Not exact matches
In the late 19th century, under the deforming impact of dispensational pessimism and
liberal optimism, the broad river of
classical evangelicalism divided into a delta, with shallower streams emphasizing — ecumenism and social renewal on the
left and confessional orthodoxy and evangelism on the right.
Therefore, this convulsion will see the reconfiguration of the
classical left - right political axis into one composed of
liberal cosmopolitanism versus anti-
liberal populism.
«
Liberal» in USA has several meanings, mainly, either (1) «classical liberal» (which in USA is typically branded as «libertarianism» - although it's still called plain «liberalism» in Europe where the term originated); and, wholly independently, (2) «political liberal» - which is a self - made late 20th century [1] rebrand of what used to be called «progressive» (and can be loosely branded «left wing» at times, but personally I absolutely abhore single - axis left / right positioning) po
Liberal» in USA has several meanings, mainly, either (1) «
classical liberal» (which in USA is typically branded as «libertarianism» - although it's still called plain «liberalism» in Europe where the term originated); and, wholly independently, (2) «political liberal» - which is a self - made late 20th century [1] rebrand of what used to be called «progressive» (and can be loosely branded «left wing» at times, but personally I absolutely abhore single - axis left / right positioning) po
liberal» (which in USA is typically branded as «libertarianism» - although it's still called plain «liberalism» in Europe where the term originated); and, wholly independently, (2) «political
liberal» - which is a self - made late 20th century [1] rebrand of what used to be called «progressive» (and can be loosely branded «left wing» at times, but personally I absolutely abhore single - axis left / right positioning) po
liberal» - which is a self - made late 20th century [1] rebrand of what used to be called «progressive» (and can be loosely branded «
left wing» at times, but personally I absolutely abhore single - axis
left / right positioning) position.
[1]- Ironically, many true
liberals in
classical liberalism sense are currently trying to re-brand things back, by reclaiming «
liberal» label for their
left - libertarian positions (one of the most notable examples is Dave Rubin), while branding former - progressives - now - called - «
liberals» as «progressive» again, on the basis that current US progressive movement is claimed by many to be against many individual rights and the basis of
classical liberalism
Second, the whole point of
classical liberals is that low wage industrial employees are overall BETTER off under lassiez fair economy than
Left's favorite planned economy.
All contributions and communication are welcome, so long as they do not (within this project space) espouse, entertain, advocate for, or otherwise positively discuss the political ideals associated with Social Justice, Progressivism, Communism, Socialism, Fascism, Marxism, or anything else generally reminiscent of any political philosophy to the
left of
Classical Liberals or Libertarians.
Today's Democrats and Republicans political parties are not
left and right, but up and down, and are in fact both LEFT wing parties with modern «classical liberals» being in the middle; to the right of all left wing radicals (fascists, communists, and socialists) and to the left of the right wing anarchi
left and right, but up and down, and are in fact both
LEFT wing parties with modern «classical liberals» being in the middle; to the right of all left wing radicals (fascists, communists, and socialists) and to the left of the right wing anarchi
LEFT wing parties with modern «
classical liberals» being in the middle; to the right of all
left wing radicals (fascists, communists, and socialists) and to the left of the right wing anarchi
left wing radicals (fascists, communists, and socialists) and to the
left of the right wing anarchi
left of the right wing anarchists.
Thomas Malthus was not «
Left», he was a
classical liberal political economist.