While still
leaving district flexibility, Iowa should articulate minimum guidelines for a high - quality induction experience.
Alabama can still
leave districts flexibility in determining layoff policies, but it should do so within a framework that ensures that classroom performance is considered.
While still
leaving districts the flexibility to establish their own pay scale, Oregon should articulate policies that definitively discourage districts from tying compensation to advanced degrees, in light of the extensive research showing that such degrees generally do not have an impact on teacher effectiveness.
While
leaving districts flexibility to decide their own pay scales, states should promote compensation tied to teacher effectiveness and discourage districts from basing pay solely on criteria not correlated with teacher effectiveness.
While still
leaving districts the flexibility to establish their own pay scale, Maryland should articulate policies that definitively discourage districts from tying compensation to advanced degrees, in light of the extensive research showing that such degrees do not have an impact on teacher effectiveness.
While still
leaving districts the flexibility to establish their own pay scale, Michigan should articulate policies that definitively discourage districts from tying compensation to advanced degrees, in light of the extensive research showing that such degrees do not have an impact on teacher effectiveness.
While still
leaving districts the flexibility to establish their own pay scale, New Jersey should articulate policies that definitively discourage districts from tying compensation to advanced degrees, in light of the extensive research showing that such degrees do not have an impact on teacher effectiveness.
While still
leaving districts flexibility, Maryland should articulate minimum guidelines for a high - quality induction experience.
Idaho can still
leave districts flexibility in determining layoff policies, but it should do so within a framework that ensures that classroom performance is considered.
While still
leaving districts the flexibility to establish their own pay scale, Wyoming should articulate policies that definitively discourage districts from tying compensation to advanced degrees, in light of the extensive research showing that such degrees do not have an impact on teacher effectiveness.
Not exact matches
Leon County School Superintendent Rocky Hanna says that will
leave the
district with little
flexibility to put money toward other priorities.
Waiver: Comprehensive
flexibility that the U.S. Department of Education has granted to more than 40 states and the
District of Columbia from key requirements of the No Child
Left Behind Act (the current version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act) in exchange for embracing certain Obama administration education - redesign priorities on teachers, testing, standards, and school turnarounds.
Requiring «highly qualified early educators,» dedicating existing federal funds for an early - education matching - grant program, and giving
districts more
flexibility to use Title I money for pre-K-3 programs are some of the major recommendations in a report on revamping the federal No Child
Left Behind Act to improve schooling for younger children.
He supported the No Child
Left Behind law (NCLB), but also called for dramatic increases in spending to help schools meet the law's targets, and additional
flexibility for
districts like his own.
The CORE
Districts are a collaboration of large urban school districts in California that began measuring social - emotional skills, including Growth Mindset, as part of an innovative multiple - measures data system under a No Child Left Behind flexibility
Districts are a collaboration of large urban school
districts in California that began measuring social - emotional skills, including Growth Mindset, as part of an innovative multiple - measures data system under a No Child Left Behind flexibility
districts in California that began measuring social - emotional skills, including Growth Mindset, as part of an innovative multiple - measures data system under a No Child
Left Behind
flexibility request.
The Department of Education announced last week another in a series of policy changes designed to give states and school
districts additional
flexibility in meeting requirements in the No Child
Left Behind Act.
The U.S. Department of Education's plan to grant states broad
flexibility under the No Child
Left Behind Act will free up as much as $ 800 million in money school
districts now must set aside for tutoring students, but may mark a significant financial blow to an education industry that has grown up around serving low - performing schools.
[I] t's possible to set national goals and standards — even establish a national assessment program — and still
leave a tremendous amount of
flexibility for states and local school
districts.»
The
flexibility means mandates under No Child
Left Behind, like a free tutoring program in the Rochester City School
District known as Supplemental Educational Services, will no longer be required.
The U.S. Department of Education on Thursday denied a request by the state's top education official to extend a
flexibility waiver under the No Child
Left Behind Act, a decision that will place restrictions on nearly $ 30 million in annual federal funding for local school
districts beginning with the 2015 - 2016 school year.
While still
leaving districts with the
flexibility to determine their own pay scales, Virginia should encourage
districts to incorporate mechanisms such as starting these teachers at a higher salary than other new teachers.
ESSA replaces No Child
Left Behind, and provides states,
districts and schools with increased
flexibility over how to use funding, how to demonstrate student progress and achievement and how to improve school performance and narrow the opportunity gap, among other changes.
Eight large urban school
districts in California will open the school year with new
flexibility to reduce the emphasis on standardized tests and set their own standards for student success, under an unprecedented waiver from the No Child
Left Behind Act that the U.S. Department of Education granted on Tuesday.
While still
leaving local school
districts the
flexibility to establish their own pay scale, the
District of Columbia should articulate policies that definitively discourage them from tying compensation to advanced degrees, in light of the extensive research showing that such degrees do not have an impact on teacher effectiveness.
While still
leaving local school
districts with the
flexibility to determine their own pay scales, the
District of Columbia should encourage them to incorporate mechanisms such as starting these teachers at a higher salary than other new teachers.
So with
flexibility in mind,
district administrators
left little untouched when they handed the school board a long list of possibilities for cuts.
While good in theory, SES had many implementation problems, 12 including low participation rates and lack of quality control.13 In some
districts, there were scandals involving providers overcharging
districts, hiring tutors with criminal records, or violating federal regulations.14 In all
districts, SES siphoned off Title I funds,
leaving less for other important Title I programs.15 The tutoring program was eventually phased out as the Department of Education began implementing «ESEA
Flexibility,» 16 also known as waivers, and it was scrapped all together under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).17
Of those, 16 schools have
left the
District's Special Education Local Plan Area (SELPA) to gain the necessary access to special education programmatic
flexibility.