Sentences with phrase «legal argument in your case»

«We know that we have the stronger legal arguments in this case and that California courts have interpreted state law correctly, including within the parameters of takings analysis,» says Angela Howe, Legal Director for the Surfrider Foundation.

The results of this investigation will be crucial in creating a persuasive legal argument in your case.

Not exact matches

The suits are part of a group of at least four other cases with similar arguments in various courts around the country, and they make legal experts wary, particularly as the differences in opinion seem to indicate their destiny to go before the Supreme Court.

Catholic organizations have for decades fought to change federal and state laws that fail to protect «unborn persons,» and Catholic Health's lawyers in this case had the chance to set precedent bolstering anti-abortion legal arguments.

For information regarding some of the legal battles and arguments, see «Case Studies,» in The Ethics of Reproductive Technology.

One of the strongest arguments in recent years for abolishing the death penalty has arisen, not from the moral prohibition against the taking of life, but from the fact that with rare exceptions those who are executed are people who lack the means to secure good legal assistance, or lack the educational background to make full use of such assistance, or lack the social status which brings the case to public attention.11

No one with the least comprehension of legal reasoning who has followed the actual jurisprudential arguments in the relevant cases could have written such lines.

Next Monday, March 24 — the day before oral arguments in the Hobby Lobby andConestoga Wood Products cases — the Religious Freedom Project at Georgetown University's Berkley Center will host an event, «Everybody's Business: The Legal, Economic, and Political Implications of....

Ian Brownlie and Tom Franck made such arguments (though Anthea Roberts has written an essay disagreeing) It may be argued that providing advance legal authorization is more likely to encourage such action whereas what we want is to be very restrictive with regard to permissible uses of force but that in cases of genuine need the international community will excuse and not condemn action.

On the other hand, the fact that the case is already so far in the public domain might be evidence that arguments used by m» learned friends to try and stuff it back into the obscurity from which it sprang are little more than legal tosh and nonsense.

After the 2nd Circuit ruled last week, the three - judge panel hearing the appeal in the Skelos case asked lawyers to submit additional legal arguments in light of the Silver decision.

Deondra Brown said arguments that opening a one - year window to revive old cases would cause a flood of legal cases has not been borne out in other states.

Even if they find a way around the arguments for a legal obligation, there is a strong ethical case which they would be advised not to spurn - particularly as the cameraman hired, Danny Dewsbury, is a student in substantial debt.

The report also notes the increasing numbers of cases where people in important roles deploy the «conscientious objection» legal argument to excuse themselves from doing things they really should.

Last week, the petitioners, which also include the Legal Aid Society, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the New York Civil Liberties Union, submitted a motion for preference to the appellate court, asking that arguments in the case be heard by the end of June.

The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday will hear oral arguments in the case of Shew vs. Malloy, a legal challenge to the key provisions of Connecticut's post-Newtown gun control legislation.

Without indicating what action he might take in the Ivy case, Soares insisted he was working to prevent a defense attorney from raising a potentially disastrous legal argument against any district attorney who might bring charges in a case that falls into what Soares characterized as the executive order's ample ambiguities.

As the public corruption trial of State Assemblyman Sheldon Silver heads to closing arguments on Monday, the clash in the courtroom has been handled largely by well - staffed government and defense legal teams, each with a wealth of experience in handling corruption cases.

Treatment in extreme cases of the illness requires the cooperation of patients, and as such one of the arguments of those who oppose compulsory hospitalization of patients with anorexia nervosa is that beyond the legal question of a person's freedom of choice, involuntary hospitalization is an ineffective tool that will not improve the health conditions of patients.

The 80 minutes of occasionally spirited argument at the high court this morning focused on the two main issues in the greenhouse gas litigation: For the case to go forward, the plaintiffs must prove that the case has legal standing (they must show that the court is the right venue for resolving this dispute), and that the common law definition of nuisance can support suits over greenhouse gases.

