Sentences with phrase «left exposed because»

Decisions are difficult to make, resources wasted, and systems and data left exposed because every day is tactical versus strategic.

The mini skirt underneath is genius, without it you could be left exposed because as the wind picks up so does the dress.

Not exact matches

This puts me in a more vulnerable position because 1) it exposes me to the criticisms of people on both sides of the debate, 2) it could lead to serious disappointment, should I find that my intellectual integrity and my faith are indeed incompatible, and 3) it leaves me in the awkward position of being uncertain, undecided, and maybe even a little confused for a while.

But according to Senator Gavin Marshall, chairman of the «Left federal parliamentary Labor Party caucus,» writing in The Age, Gillard's decision to allow a «conscience vote» on «gay marriage» is «not democratic,» because it «exposes individual parliamentarians to powerful conservative lobby groups» and the retrograde opinions of those «stubbornly opposed to all social reforms.»

At his birth a human being enters on the scene of life, draws a breath of air, beginning the process of living with a cry of pain, pays the tribute of a tear to Nature, just tastes life's sorrows before any sweets have been his, and before his joints have consolidated, tender as he is, he dies, perhaps because he was left exposed as a newborn child, or because he has suffocated, or because some illness has suddenly put a stop to his life.

Because avocados will oxidize over time if left exposed to the open air, try to serve this one as close to prep as possible, or add the avocado right before serving if making ahead.

I think the reason Monreal struggles this season is because Iwobi's inexperience leaves him exposed.

Song use to wonder forward and leave our def exposed and one of the reasons why he and Bould had the bust up was because Song wouldn't stay back.

We're going to waste time and money on a CB when we should be looking for a top class DM.If Wenger think signing another CB is solving our problems then he's lying to himself.Mark my words any other CB we sign no matter how good will still come and add to a shaky defense.The problem with our defenfing is more of tactical and mental.Tactical because we play without a DM, we mark and track players poorly, the fullbacks are usually isolated leaving them to cope alone, our passing is not good enough leaving us exposed to counters which we aren't prepared for and no leadership and maintenance of defensive shape.

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

Slowing the game down with back passes when we needed to speed it up, losing the ball for no reason and always leaving the back 4 exposed by running after the PSG midfielders when they had the ball because he was too for up the pitch.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

That was sensible any day because had he gone into the tackle resulting in Willian going past him it would have left the centre backs extremely exposed.

Arsene can not and will never be able to compete with top managers like Mourinho and Guardiola hence why he has never left this club for the likes of Real Madrid and PSG because he knows too well he would get exposed!!

Chelsea dictated the game by parking the bus, with so many men back it forces you to throw more men forward thus exposing your backbone, it happened against QPR, MAN U and will happen against us if we play all out attacking football why because with Arsenal we know when teams park the bus against us everyone comes forward including coq koscielny dubuchy / bellarin and monreal leaving metersacker to protect the fort, they create 1 - 1 situations where Hazard thrives.

Because if Ramsey plays CM, we know he is always going to bomb forward and leave Xhaka and the back line exposed.

It was either this or the guy was clueless because of the way he left his leg outstretched and exposed near the turf churning studs of opposition players.

It was evident that Arsenal missed Cazorla centrally against West Ham because the tempo was slow and struggled to control the midfield which left Coquelin exposed.

I am with you on that Pablo, in theory we should have 75 — 80 mill to spend, I wouldn't put Zabaletta in the 2 or 3 quality players, he is decent offensively but plays in a team that rarely has to defend, Moses looks decent doing that at Chelsea, all too often Byram has been exposed by not having any defensive assistance if we sign him will be interesting to see how he is defensively because he will be tested in our team, Batshuayi would be a quality addition but he is still only a reserve for Chelski and I don't think he could do what Costa has for them or for us, imo we would still need another striker to lead the line, maybe Josh King if the rumours are true, what hasn't been mentioned too much is the left wing slots, none of ours are particulary great most of them seem to prefer the right side, if we don't go for Nolito maybe have a punt on Grosicki from Hull, we were interested in him previously and he is a very quick player that can create and score goals.

It was more hassle and for me, less modest, because it was so fiddly and if it fell off or he removed it, I would be left feeling exposed.

It's so that the next time a woman is offered a c - section because her ignorant obstetrician is going on holidays and needs to get the baby out before he leaves, the woman can be empowered with the knowledge that because it is unnecessary and because vaginal birth will expose her baby to her own flora which is essential for her baby's health, then this unnecessary c - section is not the best thing for her child.

Layering them with a normal shirt gives me extra privacy because I can pull one up and the other down, leaving only my nipple exposed.

However, on the largest setting, you don't need to use all three snaps and because the sockets and not the studs of the snaps are exposed to your baby's hips, they shouldn't leave a mark.

