Sentences with phrase «legal argumentation»

TAGS: Legal informatics projects; Legal argument; Legal argumentation; Legal reasoning; Legal knowledge representation; Automatic subject indexing of legal documents; Automatic subject classification of legal documents; Automatic indexing of legal documents; Automatic classification of legal documents; Automatic subject indexing of legal arguments; Automatic subject classification of legal arguments; Automatic indexing of legal arguments; Automatic classification of legal arguments; Legal subject headings; Legal subject indexing; Legal thesauri; Legal ontologies.

TAGS: Burden of proof; Criminal law information systems; Criminal procedure information systems; Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible reasoning in law; Evidence and legal reasoning; Evidence information systems; Evidentiary decisionmaking; Evidentiary decisions; Evidentiary reasoning; Gender and evidentiary reasoning; Gender and legal reasoning; Inference and legal evidence; Inference in law; Inference in legal information systems; Inference in legal reasoning; Legal argument; Legal argumentation; Legal decisionmaking; Legal defeasible reasoning; Legal evidence; Legal evidence information systems; Legal inference; Legal logic; Legal reasoning in the process of proof; Legal statistical evidence; Modeling burdens of proof; Narrative based legal reasoning; Narrative in legal evidence; Process of proof in law; Schemes in legal narrative analysis; Statistical evidence in law; Legal informatics monographs; Legal informatics article collections.

TAGS: Legal informatics conferences; Legal argumentation systems; Legal argument systems; Legal rhetoric; Legal reasoning; Artifical intelligence and law conferences; Defeasible reasoning.

TAGS: Legal informatics conferences; Legal argumentation systems; Legal argument systems; Legal rhetoric; Legal negotiation systems; Negotiation systems; Legal multi agent systems; Legal agent based systems; Artifical intelligence and law conferences.

CREATOR: NaLELA: Workshop on Natural Language Engineering of Legal Argumentation.

Earlier planned litigation strategies (such as campaigns for school desegregation and for the abolition of capital punishment) took place primarily within the court system, employing legal argumentation as the mechanism for social change.

Not exact matches

But that rationale is, at best, incomplete, and leaves open a different line of argumentation, one that applies even within competitive domains, and one that should truly drive a stake through the heart of the «legal = ethical» nonsense.

«Let's take emotion out of it and just talk about it — I mean, the legal system is full of argumentation.

Joshua Rozenberg meets computer scientists at the University of Liverpool, who are using «computational argumentation'to digitally decide the results of legal cases, proving that AI can be just as discerning as a court judge.

As a former University Professor of Argumentation, Mark describes himself as «an overeducated legal consultant.»

Unfortunately, just like the CJEU in the Pringle ruling, the AG can be accused of legal formalism in his argumentation.

The above arguments are based upon the constitutional law doctrine of «structural argumentation» (see: Robin M. Elliott, «References, Structural Argumentation and the Organizing Principles of Canada's Constitution» (2000), 80 Canadian Bar Review 67, and decisions such as the, Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 721, [1985] S.C.J. No. 36, the, Reference Re Secession of Québec, [1999] S.C.J. No. 4, [1998] 2 SCR 217, and the, Reference re Remuneration of Judges, [1997] S.C.J. No. 75, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 3, to argue that the need for access to the rule of law, and to constitutional rights and freedoms, dictate that law societies in Canada can not enforce a monopoly over the provision of legal services that enables their members to charge fees of whatever size argumentation» (see: Robin M. Elliott, «References, Structural Argumentation and the Organizing Principles of Canada's Constitution» (2000), 80 Canadian Bar Review 67, and decisions such as the, Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 721, [1985] S.C.J. No. 36, the, Reference Re Secession of Québec, [1999] S.C.J. No. 4, [1998] 2 SCR 217, and the, Reference re Remuneration of Judges, [1997] S.C.J. No. 75, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 3, to argue that the need for access to the rule of law, and to constitutional rights and freedoms, dictate that law societies in Canada can not enforce a monopoly over the provision of legal services that enables their members to charge fees of whatever size Argumentation and the Organizing Principles of Canada's Constitution» (2000), 80 Canadian Bar Review 67, and decisions such as the, Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 721, [1985] S.C.J. No. 36, the, Reference Re Secession of Québec, [1999] S.C.J. No. 4, [1998] 2 SCR 217, and the, Reference re Remuneration of Judges, [1997] S.C.J. No. 75, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 3, to argue that the need for access to the rule of law, and to constitutional rights and freedoms, dictate that law societies in Canada can not enforce a monopoly over the provision of legal services that enables their members to charge fees of whatever size they see fit.

TAGS: Deontic logic; Nonmonotonic reasoning; Defeasible reasoning; Argumentation systems; Argument systems; Legal informatics conferences; Legal reasoning conferences; Logic conferences; Law and linguistics; Linguistics; Legal informatics; Legal informatics blogs; Semantic Web and law; Legal ontologies; Legal knowledge representation.

TAGS: Deontic logic; Nonmonotonic reasoning; Defeasible reasoning; Argumentation systems; Argument systems; Legal informatics conferences; Legal reasoning conferences; Logic conferences.

Students will also have the opportunity to further refine their skills in public speaking and oral argumentation, and to renew their abilities in legal research and writing.

English is also a great major for a future legal career, because it helps you develop your writing and argumentation skills.