Sentences with phrase «legal citation standard»

Canada's pathbreaking vendor - neutral legal citation standard, and CanLII's innovative RefLex citator, are the topics of Ivan Mokanov's new post, entitled Environmentally - Friendly Citations, on the VoxPopuLII blog, published by the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School.

TAGS: Legal informatics databases; Legal citation; Legal citation standards; Legal metadata; Legal descriptive metadata; Legal metadata standards; Legal metadata content standards; Legal descriptive metadata content standards.

TAGS: Legal citation; Legal citation standards; Legal metadata; Legal descriptive metadata; Legal metadata standards; Legal metadata content standards; Legal descriptive metadata content standards.

Is it possible to co-ordinate uniform legal citation standards with our British and Australian colleagues?

Not exact matches

Not only are the software packages not able to address the nuances of legal materials, but there are types of legal materials, such as looseleafs, which were not considered by the developers of the standards for data format and citation type.

Robin Cover, Director of Information Services at OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards), has released version 2 of his annotated bibliography on standards for legal citation.

Saskatchewan has never had a single or standard set of rules for legal citations.

Why would Carswell / Thomson / McGill want to make the McGill guide free when the BCCA has recently mandated that the 7th ed will be the standard for citation of legal material?

The Canadian public has a right to an accessible standard of legal citation that will facilitate, not hinder their... [more]

It provides a block quote in standard legal - citation form from the Supreme Court's opinion that is both citation - heavy and more stylistically vivid than the lawyer's own writing in this descriptive post:

This is true in many other areas of specialized knowledge, but citation standards in the legal realm seem to be particularly cluttered with minute details and exceptions, especially in Canada and the United States.

Why is it, then, that citation systems for law — whether the Harvard Bluebook, the Chicago Maroon Book, the Canadian McGill Guide, the British OSCOLA: Oxford University Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities or the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (AGLC)-- are so idiosyncratic and radically different from these other citation systems, offering a system of citation that bears little relation to these others, at once more complex and detailed while less comprehensive icitation systems for law — whether the Harvard Bluebook, the Chicago Maroon Book, the Canadian McGill Guide, the British OSCOLA: Oxford University Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities or the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (AGLC)-- are so idiosyncratic and radically different from these other citation systems, offering a system of citation that bears little relation to these others, at once more complex and detailed while less comprehensive iCitation of Legal Authorities or the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (AGLC)-- are so idiosyncratic and radically different from these other citation systems, offering a system of citation that bears little relation to these others, at once more complex and detailed while less comprehensive iCitation (AGLC)-- are so idiosyncratic and radically different from these other citation systems, offering a system of citation that bears little relation to these others, at once more complex and detailed while less comprehensive icitation systems, offering a system of citation that bears little relation to these others, at once more complex and detailed while less comprehensive icitation that bears little relation to these others, at once more complex and detailed while less comprehensive in scope?

The standard methods for American legal citation are defined by two competing rulebooks: the ALWD Citation Manual: A Professional System of Citation and The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Ccitation are defined by two competing rulebooks: the ALWD Citation Manual: A Professional System of Citation and The Bluebook: A Uniform System of CCitation Manual: A Professional System of Citation and The Bluebook: A Uniform System of CCitation and The Bluebook: A Uniform System of CitationCitation.

To date, the standard legal citation manuals, the McGill Guide (8th ed.)

The Neutral Citation Standard for Case Law was developed in 1998 by the Canadian Citation Committee, an informal group that brought together various specialists in legal information from the judiciary, academia and the publishing industry, including slawers Martin Felsky and Daniel Poulin.

TITLE: OSCOLA: The Oxford Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities.

The first section, consisting of rules 1 through 9, establishes general standards of citation and style for use in all forms of legal writing.

There are many standards used for citing Oxford uses OSCOLA (Oxford Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities).

The generally accepted standard for U.S. legal citations is the BlueBook, and in this case Rule 14... but this excerpt might get you going in the right direction.

Settling on a standard method for legal citation is one of the many daunting tasks that we will need to tackle as we move toward a linked data model for legal resources.

Let it be a guide that is truly uniform, a standard for legal citation practice in publishing, in the courts, in practice and in the academy.