Sentences with phrase «leave citizens in a state»

Not exact matches

Last month, the U.S. State Department updated its travel warning on Turkey, ordering family members of consulate employees in Istanbul to leave the country, citing threats against U.S. citizens.

Without scientists and engineers to create new technologies and ways of doing society's business, other economies in other countries will out - compete the United States and leave our citizens behind.

With the repatriation of all its citizens now impossible — particularly the most vocal opposition activists who left Rwanda in the post-1998 period and were thus unaffected (in theory) by the Clause's implementation — the Rwandan government shifted its approach to generously support a range of other initiatives and durable solutions in refugee - hosting states, for example the provision of passports to Rwandan refugees abroad from visiting delegations.

But now, there appears to be a new emerging thinking on the left that is now beginning to challenge inequalities of power in relation to the citizen and welfare state, which were once believed to be inevitable by social democrats.

But many states offer meager financial support to their guardianship system, leaving some of the country's most vulnerable citizens without a guardian and in a perpetual limbo.

Regarding Citizens Property Insurance, homeowners will get more information in the future when deciding if they should voluntarily leave that state - run insurer for a private company.Under HB 931, homeowners will get new details on all potential offers to switch to private carriers and Citizens itself will be responsible for mailing them, instead of leaving it to private companies, because customers have often mistaken what they receive as junk mail.

What is needed instead is a fundamental shift in direction in federal education policy, and ESSA is not it; therefore every family that can afford it should opt out of state schooling whenever possible until No Child Left Behind's failed strategy for social improvement via annual testing and publishing the results is abandoned entirely, and until Sacramento gets serious about subsidiary devolution, which implies that assessing and reporting on the results of local schools should be left to the local districts, whose citizens may have different priorities and values that the state and federal governments should learn to respLeft Behind's failed strategy for social improvement via annual testing and publishing the results is abandoned entirely, and until Sacramento gets serious about subsidiary devolution, which implies that assessing and reporting on the results of local schools should be left to the local districts, whose citizens may have different priorities and values that the state and federal governments should learn to respleft to the local districts, whose citizens may have different priorities and values that the state and federal governments should learn to respect.

The only question left is what can we do as citizens, parents and teachers to restore school funding here in Washington state.

The Texas - exclusive model happens to be RAM's best - selling truck in the state, although citizens of the other 49 oughtn't necessarily feel left out; it's essentially a RAM 1500 Big Horn with special badging, putting it one slot above the bare - bones, work - focused Tradesman model.

I hope that someone can either answer or point me toward a competent professional for my situation: I am a born and raised American citizen who left the states in 1993, after filing taxes once as a...

Latin Songbirds depicts «three left - leaning Latin American leaders who are trying to reverse a history of rule by wealthy oligarchies, reject the U.S.'s and IMF's neoliberal economic policies, take control of their own resources, and improve the lives of their citizens, especially in the areas of literacy, health care, and economic well - being,» states artist Christa Maiwald.

Try telling India to leave its coal in the ground after examining the latest data on per capita emissions of carbon dioxide from the Global Carbon Project, released yesterday — with India's billion - plus citizens at 1.9 tons of CO2 emitted per person per year, the European Union and China tied (for the moment) at around 7 tons and the United States at 16.4 tons:

I have recently unintentionally noticed that the UV radiation is killing the leafs of trees and plants the most exposed leaves to the sun are dying on many types of vegetation plus we have fires hazing the sky up which means more CO2 thanks to grindall61 (A YouTube channel) I hope I am spelling it correctly he goes to meetings in Southern California and records them we know that the state of California is because increasingly aggressive in reducing greenhouse gases even to the extremes of renting bikes and of course climate change is going to be used as an excuse to take away our rights don't fall for there wickedness but how can a serious state like California at least that's what I'm calling it here claim to want to fight climate change yet being ignorant on climate engineering this is a joke citizens stand up for your country.

In the United States the magistrates are not elected by a particular class of citizens, but by the majority of the nation; as they are the immediate representatives of the passions of the multitude and are wholly dependent upon its pleasure, they excite neither hatred nor fear; hence, as I have already shown, very little care has been taken to limit their authority, and they are left in possession of a vast amount of arbitrary poweIn the United States the magistrates are not elected by a particular class of citizens, but by the majority of the nation; as they are the immediate representatives of the passions of the multitude and are wholly dependent upon its pleasure, they excite neither hatred nor fear; hence, as I have already shown, very little care has been taken to limit their authority, and they are left in possession of a vast amount of arbitrary powein possession of a vast amount of arbitrary power.

In the report's final paragraph, the authors state that this information leaves citizens and governments with a choice:

Rottmann is dealing with the different issue of where a Member State is withdrawing nationality (whereas the UK, when leaving the EU, wouldn't be depriving UK citizens of their UK nationality) such as would in that circumstance, and perhaps only in that circumstance, result in a loss of EU citizenship.

