Who are your future customers — and competitors?While you may not be able to thoroughly test the market potential for your business concept, you should at
least understand who your likely customers are and what kind of competition you would face.
The story in the first film was incredibly convoluted, but at
least we understood who everyone was and what their motivations were.
I have been attempting to learn Bayesian techniques sufficiently in order to apply it or at
least understand those who write about its applications.
There's the hard news that I already care about and have been following long enough that I at
least understand who the main players are (U.S. politics, for instance).
Not exact matches
A lot has been written about HSAs from a consumer perspective, but one of their
least -
understood benefits is that they provide a little security to the person
who wants to take the entrepreneurial leap.
Even if you don't find employees at these industry events, you will at
least make contacts
who understand your needs and will put you in touch with other people they know.
Another Reddit user responded: «I
understand that some people genuinely have to limit their salt intake as much as possible (McDonald's isn't really the best place to practice that sort of diet, but hey, not my life) but for me, at
least, it's easy to tell
who genuinely needs it salt free and
who's just trying to get the freshest fries they can.»
TechCrunch
understands that at
least half a dozen companies
who raised money via ICOs and each have $ 500 million or more in total coin market cap — i.e. the total value of all of their crypto coins — have plans to invest in other blockchain projects via seed - or early - stage style deals.
Fortunately, the type of annuity you're asking about — an immediate annuity — is (by annuity standards at
least) the easiest to
understand and, to my mind the type with the greatest potential for helping people
who want more guaranteed lifetime income than Social Security alone will provide.
I'll be quite happy if at
least stocks are being held by those
who understand the full narrative of the recent half - cycle, and have seen, considered, and discarded our work.
and yeah, as we saw in regards to CDOs, sometimes even the big heads
who structure those vehicles don't really
understand them (but at
least they are usually smart enough not to put their own money in it).
Senators —
who began work on this report with the endorsement of the federal finance minister — recommend the government delay implementing any proposed changes for at
least a year so that private corporations have the time to
understand the impact these will have on their business.
As we did in our annual, more global study, we spent a good deal of time in this research looking at the differences between the marketers
who rate themselves highly in terms of overall content marketing effectiveness (the «most effective») versus those
who rate themselves as
least effective to
understand the gaps and identify best practices for paid content promotion.
Your article was the first thing I read this Sunday morning before going to church and I wanted to extend a special «THANKS» not only for the support you provide to those
who actually need it most but also for your wonderful message for those family members
who think they need to hear and
understand it the
least.
I speak to myself often so that I know I am talking to at
least one person
who truly
understands Jesus» truth.
Most of them said they wished, in retrospect, that they had voted for Hillary Clinton
who «at
least understood that the economy... it's the economy, right?
This sort of thing goes back at
least to the time of St. Paul —
who, I
understand, had a difficult time with his parishes in Corinth and Galatia.
Anyway, maybe this material will help readers in expanding their context (or at
least in
understanding my opinion) on why the calling out of those
who may be considered Commenders could help bring light and resolution to questions about Emergent Village system toxicity.
The man
who chooses to live in our destiny can neither know the reality of God's presence nor
understand the world as his creation; or, at
least, he can no longer respond — either interiorly or cognitively — to the classical Christian images of the Creator and the creation.
I can
understand the idea of a party as a unifier and people can group together, but the way parties are set up now, it just fuels fringe elements
who don't speak for the moderates
who are forced to affiliate with one of two parties in order to feel at
least sort of relevant.
For evangelizing, in its essence, is taking the authentic Christian gospel (albeit with the limitations of human
understanding) through word or deed to those
who need it and are at
least prepared enough to take a look at it.
I get all kinds of «hate mail» for loving Muslims the way I would want to be loved which is to get an
understanding of Islam from people
who are at
least sympathetic if not ardent supporters of the faith.
As a more or less libertarian, I'm used to having tom explain economics 101 stuff to liberals, but lately it seems it's the conservatives
who least understand the markets they claim to support.
Scholars
who study religion and the family such as Lisa Cahill, Mark Jordan and Adrian Thatcher tend to search for common ground or at
least for greater
understanding of the complexities.
But to
understand, at
least in part, is to be strengthened in the knowledge of our own capacity for both good and evil» and of our radical dependence on the One
who, despite His
understanding all, forgives the penitent.
Well... I'm done reading your crappy reports and comment sections CNN, you've successfully turned another educated person away, and what do you care honestly, every time you turn away someone
who understands logic and reason, you bring in 10 more lowly people with degrees from state college (I mean, «yes, they're ph.ds, but from state college??? that shouldn't really count, or at
least should be considered the equivalent of a masters degree at a good school).
