe wevmissed out on the EPL to Leicester.It was all down to poor finishing.Even if it was meant to be for Leicester there's a reason why everything happens.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

If not than stop confusing us if the money is not there just say it there's nothing wrong with being honest at least we'll know what to expect

Looks like Stan likes to kill animals ah wat money does to people they just get bored and cum up with stupid tv prog go kill animals makes me mad and sad and to think our club is ran by this man no wonder we are we're we are besides putting cash into tv, Stan get ur cash and give ozil and Sanchez and ox the money they want if doesn't do it go get bale that's wat real owner does and if Sanchez refuses da offer get the guys killing animals on ur programme to go hunting Sanchez sick being put down like how are spurs ahead of us there building now we're passed that we should be in champions league semis at least I don't no if it's wenger or da owner but at Highbury when mr drink was around we had 13 world class players and Highbury now emirates we have maybe 3 or 4 or 5 tops, world class players and guess wat we can't even keep them oh my dear friends it don't feel rite I find myself losing my arsenal my life I can not believe spurs are above us and how we use tear them to shreds our kids use ta, who cares if Sanchez goes we will not win da league with Stan there he just wants pump cash in to shooting poor animals well to me ur the animal and ur taking a sleeping giant in to the jungle?

I'm sorry to disagree on this but unless it is physically possible for us to ascertain a WC striker, or at the very least, a striker who offers something vastly different, then there is NO point wasting money on them.

In that case a win or loss there means we at least had a run for our money, that's my hope and dream for this season.

When most people start betting on games I've found there are usually two different outcomes that happen, you either: A. Get lucky and start off winning way more than you should, wonder why you didn't start sooner and think you can finally buy that Winnebago you've always had you're eye on or B. Get unlucky, lose every game and wonder why you didn't just light your money on fire so you could at least heat your home.

There'd surely be huge money involved, and it all makes sense, at least conceptually.

There was money, spend it and ensure trophies not just Fa cup for at least the next few seasons, players stay happy and decide to stay.

we will need to be fighting for the title at least this season, not more excuses the money is there to spend and the stadium debt is comfortable, l as long as wenger get the players we need (big benz).

There is virtually no risk for DJ, and if Dillashaw doesn't make weight (I don't recall him ever missing at 135 at least), DJ makes some sweet money without getting punched in the face, something he wants to avoid at all costs.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

At least we now know that the deluded one has had # 250 million available, for the past 4 season's to spend on transfers... (Thanks to Gazidis latest comments) Add them facts to Wenger's denial of not having that kind of budget, along with his words of treating the club as if it belongs to him, in other words he doesn't like spending money (The man is sooo tight that there's no bubbles when he farts in the bath)??

Nottingham Forest The Tricky Trees may be routinely sweeping aside the opposition with the sort of free - flowing football any neutral fan would be happy to pay good money to see (or at least they were until Saturday's defeat by — of all teams — Derby), but there's a potential fly in the ointment: the thinness of their squad, particularly by comparison with their main promotion rivals ourselves and West Brom.

Its nice to see some people have open there eyes but all is true lets ask our selves have this team change from last season where are the experienced players that wenger talked about he selling us bull and every season he gets away with it the fans deserve better am from the caribbean so chance r i might never get to see arsenal live at the emirates because its too expensive at least the club should be winning things i know its important to balance the books you must BUT football is about trophies as well and thats were the balance lies how the hell can we go Six (6) seasons yes 6 without a trophy not even a FA cup or carling cup and no one says a word about the manager that is rubbish Arsenal live in the past too much the time is now this season for me is the absolute last for wenger to win something i do nt care how much money he has made the club and Wenger if you cant bring that then go work for an oil company and make them money and leave arsenal to a manager who is willing to win something not only buy players for 10 million who take 10 years to develop am frustrated with this man.

At least they are entering value for money, but they are favourites to win this duel at St James Park on Sunday but they will have to overturn some form there as they haven't won on any of their last three visits to Tyneside.

There seems to be a kind of bitter justice about a club which has spent fortunes on star players being, metaphorically at least, out of the money.