None of those movements were
led by atheists, unbelievers or irreligious people.
Not sure what you mean by them being
led by atheists though.
A Godless world
lead by atheists, be curious - Please read and pass it on... http://www.drturi.com/atheists-christians-the-8-worst-places-in-the-world-to-be-non-religious/ Blessings DT
Not exact matches
The New
Atheists seem equally easily
led by Dawkins, Hitchens, and the like.
It is what has
lead me to my veiw that Atheism as a religion, the passion most
Atheist have for their point of view from the start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out on someone and start forcing their view on others, I see that as wrong also if someone asks or brings the debate to you then
by all means debate but why be rude how does it help?
I was complaints
by * theists * about
atheist billboards that
led to this policy that dictates what you can not do.
This
leads many people, appalled
by what happens in history, to become
atheists.
This papal - inspired project,
led by Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi aims to hold cultural meetings involving theists, agnostics and
atheists who share the common belief in and search for truth, justice and peace.
And the churches will find a way to separat the believers and
by default give us
atheists the upper hand as now we will face smaller groups
lead by small voices instead of one group with one voice... the battle shall be epic!
Richard Dawkins directly calls on
atheists to do such acts, with the idea that it'll
lead to more focus on things that can actually be controlled
by us, and resulting in a better life for everyone.
It is this kind of «hate - speech» which
led to the burning down of 77 churches in Norway
by militant
atheists and which at the most extreme end of the
atheist movement
leads to comments such as this from the Church Arson website «Any intelligent Antichrist methodology at that point will involve a consolidation of strength, public education in the ways of science and logic for our individual members, and actions taken against the remaining believers.
It also ignores the sheer chances brought up
by the Fermi Paradox, which would seem to point to us being special, or at least the process
leading to us begin different from the process that many
atheists believe
led to our existence.
Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation against Muslims and against their faith, this will only
lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain
by reacting and not
by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all of non religious such as
atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?
Led by a California
atheist who has tried to remove the phrase «under God» from the pledge of allegiance, a group of
atheists filed suit in federal court Tuesday (Dec. 30) to block prayers and mentions of God at President - elect Barack Obama's inauguration on Jan 20.
Lenin and Stalin's Socialist party was not an organized religion, in fact they were
atheists Mao's Communist party was not an organized relgion, in fact he was an
atheist Ethic cleansing in Armenia, the Balkins, and Africa was not
lead by an organized religion
Murray, who after remarrying took the name Madalyn Murray O'Hair, became the major figure held responsible (
by her opponents) for «taking God out of the schools» — an epithet she welcomed while
leading a controversial
atheist organization.
In fact, upon questioning what appeared to be a «miraculous» recovery from coma for a person that was actually pretty nasty, it was explained as «Satan trying to
lead us astray»... because of course if we stopped believing in God because Satan «fooled» us
by healing an
atheist, than Satan wins.
Hence we find the apologist Justin, for example, declaring» scarcely a century after Jesus» that «those who, before Christ,
led a life accompanied
by reason are Christians, even if they were known as
atheists.
However, in spring 2005, when Raymond Bradley, an
atheist in Editorial Board for The Open Society journal, wrote an open letter to Flew accusing him of not «check [ing] the veracity of [Schroeder's] claims before swallowing them whole,» Flew strongly responded to that charge in a letter published in the same journal in summer 2006, describing the content of Bradley's letter «extraordinary offensive» and the accusation made
by him as an «egregiously offensive charge»; he also implied that Bradley was a «secularist bigot,» and suggested that he should follow Socrates's advice (as scripted in Plato's Republic) of «follow [ing] the argument wherever it
leads.»
The Young
Atheist's Handbook was written
by science teacher Alom Shaha and tells the story of his upbringing in a Bangladeshi Muslim community in South East London, how he overcame his inner conflict surrounding his atheism, and the lessons he learnt in
leading a good life, full of awe and wonder, based on humanist principles.
It's a big shift from the typical attacks on
atheists and agnostics previously
led by reactionary or radical religious figures.
Newdow, a physician as well as a lawyer, is
lead plaintiff in a lawsuit filed in Washington, D.C., this week
by atheists and
atheist groups.