And if I want to know what theology to read, I'm going take the word of someone
who seems to at
least understand what they read enough to summarize it in a meaningful way...
and Study it from top to bottom with all the references, If you know how to
understand the bible, even in the
least,
who ever reads this in ernest will have their eyes open to how many False teacher are out there.
Atheist
who do nt have a believe at
least should
understand and respect that others do and not offend them.
sounds more like «corporate brainstorming», but what I was trying to suggest is that it appears that we're witnessing (not intentionally) an evolving
understanding of what wd become more central to the narrative and eventually orthodox.That is, if you cdn't believe it, you were out the door.A good example wd be the higher Christology that the fourth gospel reflects and more specifically, the virgin birth which it (like Mark and Paul) doesn't mention.If the birth narratives that we're familiar with are absent from the earliest gospel and the most theological gospel that came decades later, and can only be found in the other two gospels that we know used the first, it at
least suggests a growing and evolving
understanding of
who Jesus «was» and «is».
Then my identity no longer derives from things or from the attitudes of others but, to some degree at
least, stems from a clearer
understanding of the truth of my relationship to God; and this
understanding can sharply decrease the fear generated by ignorance of
who I really am.
Yet, on closer examination, the lives and deaths of Alba Mery Chilito Peñafiel and Alicia Castilla not only illustrate the carnage their country has endured, but also one of its
least -
understood aspects: Despite belonging to an overwhelming statistical majority, Christians in Colombia
who stand up to the violence are remarkably at risk.
In my view there is at
least today a distinct experience and teaching in Catholic theology according to which God must be
understood as the all - efficient Giver
who gives himself both the potency of freedom and its good act according to his grace that is neither derived nor compelled, and which nothing in man precedes.
There are at
least three familiar ways, or models, to imagine the difference Jesus in his passion can make for terrible situations like that of Sam and his family: 1) evil as punishment; 2) perfection through suffering; 3) Jesus as the fellow sufferer
who understands.
But I think it will challenge both those
who are pro-gay and not... to
understand why the desire to be right, or to at
least be justified in your beliefs is so damn strong.
The reason Rabshakeh advances is ridiculous and shows in effect that the natural man has no
understanding, like twentieth - century man,
who finds some Protestants more acceptable because they at
least do not believe in stupid miracles, in the nativity and the resurrection!
Perhaps there are sundry persons
who do not in the
least understand the difficulty I have in mind.
We need at
least a significant minority
who have tried to
understand the deep history of the great cultures of the world.
Murray needs to read Alasdair MacIntyre,
who doesn't have much of a solution either, but
who at
least understands the profundity of our cultural brokenness.
With that background in mind, they also have every right to feel a sense of insensitivity from Muslims and any other person
who wouldn't at
least understand them when they oppose the building of a structure that reminds them of the evil that those individuals cause on that fateful day.
Ok, let's forget about scientific explanations for a minute and turn to those people
who REALLY know and
understand the text of the Hebrew Bible - Orthodox Jews or, at the very
least, Talmudic scholars.
I don't think anyone
who's seen war or at
least understands a part of it ever really wants it.
If I
understand his thesis correctly, it is very similar to what I have argued here — that the Old Testament must be interpreted in light of the New and that, at
least occasionally, reports in the Old Testament (about what God commanded people to do) must be relativized in light of the character of God revealed in Jesus Christ
who is the Word of God in person.»
The beliefs are just so far out there for me, that whenever I see someone in ardent support of them I have to think they're a troll, because I don't know how they could possibly believe or accept that (there are a few exceptions of people
who pt things very well, cite supporting evidence, and are consistent and coherent - I don't agree with them, but I can at
least understand what they're saying)
It'll get the Liberal lemmings foaming at the mouth, at
least the ones
who understand it.
«Whatever happened to the recognition that a university education has at
least three purposes: helping one
understand who they are and what excites and motivates them; helping
understand one's relationship to the greater world; and, also, becoming prepared for a job.»
If this then is to be
understood bluntly, just as a matter of course, without the
least reservation, to be taken quite unconcernedly and flippantly — then, if paganism's poetic fiction about the gods might be called human craziness, Christianity might be the invention of a crazy god; such a doctrine could only occur to a god
who had lost his wits — so a man must judge
who had kept his wits.
He'll be wanted by at
least 10 clubs
who actually have ambition to win something and if he leaves I'd
understand it.
We have to
understand the fact if we spend 120 million on a 18 year old kid
who looks very promising by all standards we would be looking at
least for a 7 year contract.
You might not like him any more when you finish reading it, but you will at
least understand him, and it's going to take
understanding to fully process
who he was,
who he is, and
who he hopes to be before his Baseball career comes to an end.