Sentences with phrase «leaving money on the table because»

* This is the point where I admit that I might be leaving money on the table because I don't experiment all that much.

al. are just tax shelters, get the money and figure out what to do with it, but don't leave money on the table because the maximum capacity of your usual tax shelter is smaller.

Too many attorneys, and not just attorneys but other professionals and all marketers generally, I think, believe that they are leaving money on the table because they niche down too much.

If you're not focused on conversions, you're leaving money on the table because of a poor conversion rate — and — you're not ranking as well as you should.

You're so excited to be offered anything that you sell yourself short, leaving money on the table because you fear the offer will be taken away.

Not exact matches

Still, the massive price increase means that Mulesoft left money on the table when it offered because it could have set its IPO price higher than $ 17, potentially raising more money from investors.

TomboyX was leaving money on the table, and customers were unhappy because their orders couldn't be filled.

«I set up this company because I didn't want to see my nieces, who at the time were between 14 and 22, having the same conversations in their 40s about how much money they had left on the table that so many of my friends were having.»

Because Nate is extremely savings oriented, and goals like starting a family and retiring early are top priorities for us, it didn't make sense for him to leave any money on the table, even though I had a nice salary of my own.

«It always seems nuts because they are leaving perhaps matched contributions on the table, so free money... but we have to remember there are a lot of employees living pretty closely to the line, so finding some additional dollars to save for their retirement is pretty tough.»

They accept excessive risk in overvalued markets because they fear «leaving money on the table.»

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I believe he is bankrupt of ambition and ideas.He is going to leave when his contract expires but what legacy will he leave a mid table or even a championship club.How can Silent Stan be pleased if he loses money on every player because the manager thinks it is idea to let players leave for free.

Unless the wheels completely come off the franchise, a new deal for Bynum is almost assured because those that know him say he will not leave the money on the table to walk away and Philly has been given some level of assurance that Bynum is OK with what this new situation means for him.

That's money that the Syracuse athletic department leaves on the table annually because of an archaic agreement between the school and the air conditioning company.

Indeed, it appears that eHarmony excludes certain people from their dating pool, leaving money on the table in the process, presumably because the algorithm concludes that such individuals are poor relationship material.

Marvel was always going to make a Black Widow movie, eventually, because at a certain point it just becomes money left on the table.

Subaru already makes exceptionally well - engineered cars, and - yes - their sales are up, but they are leaving vast amounts of money on the table because their product lineup doesn't connect emotionally, the key component to driving people into showrooms.

Lexus figures it has been leaving money on the table for years because it lacked a three - row variant of the segment - leading RX crossover.

Because books physically degrade at different rates, and ebooks don't, publishers are sensitive to the ebook distribution terms, lest they leave money on the table in the long run.

You should either do what makes you content (allowing that you might be leaving money on the table, because you're pricing based on your own opinions rather than experimentation) or you should experiment to see what earns you the most money per month.

Because you left money on the table.

I do a couple of these things already, mostly out of habit (as some of you know, I was a professional blogger / content creator for my day job before I could make a living from my fiction, and I watched what a lot of the internet marketing gurus were doing, even if I never fully immersed myself in that world), and because it just makes sense not to leave money on the table.

I might sell as many books at $ 14.99 as I would at $ 9.99, because I might have motivated buyers, in which case Amazon would be forcing me to leave money on the table.

I'm willing to leave a little money on the table by avoiding rental properties because I simply have no desire — I repeat: no desire — to become a landlord.

Because if you have more than your emergency fund sitting in savings, you're leaving money on the table.

As I explained to him, one of the biggest problems was not that the points expired but that it was hard to use the remaining points effectively because Wells Fargo had a minimum redemption threshold: he had to redeem enough points for at least a ~ $ 400 ticket, meaning you left money on the table if you wanted anything cheaper.

He doesn't join loyalty programs because he doesn't see the value, but that's money left on the table.

I know for a fact that a number of banks are kicking the door down, because too much money is being left on the table that they can't capitalize on.»

1) Tenants who live in units charged with below market rents stay longer but do not report issues because they do not want you to realize that you're leaving money on the table.

As the seller is parading back and forth, wearing thin a path on the floor, waving fists in the air and building a case against closing the sale because the seller believes money was left on the table that should rightfully be in the seller's pocket, the buyers are freaking out as well.

As I mentioned previously, if you start with garbage in (inaccurate square footage data) then you will end up with garbage out (wrong value conclusion) and you will either sell your home for less than it is worth, and leave money on the table, or you will price it too high and it will taken longer to sell if you are able to sell it at all, because an asking price that is too high is the number one reason for homes not selling.

SELLERS: Don't leave money on the table by hiring an agent who takes shortcuts in marketing and exposure just because it's supposedly easy to sell in a «Seller's Market».