They show how companies affected by the rule are encouraging entrenched opponents of EPA to make backup plans to comply in case legal attacks don't succeed.
Not exact matches
To
do such which results in a man having in one case years of
legal procedure and suffer panic
attacks is deplorable.
I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to
do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was
attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take
legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»
And people who
do stupid things like openly
attacking other people's beliefs like that guy... well, sometimes you get what you deserve... sometimes there is a distinction between what's
legal and what's smart...
I sure as heck
do NOT want religious people to
attack the laws allowing abortion to remain
legal.
And people who are builing the center had nothing to
do with the
attacks, they even have nothing to be forgiven for, just exercising their
legal rights.
So again, if you feel comfortable nodding yes to these marketing considerations, maybe
do the research to understand the
legal concerns specific to you or your proposed
attack.
In such an event, which countries have the
legal right to
attack North Korea and which ones don't and would they occupy the region with a forceful regime change?
But the existence of a plethora of such articles
does not grant Trump any
legal way to
attack «Offending Press Outlets» as organisations as a whole.
At the Democratic Party's lunchtime meeting in Tarrytown, Schumer spoke to his hopes for the future, including that he will become Senate majority leader and, in the event the Republican - controlled Senate
does not relent in its opposition to an Obama nominee, «our madam president will surely nominate a person for the Supreme Court who is in the
legal mainstream (and) will uphold fundamental rights and common sense precedents now so severely under
attack by the right - wing.»
Money for low - income housing in New York City, help for unions under
legal attack, funding for the infamous, murky water - discharging Niagara Falls wastewater plant:
done,
done and
done.
In the absence of full - time virtual schools, teachers unions and other opponents use their resources to
attack blended - learning charters, even though the latter
do not differ in
legal structure, brick - and - mortar presence, or enrollment practices from other charter schools.
• What impact
did the
legal attack have on the status and position of Jews living in Germany?
Yet that
did not inoculate it against a
legal attack.
Educate them if they're new, actually ask them what their practices are (I find a lot of people automatically label people as a BYB just for having the gall to breed any dog at all, it doesn't matter what the persons standards were — BYB is just a negative slang term intended to
attack / offend any given breeder — it actually doesn't mean anything in a
legal sense, there is no
legal definition of it because there is no way of defining it in a
legal manner without also applying it to all breeders).
As a result of his confrontation with Monckton, Mandia wanted to
do something to defend other scientists against similar
attacks, and help them understand their
legal rights and responsibilities.
I don't think that # 217 was an
attack on Mr. Lindgren because he was a law professor, I think it was about how different the political and
legal processes are different from the scientific process.
The Ontario
legal regulator has
done absurd things over the years, but the most egregious is to
attack Joe Groia and make him the poster child of a civility campaign.
But during his confirmation hearings, he said he had dropped the death penalty in an Alabama case when he learned it
did not meet the
legal criteria, weathering political
attacks for the decision.
«Please don't think this won't happen to you»: The lessons learned from DLA's cyber
attack To a packed room in which you could literally have heard a pin drop, on 26 February at
Legal Leaders IT Forum in Gleneagles Daniel Pollick, outgoing CIO at DLA Piper, described for the first time in an open forum the circumstances surrounding the global «not - Petya» cyber incident that DLA was embroiled in on 27 June 2017 and the lessons that can be learned in its aftermath.
Here's a thought: rather than «
attack ads», why doesn't Dentons use that time and energy to act as a business accelerator for a new type of law firm financial survey that it believes is better suited to the modern globalized
legal market?
legal problems they don't know that they have, e.g., one unserviced
legal problem often leads to several more — e.g., termination of employment without cause or compensation, means debt, loss of property, family break - up, depression, substance abuse, and sometimes suicide, etc.; and, (3) enlist the help of the social media, news media, pressure groups, and those political parties in opposition to governments; (4) everyone should complain loudly to all of the above about law societies» failure to try to solve the unaffordable
legal services problem — their failure to
attack it is the cause.
But Liz Cheney and her Keep America Safe organization have managed to
do it with their McCarthy - like
attacks on U.S. Justice Department lawyers, smearing and demonizing them as terrorist sympathizers for their previous
legal work defending Gitmo detainees.
Contributory negligence means that if the victim contributed to the dog
attack in any way, usually including agitating the dog or attempting to pet a hostile dog, then the victim
does not have any
legal right to attempt to claim compensation.
In other words, some states operate on a strict liability clause that places
legal responsibility on the owner — even if (s) he
did nothing wrong regarding their obligation to protect others from an
attack.
«[I] t's an information site, and we've been very careful to make it that focus, so we're not
attacking the law society, we're not
attacking individuals, you won't see any satire, you'll see an approach that we want information out there to the
legal community because we don't think... we were given the whole context in which this EDI initiative arose and what the consequences are.»
With the global ransomware
attacks, what
do you think could change on the
legal spectrum, to help tackle such
attacks?
Yes, said Floyd Abrams, who was part of the
legal team defending the Times in the Pentagon Papers case... Judges need to «explain ourselves, not just orally in court, but in written opinions,» said Judge Paul Friedman of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. Friedman was speaking at a panel on «judges under fire» and what should be
done when judges are
attacked for rendering unpopular opinions.
In the same post, Albert
attacked BCG Attorney Search's sister companies by writing disparaging comments about
Legal Authority and LawCrossing, warning readers, «Just don't believe a SINGLE THING you read on [Law Crossing's] website.»
Though it
did acknowledge that
legal troubles and continuous DDoS
attacks had also played a role in this decision.
He predicted that without a
legal prohibition these weapons could create instability and warned: «Soon, you may see swarms of robots
attacking a country... The robots can be easily deployed, they don't get tired, they don't get bored.»
Laws Against DDoS
Attacks «I find it hard to believe Sony would be doing this, given the legal implications of mounting DDoS attacks» Incapsula CEO Marc Gaffan told the E-Commerce
Attacks «I find it hard to believe Sony would be
doing this, given the
legal implications of mounting DDoS
attacks» Incapsula CEO Marc Gaffan told the E-Commerce
attacks» Incapsula CEO Marc Gaffan told the E-Commerce Times.
Although that may still be far away, AI has already managed to
do some amazing things, such as spotting cancer in tissue slides better than humans, anticipate fraudulent payment
attacks before they occur, trade stocks, and even flag errors in
legal documents.
With this information, his attorney could have
attacked the
legal filing with counterclaims, moved to dismiss it entirely, or at least (if he couldn't afford or didn't want to hire an attorney), guide him in the right direction and tell him what to request at mediation (which is compulsory in the state where he got divorced).
Their
attacks are baseless, and clearly about one thing — ending safe and
legal abortion in America (the congressional hearing a couple of weeks ago helped make clear this is all part of a political agenda, as
did the announcement of a special committee to investigate Planned Parenthood).
Gov. Greitens was in Springfield on Tuesday to talk taxes and a group of concerned Missourians didn't want him to get out of town without hearing what they think about his egregious
attacks on sexual and reproductive health, especially access to safe and
legal abortion.