Sentences with phrase «legacy publishers»
The phrase "legacy publishers" refers to traditional publishing companies that have been around for a long time and have established themselves in the industry. They are often contrasted with newer, digital-focused publishers. Full definition
This week's head - to - wall experience began by reading an article in one of our local papers about the trouble our libraries are having with legacy publishers over e-books.
madgeniusclub.com
Folks are more and more vocal about how it is past time for legacy publishers to break away from the traditional business plan, especially regarding royalties.
He's done some really good ones breaking down the figures paid by legacy publishers v. small presses or self - publishing.
Those same indie authors do, sometimes, get contracts from legacy publishers.
I'm tired of legacy publishers treating their authors like dirt, and worse.
Unless you're claiming that indie book covers, by their nature, do not show effort in their cover design, while legacy publishers do.
If legacy publishers want to keep up with the rapid pace, they'll need to be stay on top of new technologies and be as innovative as possible.
I brought up legacy publishers because they are the competition and they are who we have to keep an eye on.
Best sellers that legacy publishers who wouldn't look at them a day before now are falling all over themselves to sign.
Many legacy publishers only give authors money once or twice per year.
It's more of a talking point to say how legacy publishers are evil.
It's a ton of effort to build a readership, and at least through legacy publishers you have broader distribution.
Traditional publishers, especially legacy publishers, have to accept the fact they aren't the only game in town these days.
The old legacy publishers got mad, ended up in court lots and achieved next to nothing.
The reason legacy publishers have «gotten away» with as much as they have gotten (though hardly for much longer) is that the individual stakes are so small.
It's even harder to get an agent — something you need to get your foot in the door at most legacy publishers.
First of all, do any of us really see legacy publishers pricing their books under $ 5.99, much less as low as $ 2.99?
My point is this: legacy publishers still are not «getting» the e-book market.
The problem is that more and more legacy publishers are refusing to revert rights, using all sorts of imaginative accounting and contract interpretations to hold onto them.
I know legacy publishers and agents are scared about where the industry is going.
So that knocking you hear right now are the knees of legacy publishers trying to figure out what they're going to have to do to survive.
The indie presses grew up to replace the old, slow legacy publishers of that day.
Yes, legacy publishers provide various value - added services, such as editing, marketing, etc — at least some of the time.
Perhaps, considering the state of the industry and the terms legacy publishers are demanding from authors, the creators, it is time to call for a strike.
And legacy publishers seem to be the last in line to get on board with change.
Legacy publishers often view e-books as simply as another distribution channel for selling their print books.
It won't take much of a wind to blow legacy publishers over right now.
I believe readers will become less tolerant of the high prices legacy publishers put on their books.
Of course, that's something else legacy publishers hate.
Yet, legacy publishers continue to shoot themselves in the foot by doing their best to keep a major outlet for e-books tied up and out of the hands of readers.
The standard legacy publisher contract provides that the author gets 25 % of the net price of a digital book.
Why even within the relatively safe confines of the very blog post under discussion here do they not call out even a single legacy publisher by name?
Even though it's so obvious it seems silly to say it, my experience with legacy publishers isn't representative of every other author's experience.
Now's the time for legacy publishers to embrace the change presented to the publishing industry and become innovative, investing in ebooks and finding new ways to be digitally disruptive.
Frankly, I see a lot more «good» writing and editing coming out of indie and small press books right now than I do the stuff coming from legacy publishers.
If legacy publishers are to survive, they are going to have to take steps now.
There should be a marginal discount to reflect that over the cost of the paperback — instead many legacy publishers are charging more.
The video highlights the fact that cloud services promise the latest technologies without a large upfront investment and can help streamline capabilities of legacy publishers.
Most legacy publishers have failed to recognize, much less embrace, changes in technology or demand of the buying public.
Legacy publishers like Lonely Planet and Rough Guides often have PDF versions of their guidebooks, often by chapter, which can be a more cost effective way of buying your research material — and they weigh nothing.
You blog plus one from Hugh Howey and a few others has inspired me to write one of my own about what legacy publishers should have learned from iTunes.