Sentences with phrase «leaving money on the table when»

Still, the massive price increase means that Mulesoft left money on the table when it offered because it could have set its IPO price higher than $ 17, potentially raising more money from investors.

That means you all are leaving money on the table when you could be backing potentially successful companies if only you understood their customers.

Mexico's LigaMX is the top football league in North America, and they are leaving money on the table when making their TV deals.

But new research suggests that people's racial biases make them more likely to leave money on the table when a windfall is not split evenly between groups.

And what pre-retirees don't know could cause them to leave money on the table when they do decide to claim Social Security benefits.

Are you leaving money on the table when it comes time to file your taxes?

At the same time, our mortality virtually guarantees that most people will leave some money on the table when they die.

Novy - Marx's basic message is that investors, in general but especially traditional value investors, leave money on the table when they ignore the quality dimension of value.

And don't leave money on the table when your retirement is staring you in the face.

Not exact matches

When it comes time to sell the most valuable asset you own why take a chance of leaving money on the table?

And when they go elsewhere, you're leaving money on the table.

In fact, when it comes to its very limited edition supercars like the LaFerrari, Ferrari's million dollar plus sale prices still leave a lot of money on the table for its elite cadre of customers who see the resale value of their cars rise to multiples of their purchase price.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I believe he is bankrupt of ambition and ideas.He is going to leave when his contract expires but what legacy will he leave a mid table or even a championship club.How can Silent Stan be pleased if he loses money on every player because the manager thinks it is idea to let players leave for free.

«When we asked him [Mallam Issa] he said he left the money on his wife's table... So every minute he would change the story... at one time he told me, Cudjoe Fianoo and the late Mr. Owusu Ansah that the money is in Ghana and there was no cause for alarm.http: / / ghanapoliticsonline.com

However, you may be leaving money on the table every month when you pay your utility bill.

Which is why so many people leave money on the table by not comparing rates, terms, and benefits when shopping for a card.

Even so, the average person commonly expresses the belief that when they have a profit going they should take the money and run - often leaving a lot of money on the table when they do.

Edgewonk shows you when you are leaving money on the table and you get actionable tips so that you can immediately make changes to improve the way you are trading.

Especially when you combine your analysis with the Trade Management function in Edgewonk you can easily find out if you potentially leave money on the table by managing your trades emotionally.

When I heard this, I couldn't believe how much money he must be leaving on the table paying for all of his flights in cash and not getting points or even cash back for his expenses.

It would seem to be a no - brainer for design professionals; many work solo and don't make a lot of money, and it is hard to make a good impression when your drawings stick to the jam left on the dining room table.

Secondarily, it strikes me that we're leaving a lot of money on the table when it comes to modernizing our plant.

It's popular these days to talk about «leaving money on the table,» but you're doing more than that when you ignore open enrollment.

Speaking of salary, as we were in that last post: It's annoying as hell to be asked to give your salary history when applying for a new job, and it's no secret that employers use that information to figure out what salary you're likely to accept from them — which puts candidates in an unfair position and raises obvious worries about leaving money on the table.