You know you've been on Christian internet too long when you see a «Switch to Progressive» ad and think it's about
leaving fundamentalism.
But
leaving fundamentalism doesn't mean leaving behind your self - respect or your commitment to imitating Christ.
No crisis of faith upon
leaving fundamentalism, as many of us have undergone — just a new line of work.
The psychology of religion studied adolescent conversions before it asked why the psychologist
left fundamentalism and became a Quaker, an Episcopalian, or a Unitarian.
When
we left fundamentalism nine years ago, I was overdue for a massive rebellion.
But I've known many people to
leave fundamentalism only to make a string of bad choices that alienate them from God, themselves, and other people.
Not exact matches
The BioLogos position on origins sits partway between two
fundamentalisms: on the «
left» end of the spectrum is the
fundamentalism of people like Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett who are committed to the belief that the only reliable form of knowledge comes from science, and that alternate ways of knowing must be either rejected entirely or completely subordinated to science.
Evangelicalism, in this paradigm, is now no longer a distinct theological tradition (i.e., «Reformation Christianity,» though it tends to be dominated by a «Reformed» articulation of Christian faith) or a particular piety and ethos (as it tended to be in classical evangelicalism) but has become a theological position staked out between conservative neo-orthodoxy and
fundamentalism on a spectrum from
left to right that is defined essentially by degrees of accommodation to modernity.
This was not true for me, and it is not true for many of the young adults who
leave college with questions about science, philosophy, politics, and religious pluralism that challenge the
fundamentalism with which they were raised.
My friend Adele describes
fundamentalism as holding so tightly to your beliefs that you fingernails
leave imprints on the palm of your hand.
While we must
leave it for Muslims to deal with the threat of
fundamentalism to the faith of Islam, we can not avoid becoming involved when Muslim
fundamentalism affects the relationships between the Islamic world and that of the Christian West.
It must be
left to Muslims to refute Islamic
fundamentalism by showing how Islam can best come to terms with the challenge of modernity.
when I first started reading up on how extreme Christian
fundamentalism has become in the last 30 yrs (since I
left Evangelicalism), I was stunned to find that there is a whole movement afoot to keep children, especially girls, from attending college — yes, even BJU — for fear of them being «indoctrinated» with «liberal ideas».
In fact, the categories of «
left» and «right» simply may not help much in identifying the probable directions of
fundamentalism.
Rather,
fundamentalism tends to oppose pluralism, preferring authoritarian social structures, whether of the right or the
left.
At moments Sweeney seems to be trying too hard to be gentle with his heritage, but he offers a memorable look at the way
fundamentalism — for good and for ill — shapes a life long after its tenets have been
left behind.
This
leave - taking and reorienting is a common path, one followed by many who are drawn to
fundamentalism at certain moments in their lives.
It is impossible to predict whether
fundamentalism will be
left - wing or right - wing.
So we are
left with «unequivocal» Church teaching, explicitly based on texts which ought not to be cited since they are «unhelpful» and suggestive of «
fundamentalism» (whatever that means), and with no real elaboration of why the Church teaches what it does on this important matter.
Today religious
fundamentalism dominates the religious scene in the US and to a lesser extent elsewhere,
leaving the main - line churches with depleted membership and waning influence.
A pioneer of talk radio, McIntyre and his faithful sidekick, «Amen Charlie,» became familiar voices to thousands of listeners across America as the «P.T. Barnum of American
Fundamentalism»» blasting everything and everyone who wiggled even slightly to the
left.
He is convinced that there exists an obvious instrument for putting social democracy into practice - the central national state, whose strength has been underestimated, he argues, in a rush of market
fundamentalism on both
left and right.
The rest of the European
Left never quite went the neo con distance that Blair et al took the Labour Party, but with a few honourable exceptions, the political surrender to free market
fundamentalism drove many of the social democratic parties to run up the white flag.
While home schooling may have particular appeal to celebrities, over the last decade families of all kinds have embraced the practice for widely varying reasons: no longer is home schooling exclusive to Christian
fundamentalism and the countercultural
Left.
I agree completely that strict religious
fundamentalism is not, in and of itself, generally part of the
left.
What we are seeing is the emergence of «scientific
fundamentalism» married quite often to extreme
left and «back to medieval utopia» beliefs.