Legal experts note that judges» opinions in environmental cases won't necessarily fall strictly along ideological lines, but that conservative judges are often more likely to reject arguments calling for more regulation or trying to fit climate change rules within the existing Clean Air Act.

Berg's film doesn't go that deeply into the sociology of the case, which means it misses how a bunch of smart legal minds could be so arrogant to railroad three teenagers and then dismiss all arguments in favor of their innocence.

WASHINGTON — A new audiotape collection of oral arguments in 23 landmark cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, promoted as a teaching tool for schools, is selling briskly despite the threat of legal action from the Justices.

Responding to a hypothetical question posed by Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Julius L. Chambers of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund conceded that if his argument won the day, orders in such cases could conceivably remain in force for 100 years or more if the effects of segregation persisted that long.

He represented districts attempting to reform Michigan's school finance as early as the late 1960's, and his work inspired legal arguments used in equity cases elsewhere in the nation...

These serve as the foundation for understanding more complex topics, such as the elements of argument and the chain of legal reasoning used in court cases and historical documents.Advanced Composition and Rhetoric Honors also includes honors enrichment activities.

In addition to the expert opinion, legal arguments pertaining to mootness and ripeness, as well as a strong defense of CCJEF's legitimate standing in the case, the reply brief was offered by counsel for the plaintiffs, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (New York), with assistance from the Yale Law School Education Adequacy Clinic, both of which serve pro bono in this actioIn addition to the expert opinion, legal arguments pertaining to mootness and ripeness, as well as a strong defense of CCJEF's legitimate standing in the case, the reply brief was offered by counsel for the plaintiffs, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (New York), with assistance from the Yale Law School Education Adequacy Clinic, both of which serve pro bono in this actioin the case, the reply brief was offered by counsel for the plaintiffs, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (New York), with assistance from the Yale Law School Education Adequacy Clinic, both of which serve pro bono in this actioin this action.

Another punch has been thrown in the Silicon Knights vs Epic Games litigation, with Epic now saying case features many «legal deficiencies» and that many of SK's arguments are meaningless.

On Tuesday a federal court in Washington D.C. heard oral arguments on a historic case — a legal challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's science - based determination that heat - trapping greenhouse gas pollution is a threat to our health and well - being.

I had the opportunity to solidify my legal and non-legal research and writing skills while working on challenging, and in some cases unprecedented, arguments at the local, state, national, and international level.

On September 27, 2016, the entire United States District Court for the District of Columbia will hear oral arguments in West Virginia, et al. v EPA, to which E&E Legal is party, challenging the EPA's «Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units» rule under section 111 (d) of the Clean Air Act, over the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) regulation that will cripple, and in many cases, shut down coal - fired power plants.

A recent decision of the Human Rights Tribunal considered a similar argument, although one with dramatically less severe legal consequences, in a case involving the Regional Municipality of Waterloo.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinioCases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opiniocases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

18 Unlike the extracurricular interscholastic competitions that bear the same name today, the moot courts of this period were mandatory exercises in the law school curriculum, modeled after the «moots» of the Inns of Courts in England.19 The law school professors of the day gave the students a fictitious case and assisted the students in drafting the pleadings and other documents, preparing the arguments, and then arguing the case.20 In theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinin the law school curriculum, modeled after the «moots» of the Inns of Courts in England.19 The law school professors of the day gave the students a fictitious case and assisted the students in drafting the pleadings and other documents, preparing the arguments, and then arguing the case.20 In theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinin England.19 The law school professors of the day gave the students a fictitious case and assisted the students in drafting the pleadings and other documents, preparing the arguments, and then arguing the case.20 In theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinin drafting the pleadings and other documents, preparing the arguments, and then arguing the case.20 In theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinIn theory, if not always in practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writinin practice, these were the forerunners of today's legal writing classes that emphasize persuasive writing.