But it warned that leaving the EU could increase the possibility of people moving between the UK and other EU member states (and vice versa) for work being exposed to the increased risk of having to pay double social security contributions because of the UK's «limited» and «uneven» bilateral social security treaties with other nations.

Unencumbered executive leaders worry about being lumbered with the blame for any failures of national security, because their autonomy leaves them exposed to carrying the can.

This amount of radiation is absolutely deadly to any one exposed for any length of time — You are dead within I hour with this level of exposure, This latest development has scuttled TEPCO's plans to decommission what's left of that exploded reactor because no one can be near enough to it to disassemble the wreckage.

A vaccine would be especially effective in people who have never been exposed to the disease before, or who lost their childhood immunity by leaving malaria - stricken areas, Lanar says, because these groups are more vulnerable to very severe forms of the illness than those who are partially immune.

Not only does your body become familiar with the same terrain, but it is left unchallenged, because you aren't exposing it to different inclines and surfaces.

I decided to try the products on the left side of my face, which had visibly aged faster than the right side perhaps because it has been exposed to more sunlight while driving.

If someone leaves the house feeling put together, and her rear end is not actively exposed, nor her «rear view» indecent because of, e.g., a skirt that is simply inappropriately short, why does it matter if her skirt rides up a bit in back?

A person's roots are not left behind simply because they are exposed to new customs.

You certainly don't want to leave this disc lying around outside the case, and not only because it can be easily scratched or otherwise damaged with one programming side always exposed.

I just took Mancode: Exposed free for two days, this past Sunday and Monday — mostly because I had a few days left and wanted to use them.

Indeed, many of the best decline more dramatically than their peers because the high conviction, high independence portfolios that are signs of their distinction also can leave them exposed when things turn bad.

But buying long - term rate locks is a little like buying insurance: You don't want to buy too much protection because that gets too costly and you don't want to buy too little coverage, either, because doing so can leave you exposed if calamity strikes.

Hi Kyle, Starting with just four peer loans is risky because it leaves you very exposed to each.

¹ Cash lets us protect perfectly against permanent loss risk and maintain certainty over being able to meet our short - term spending liabilities, however, because it loses purchasing power it leaves us exposed to this risk in the long - term.

Gone are the days of being forced to drag a banana behind you while in first place, and being in that weird limbo state where you can't collect anything else but don't want to drop said banana because you'll be left exposed.

Precisely because damage from very - low - level radiation can not be detected, people exposed to it are left in anguished uncertainty.

IMHO, Gleick went after Heartland not because he wanted to expose the institute to the general public but because he is a political animal that wanted to besmirch the reputation of HI in front of the loony green left.

I have recently unintentionally noticed that the UV radiation is killing the leafs of trees and plants the most exposed leaves to the sun are dying on many types of vegetation plus we have fires hazing the sky up which means more CO2 thanks to grindall61 (A YouTube channel) I hope I am spelling it correctly he goes to meetings in Southern California and records them we know that the state of California is because increasingly aggressive in reducing greenhouse gases even to the extremes of renting bikes and of course climate change is going to be used as an excuse to take away our rights don't fall for there wickedness but how can a serious state like California at least that's what I'm calling it here claim to want to fight climate change yet being ignorant on climate engineering this is a joke citizens stand up for your country.

(This behavior is, I think, associated with a relatively rapid cycling and equilibration between the atmophere and upper ocean, a slower equilibration with vegetation, and a slower equilibration with the deep ocean (and there's equilibration with exposed carbonates); equilibration with each successive C reservoir still leaves some of the atmospheric perturbation because the C is just being redistributed over a larger total reservoir (PS not necessarily maintaining the same equilibrium ratios, though I don't know about that much offhand).

Because you're more exposed to the elements, bicycle accidents can leave extensive injuries and expensive damage.

You should not be left to suffer because someone else failed to adhere to a normal standard of care and as a result, exposed you or a loved one to the risk of injury, illness, or death.

(That's because a third - party could use any of the big three to check your credit, so just freezing your Equifax file leaves you exposed.)

Could you potentially leave yourself financially exposed if you are sued because of a car accident?

Carrying the state - required minimums is never recommended, because they are often too low and will leave you exposed, especially if you are in a major accident.

Plan out your career and your family as much as possible, because letting both of those develop «naturally» can leave you financially exposed when the unexpected happens.

However, minimum coverage levels are not recommended because it can leave you financially exposed in an at - fault accident.

In the event that Scott were to quit, be fired or be laid off, his life insurance coverage would go away, leaving them completely exposed, and if 10 years had gone by, coverage would be much more expensive because Scott was now 10 years older.