Rhetoric was out of favor in American legal education during the nineteenth century, as law schools adopted a truth - seeking «scientific» approach to teaching law that cared not for how
a legal argument was presented, only for the truth of its contentions.
Not exact matches
«Any
argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of
legal challenges
presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries
been deemed more dangerous than others?»»
Philosophical, educational, and
legal arguments for and against greater inclusion
are also
presented.
Mill's «Subjection of Women»
is an essay favouring equality of the sexes, written in 1869 in coordination with his wife Harriet Taylor, the essay
presents arguments opposing the social and
legal inequalities of that time... In some cultures, such still exists...
While she notes that the «purpose of the revision of the former fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC by the
present fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU
was undoubtedly to strengthen individual
legal protection by extending the
legal remedies available to natural and
legal persons against European Union acts of general application» (para. 33), she nevertheless continues by making three
arguments which underline the General Court's interpretation of what regulatory acts entail.
Additionally, the SJC rejected Otis»
arguments that judicial estoppel should not
be applied because: (1) Otis
is bringing the
present suit as an assignee of Cusick and
is therefore
presenting Cusick's claims, not his own; (2) Otis himself did not make inconsistent statement under oath concerning his comparative negligence; and (3) the SJC previously rejected use of judicial estoppel in cases of assignment of
legal malpractice claims.
Factual submissions
are made in opening statements and
legal submissions
are presented in closing
argument.
We
are extremely proud this year to
be presenting our Great Friend of Justice award to Mary L. Bonauto, the civil rights lawyer whose powerful
arguments and long - term
legal strategies have led to historic strides in achieving marriage equality for same - sex couples across the United States.
Effective WTO advocacy requires, in addition to a comprehensive knowledge of WTO law, an understanding of the multilateral institutional context in which WTO dispute settlement occurs, the ability to devise effective strategies within a system that does not allow for monetary or retrospective remedies, and the capacity to
present arguments in a manner which WTO adjudicators (who
are drawn from a wide variety of professional backgrounds and
legal cultures) will find convincing.
We
are extremely proud this year to
be presenting our Great Friend of Justice award to Mary L. Bonauto, the civil rights lawyer whose powerful
arguments and long - term
legal strategies have led to historic strides in -LSB-...]
I will fully and fairly analyze the
legal arguments that
are presented.
Suppose that, in this case, the plaintiff
was an SRL, but yet, he
was able to
present a
legal argument.
Sadly, it
is not uncommon for self - represented parties to lose a case merely because they did not understand the law or failed to
present a coherent
legal argument despite having very compelling facts in their favour.
But whenever it seems likely that the child's views and interests may not
be properly
presented to the court, and in particular where there
are legal arguments which the adult parties
are not putting forward, then the child should
be separately represented.»
Arguments must
be based upon the evidence
presented to the court and any relevant
legal point you wish the court to consider.
This
legal process will not allow the discovery of net worth information if there
is no court approval, which would require a formal process complete with an initial motion or petition, a notice sent to the targeted party, and a courtroom hearing that would allow either party to
present arguments in their favor.
In exemplary fashion, Mr. Tonkovich untangled a confusing body of evidence and
argument, discerned the most important
legal issues, and effectively
presented submissions that
were of significant assistance to the Court in the efficient resolution of this case.
When they
are collaborating with colleagues to assess a
legal matter, negotiating with adversaries, developing case strategies, building
arguments, and
presenting a persuasive case, attorneys
are leveraging uniquely human skills.
But almost uniformly, judges want to hear what
's right or wrong about the
legal issues, the
argument, and the facts
presented, not about what the attorney thinks of opposing counsel
's practice or the bad things opposing counsel has done.
Carvin
is correct, however, that his best chance of winning this case
is to hope that the justices will place their partisan preferences before the law, as the
legal arguments presented in his briefs
are weak.
Further, it may
be that with assistance, we, lawyers, may
be able to use
AI software to improve the
legal arguments we make and the way we
present evidence in court or the drafting of a
legal document in court.
5.1.4 The appendix should contain only such material as
is necessary for understanding the
legal issues and the
argument to
be presented to the Supreme Court (see rule 22 (2)-RRB-.
We can work with your trial team to conduct a focus group and help you determine which litigation strategies
are effective in propelling your
legal arguments and which need more work before they can
be presented to a jury effectively.
Sadly, I can easily think of times I have heard a professional or academic (
legal and other)
present an
argument without acknowledging they
were making an
argument rather than stating fact / law.
Our lawyers
are well versed in cross-examining witnesses and
presenting solid
legal arguments before the court and members of the jury.
Although there
were some interesting
legal arguments presented that I've omitted for the sake of brevity, the decision should
be an interesting one, especially if they expound or decide on any of the positions taken by the parties.
He
's developing his own
legal analytics platform called Econo.Mine which
is intended to «improve the drafting of expert testimonies and judicial education in economics so that judges can make better use of the
arguments presented to them when deciding cases.»
Having thoroughly discussed every point raised by the CIBC — including several minor
arguments not summarized here — Justice Khullar concluded that, even though the Tenancy Dispute Officer did not have the benefit of any of the
legal arguments or authorities
presented by the CIBC to her, the Tenancy Dispute Officer's decision
was both reasonable and, if it needed to
be, correct (at para 49).
Justice Khullar notes (at para 48) that the Tenancy Dispute Officer did not have the benefit of the
legal argument and case law that
was presented to her, but instead interpreted the legislation «from first principles».
But please note, this
is not the time to
present testimony, just
legal arguments.
A litigated divorce
is an adversarial process, with each party represented by
legal counsel and
presenting their strongest
arguments to the judge.
Even though the husband could confer with his attorney outside of the mediation process, the mediation would
be more productive, if he
were to have the attorney
present for the sessions regarding support, as well as distribution of assets, to provide
legal advice, and for the other side's attorney to hear his attorney's
argument.