When Britain leaves the EU there will be several million citizens of other Member States living in the UK, and probably around a million UK citizens living elsewhere in the EU.

In Dereci, the Court held that denial of the «genuine enjoyment of the substance of rights» referred to situations in which the Union citizen has to leave not only his or her own Member State, but the territory of the Union as a wholIn Dereci, the Court held that denial of the «genuine enjoyment of the substance of rights» referred to situations in which the Union citizen has to leave not only his or her own Member State, but the territory of the Union as a wholin which the Union citizen has to leave not only his or her own Member State, but the territory of the Union as a whole.

Currently, EU citizens are exempted from the provisions of the Immigration Act 1988 by section 7 (1), which states: «[a] person shall not under the principal Act require leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom in any case in which he is entitled to do by virtue of an enforceable Community [Union] rights or of any provisions made under section 2 (2) of the European Communities Act 1972».

I take leave to say that the New York statute, in the particulars here involved, can not be held to be in conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment without enlarging the scope of the Amendment far beyond its original purpose and without bringing under the supervision of this court matters which have been supposed to belong exclusively to the legislative departments of the several States when exerting their conceded power to guard the health and safety of their citizens by such regulations as they in their wisdom deem best.

International law can not stop China from exercising its power to prevent its citizens from leaving China, whether in the case of a STEM genius bound for the United States or in any other case.

«The Constitution (of the United States) makes no provision for protecting the citizens of the respective States in their religious liberties; this is left to the State constitutions and laws; nor is there any inhibition imposed by the Constitution of the United States in this respect on the States.»

It is useful because it is honest; because it leaves not even the most obscure and friendless citizen without means of obtaining justice from a neighbouring State; because it obviates occasions of quarrels between States on account of the claims of their respective citizens; because it recognizes and strongly rests on this great moral truth that justice is the same whether due from one man or a million, or from a million to one man; because it teaches and greatly appreciates the value of our free republican national government, which places all our citizens on an equal footing, and enables each and every of them to obtain justice without any danger of being overborne by the weight and number of their opponents; and because it brings into action and enforces this great and glorious principle — that the people are the sovereign of this country, and consequently that fellow citizens and joint sovereigns can not be degraded by appearing with each other in their own courts to have their controversies determined.

52 However, the mere fact that it might appear desirable, for economic reasons or in order to preserve the family unit in the territory of the Union, for members of a family consisting of third country nationals and a Union citizen who is a minor to be able to reside with that citizen in the territory of the Union in the Member State of which he is a national is not sufficient in itself to support the view that the Union citizen would be forced to leave the territory of the Union if such a right of residence were not granted (see, to that effect, Dereci and Others, paragraph 68).

(21) However, it should be left to the host Member State to decide whether it will grant social assistance during the first three months of residence, or for a longer period in the case of job - seekers, to Union citizens other than those who are workers or self - employed persons or who retain that status or their family members, or maintenance assistance for studies, including vocational training, prior to acquisition of the right of permanent residence, to these same persons.»

47 The criterion of the denial of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by the status of citizen of the Union referred, in the Ruiz Zambrano and Dereci and Others cases, to situations characterised by the circumstance that the Union citizen had, in fact, to leave not only the territory of the Member State of which he was a national but also that of the European Union as a whole.

As the Advocate General observes in point 44 of his Opinion, it is the relationship of dependency between the Union citizen who is a minor and the third country national who is refused a right of residence that is liable to jeopardise the effectiveness of Union citizenship, since it is that dependency that would lead to the Union citizen being obliged, in fact, to leave not only the territory of the Member State of which he is a national but also that of the European Union as a whole, as a consequence of such a refusal (see Ruiz Zambrano, paragraphs 43 and 45, and Dereci and Others, paragraphs 65 to 67).

46 With respect, finally, to the right of residence of a person who is a third country national in the Member State of residence of his minor children, nationals of that Member State, who are dependant on him and of whom he and his spouse have joint custody, the Court has held that the refusal to grant a right of residence would have the consequence that those children, who are citizens of the Union, would have to leave the territory of the Union in order to accompany their parents, and that those citizens of the Union would, in fact, be unable to exercise the substance of the rights conferred by their status (Ruiz Zambrano, paragraphs 43 and 44).

First, since Ms S and Ms L have sole custody of the Union citizens concerned who are minors, a decision by them to leave the territory of the Member State of which those children are nationals, in order to preserve the family unit, would have the effect of depriving those Union citizens of all contact with their biological fathers, should such contact have been maintained up to the present.

Phillips wrote in his motion filed earlier this year that without a state court class action procedure, Mississippi «citizens and businesses are often left with no economically viable way to adjudicate contractual disputes in the Mississippi state court system.»