Additionally, the SJC rejected Otis» arguments that judicial estoppel should not be applied because: (1) Otis is bringing the present suit as an assignee of Cusick and is therefore presenting Cusick's claims, not his own; (2) Otis himself did not make inconsistent statement under oath concerning his comparative negligence; and (3) the SJC previously rejected use of judicial estoppel in cases of assignment of legal malpractice claims.

A special thank you goes to Marlo Greer who worked with Steve Shapiro on this case through settlement of the wrongful death claim, and to Amanda Pfeil who handled legal arguments, motions and jury instructions, to Amy Rogers who spent hundreds of hours on deposition summaries and motions and to Melissa Winthers who kept our firm afloat and well managed in the absence of all of its other lawyers!

[He] was always available; friendly and supportive; intensely interested in the case; available to prepare numerous quality legal memoranda which were well written, well reasoned, and well documented; creative but relevant in his approach and recommendations in dealing with very difficult issues; very timely with responses to my requests; able to prepare me for trial on all issues; and able to provide me with thorough, accurate, and winning case law and convincing legal arguments.»

Professor White suggests that it does matter how opinions are written because they have important consequences for the parties in a particular case and for the future.29 He further argues that a crucial part of legal activity is the criticism of opinions on rational, political, and moral grounds because that is how relevant arguments are made in support of changing or retaining current rules of law.30 For him, the bigger question «is whether law will move in the direction of trivializing human experience, and itself, or in the direction of dignifying itself and that experience.»

Just as chess players marshall their 16 chess pieces in a battle of wits, attorneys must select from millions of cases in order to present the best legal arguments.

The importer appealed to the Supreme Court, which held that in copyright cases the «objective reasonableness» of the losing party's legal position carries «substantial weight» in deciding whether to grant attorneys» fees to the winning party — but that factor alone is not dispositive: a party's litigation misconduct or «repeated» infringement or «overaggressive» enforcement of claims could also justify a fee award even if a party's legal argument was reasonable.

For example, I've seen several instances in which lawyers base legal arguments primarily on recent case law located from electronic databases or from judicial consideration of current statute only, without reference to earlier versions of the same provisions.

I find it rather remarkable if not ignorant that you speak so easily about a judgment devoid of any logical, economic or even legal arguments, which stretches the scope of Article 101 to operators which could not possibly have foreseen this; in any case not on the basis of the Treaty text, not on the basis of any precedent, and hardly on the basis of competition law doctrine.

They genuinely like this activity that had the potential to give them fresh ideas or help them stumble on new cases that end up providing the key argument in the case and most of their time spent doing that was absolutely undistinguishable (as far as trying to segregate it in distinct time entries at least) from the time spent doing legal reasoning.

Will the reasoning in this case change the way you do research to support your legal opinions and arguments?

The «explosion in the number of cases being made available online», combined with the comparative ease with which one can find a judgment with exact or similar facts from the same province, undermines or weakens the use of legal arguments on principle.

However, tendering a written argument at the hearing is neither an alternative to, nor a substitute for, setting out the «Legal Basis» in a notice of application or an application response in accordance with what the Rules and the case law require.

At a highly emotional and stressful time, when your children, home, property, and future income may be on the line, you should not have to argue your own case in court, prepare your own legal arguments, or settle your matter without legal advice.

At this point in time, we will determine the best legal argument for your case.

West Coast LEAF and the Community Legal Assistance Society (CLAS) were jointly granted leave to intervene in Denton v British Columbia, a case that addresses whether a claimant who was denied workers compensation benefits is barred from challenging that denial on equality grounds under the Charter because she did not raise the argument at an earlier stage of her case.

The Court, secondly, and in line with settled case - law, refuted the argument that the request was inadmissible because the EU itself was not a party to the Convention, because the request was made to clarify the competence of the EU, not the legal obstacles the EU may face in concluding international agreements (this can be done through the Member States, paras 43 - 44).