Sentences with phrase «leave money on the table in»

If you know a coach I should interview for this column for insight or a software platform I need to look into or if I'm leaving money on the table in a glaringly obvious way, shoot me a line!

Indeed, it appears that eHarmony excludes certain people from their dating pool, leaving money on the table in the process, presumably because the algorithm concludes that such individuals are poor relationship material.

Specifically, the IG said NSF has been leaving money on the table in negotiating agreements for individual IPAs with the home institution.

Because books physically degrade at different rates, and ebooks don't, publishers are sensitive to the ebook distribution terms, lest they leave money on the table in the long run.

Not exact matches

He's since written a book called Social Media is Bullshit, in which he trumpets real - world experiences over virtual ones: «The idea that you're «leaving money on the table» by not using [social media] is patently false.»

If you haven't updated your CRM in a while or are still using the same intelligence technology you installed 5 years ago, you're leaving money on the table.

Yet, while Scotiabank says it voluntarily curtailed its mortgage business, leading to flat growth in the most recent quarter, it's unlikely to pull back on the reins too hard for fear of losing market share to competitors and leaving money on the table.

It would be in their best interest to realize that their continued participation leaves money on the table since someone else can increase the value of the company more than they can, thereby increasing the value of their shares.»

He «left money on the table,» as the saying goes, and that money stayed in the pockets of his fans.

This leaves more money on the table to stash in the business savings account and invest back into the business.

If your employer offers to match your 401k contributions to a certain percentage and you don't opt in, you're leaving free money on the table.

In either instance, you could be leaving money on the table if you leave a 401 (k) with a former employer or ignore an IRA.

«I set up this company because I didn't want to see my nieces, who at the time were between 14 and 22, having the same conversations in their 40s about how much money they had left on the table that so many of my friends were having.»

Since then, he's run over a dozen websites of his own, and is a frequent consultant to some of the biggest online marketers in the business, where he shows them how to capture the vast sums of money they're leaving on the table.

Failure to talk about money in a sales meeting will lead to one of two negative outcomes: shocking prospects with a price they could never afford or leaving money on the table by presenting a price that's far too low.

See Ilona Babenko and Richard Sen, «Money Left on the Table: An Analysis of Participation in Employee Stock Purchase Plans, Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014): 3658 - 3698; 4) Stock held after the exercise of granted stock options or grants of restricted stock.

Just to chime in from the «Conversion Optimization» session from the previous day of the show, if you're spending money on paid search marketing and you're not actively managing / optimizing your landing pages, you're leaving money on the table.

They accept excessive risk in overvalued markets because they fear «leaving money on the table.»

At Fidelity, we believe that you should consider contributing the full amount of 401 (k) elective deferral contributions required to receive the maximum employer match offered in your workplace retirement plan as your first priority, rather than leaving that money on the table.

In fact, when it comes to its very limited edition supercars like the LaFerrari, Ferrari's million dollar plus sale prices still leave a lot of money on the table for its elite cadre of customers who see the resale value of their cars rise to multiples of their purchase price.

But if this scenario arises in your betting future, our goal is to encourage you to test both wager types in order to find the optimum payout and not leave money on the table.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

However, that doesn't mean you should leave money on the table, and the Westgate Superbook in Las Vegas has released their odds for the men and women's field hockey tournaments.

Mexico's LigaMX is the top football league in North America, and they are leaving money on the table when making their TV deals.

With Taylor's contract running out in the summer, Leeds would risk leaving a large sum of money on the table if Taylor does not re-sign with the club.

«When we asked him [Mallam Issa] he said he left the money on his wife's table... So every minute he would change the story... at one time he told me, Cudjoe Fianoo and the late Mr. Owusu Ansah that the money is in Ghana and there was no cause for alarm.http: / / ghanapoliticsonline.com

As Capital has reported, there was money left on the table in earlier competitive funding processes for education programs, which could also be part of a new funding stream for pre-K.

[4] CBO also assumes a similarly modest increase in FY 2019 rather than the 3.0 percent increase allowed under the budget deal, but our assumption here is that Congress will spend up to its statutory limit rather than leaving money on the table.

That is one reason why even experienced stockbrokers often sell stocks while they are still increasing in value, leaving money on the table rather than risking a loss.

Some days the ball lands on the money and others I leave the table in despair.

Yes, but all of those movies left money on the table for not being in 3D.

Download Money Left on the Table: An Analysis of Pell Grant Receipt Among Financially - Eligible Community College Students in California

For my money, I'd leave the AWD on the table — it's not super-necessary out here in California, though I'd probably feel differently if I lived in Colorado or some other snowy state.

To that we'd add: Rolls - Royce was leaving money on the table without an SUV, crossover, or tall wagon for customers in the Middle East, Russia, Asia and the Americas, the home of big SUVs.

This unstoppable niche is popular fiction... and if you aren't publishing in this niche, you're leaving money on the table.

Are you leaving money on the table if you only publish in...

If you're an indie author, maybe you didn't realize that you're leaving a pile of money on the virtual table by just selling your book in ebook and maybe print format.

I do a couple of these things already, mostly out of habit (as some of you know, I was a professional blogger / content creator for my day job before I could make a living from my fiction, and I watched what a lot of the internet marketing gurus were doing, even if I never fully immersed myself in that world), and because it just makes sense not to leave money on the table.

I might sell as many books at $ 14.99 as I would at $ 9.99, because I might have motivated buyers, in which case Amazon would be forcing me to leave money on the table.

ComiXology said, «Consider us another distribution channel,» and in that case, not doing it through comiXology would be leaving money on the table.

There are obviously many reasons why we leave money on the table: We're not always great savers in the first place; we're given too many choices and become overwhelmed; sometimes we simply don't understand our benefits; and, of course, there's just plain old inertia.

One in four misses out on receiving a full match by not saving enough, leaving an estimated $ 1,366 of free money on the table, according to research by Financial Engines, which provides investment advice for workplace retirement plans.

There's little wisdom in leaving money on the table.

In other words, they are leaving precious money on the table!

I wish I had gotten started on investing in college, the money I left on the table by not doing so just irks me to think about.

We know that, at least by some methods of accounting, we're leaving money on the table — and probably paying more in the short term than we would through something like a lower - interest loan.

The research in the financial literature demonstrates that you are leaving some money on the table with DG investing.

My answer is: «Yes, sometimes the market continues in the direction it was going before we got out, and we might have left some money on the table.

In either instance, you could be leaving money on the table if you leave a 401 (k) with a former employer or ignore an IRA.

Not putting that money to work in investments or your retirement accounts means you're leaving opportunities to grow your wealth on the table.