Not exact matches
In science, a theory is a collection of scientifically verified hypotheses that together form a complex
understanding of at
least loosely related physical
phenomena.
If, for instance, my encounter with another's love should vouchsafe to me a new
understanding of self, what happens is by no means restricted to consciousness, at
least if consciousness is to be taken as a psychic rather than as an existential
phenomenon, which is what Thielicke and others wrongly suppose.
And I don't
understand this, or at
least, I think it needs some further explanation: «Colours and colour relationships, in so far as they create light, do refer to
phenomena of the natural world».
Pfeffer (contributor to the sea level chapter 13) was the
least hysterical, pointing out that the AR5 increase in projected SL rise over AR4 is mostly a result of having incorporated «rapid dynamic ice loss», a
phenomenon that is not yet well
understood.
On the other hand, because applying design to work traditionally done by lawyers is a rather new
phenomenon, it may be necessary to speak of legal design (at
least in the short term) so that people
understand what we're talking about.
The problem with many of our
understandings of psychological
phenomena, not
least in the field of addiction, is that we are mired in a dualistic
understanding of the world.
They dig into the
phenomenon of parental alienation to provide a deeper
understanding of why people find and marry people who will eventually alienate their children from them, how the alienating parents «sell» the poisonous message to the children, and how — sometimes when it seems
least likely — the alienated children and their lost parents find their way back to each other.
It has been proposed that empathy is a multi-faceted
phenomenon that can be fractionated into at
least three forms: cognitive empathy (
understanding others» mental states / emotion recognition), affective empathy (feeling the same emotion as another person), and motor empathy (mirroring others» body movements and facial expressions; Blair 2005).