Opponents worry that vouchers will actually
leave public schools worse off by draining them of funds and encouraging the best students and the most involved parents to flee a failing school.
Not exact matches
In the teeth of the
worst recession in decades, more than one - third of the over 6,800 teachers hired in 2006 - 2007
left New York City
public schools of their own accord, largely because of the DOE's mismanagement and its obsession with test prep rather than real education.
All of my
public school teachers — the good, the
bad, and the easily forgettable — were fully credentialed and would have been deemed highly qualified under federal law had they lasted in the profession until the onset of No Child
Left Behind (NCLB).
Moreover, in the
public system, the ability of parents and students to ensure that they receive a high - quality education is constrained by the enormous obstacles to
leaving a
bad school.
And they're
schools that are open to students, which students can choose, but very often they're
worse than the
public school that they're
leaving.
We have spent so much time talking about what's wrong with our
schools, and fighting for alternatives to it, that we have understandably
left too many parents with the impression that we have given up on
public education — or even
worse, their kids.
The
worst fear of those of us who opposed the measure — that Question 2 would dismantle
public education, district by district, and
leave charter
schools free from accountability to the communities in which they reside — will not come to pass.
And yet, «results,» or rather, academic improvement, act more like a fig
leaf, especially in light of numerous recent studies that show charter
schools, taken on the whole, actually do a
worse job of educating students than regular
public schools.
It found that students who used vouchers did not see academic gains in their new
schools and that they performed
worse, on average, than their matched peers in the
public schools that they
left.
Most recipients are not
leaving the state's
worst schools: Just 3 percent of new recipients of vouchers in 2015 qualified for them because they lived in the boundaries of F - rated
public schools.
To make matters
worse, many charters cherry - pick their students,
leaving cash - strapped
public schools with higher populations of students with special or high needs, further tipping the scales.