Provincial Court - Civil is designed for ordinary people to handle
their legal disputes without the need to hire a lawyer.
Separating couples would be more able to resolve
legal disputes without the need for costly court proceedings.
The staff can help you learn about the court system and court procedures, get legal information, locate and fill out relevant court forms, find free legal advice, and learn about the options for resolving
your legal dispute without going to court.
Mediators are legal experts who try to determine opposing parties to solve
their legal dispute without a judge.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include,
without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of
legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor
disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
We reserve the right, but do not undertake the obligation to: (a) monitor or review the Sites and the Applications for violations of this Agreement and for compliance with our policies; (b) report to law enforcement authorities and / or take
legal action against anyone who violates this Agreement; (c) refuse, restrict access to or the availability of, or remove or disable (to the extent technologically feasible) any Contribution or any portion thereof that may violate this Agreement, the law or any of our policies or are excessive in size or burdensome
without prior notice to you; (d) manage the Sites and the Applications in a manner designed to protect our and third parties» rights and property or to facilitate the proper functioning of the Sites and the Applications; (e) screen our users or members, or attempt to verify the statements of our users or members and / or (f) monitor
disputes between you and other users or to termination or block you and other users for violations of this Agreement.
• Effective and accessible
dispute resolution arrangements to allow industry participants to address complaints or
disputes without the need for intervention by a regulator or formal
legal recourse.
USA Trade Tasting takes no position on any sovereignty
disputes between States; any reference to States, territories, or places on this site or in any USATT document or publication is
without prejudice to the outcome of any sovereignty
disputes,
legal disputes, or
dispute resolution processes between States.
You hereby indemnify Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC and undertake to keep Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC indemnified against any losses, damages, costs, liabilities and expenses (including
without limitation
legal expenses and any amounts paid by Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC to a third party in settlement of a claim or
dispute on the advice of the
legal advisers of Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC,) incurred or suffered by Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC arising out of any breach by you of any provision of these terms and conditions, or arising out of any claim that you have breached any provision of these terms and conditions.
As a
dispute between the Cuomo Administration and Canadian officials over the Peace Bridge drags on, Congressman Brian Higgins believes a settlement can be reached
without a long
legal fight.
There is disagreement in the courts and
legal academy about whether there is a constitutional right not to be a parent; there should be no
dispute that it is gravely immoral to make someone a parent (even of the most nascent form of human life, the embryo)
without their informed consent.
Learn how to prepare to go to court, research the law, and resolve your
dispute without having to go in front of a judge and get information and resources on other
legal topics that are not covered elsewhere in this Online Self - Help Center.
By extending school districts» obligation to pay for private school placements until all appeals are exhausted, the decision creates an incentive for parents to prolong litigation rather than to work collaboratively with school districts to resolve
disputes without delay; the increased liability for private tuition and
legal fees from needlessly prolonged litigation imposes an untenable burden on the already - strained budgets of local school districts and diverts resources away from providing educational services to all children.
What many people don't realize is that these
disputes can be resolved
without resorting to
legal means or killing of the cats.
chief operating officer for Frontier, David Walsh, confirmed that the royalties
dispute has been ongoing since April 2016
without legal action.
Speaking to Gamespot chief operating officer for Frontier, David Walsh, confirmed that the royalties
dispute has been ongoing since April 2016
without legal action.
Collaborative Divorce replaces the adversarial and combative
legal system with an approach that permits people to resolve their
disputes respectfully and
without the hostility and anger often caused by litigation.
An entire
legal system
without lawyers, even with upper and lower levels of
dispute resolution.
Some developments have been made
without a full consideration of the
legal and regulatory concerns and we do see the scope for
disputes over the next few years.
Another game changing contribution is in the
dispute resolution domain wherein a significant role has been carved out for
legal professionals to use their negotiating and problem solving skills for resolving issues
without taking them to Courts.
Considering the disadvantages of arbitration, its changing nature, and changes in the pool of available arbitrators, employers should consider another alternative; having agreements with their employees that all
legal disputes will be submitted to court, but only before a judge
without a jury (a «bench trial»).
Without prompt resolution,
legal disputes can drag on for years.
A person involved in a family law
dispute should be able to understand their rights and responsibilities
without having to apprehend the potential application of case law and then conduct the daunting
legal research necessary hunt it down.
Perhaps a sufficient knowledge of the principles of fundamental justice and the manifold ways in which
disputes can be resolved quickly, efficiently and cooperatively,
without the delay, expense and acrimony of the trial process, will usurp Judge Judy, Damages and Boston
Legal as our paradigms of
dispute resolution.
They cited
legal reasons, which were quickly swept away through examination of relevant texts, as well as the impossibility of resolving
disputes without the physical presence of all parties.
The reality is that this was a factual
dispute, not a
legal one, and
without that factual determination there was no
legal relief.
Most
legal disputes can be resolved
without going to trial.
Mediation is a method of alternative
dispute resolution that allows parties to settle
legal issues
without proceeding to trial.
So,
without doing any
legal research, how would you resolve this
dispute?
However, for reasons explained below, it is doubtful whether people on low income — particularly young people, who can not afford to pay for
legal advice, will be able to formally or informally resolve employment
disputes without free
legal advice.
The protection afforded by s. 111A goes hand in hand with the common law
without prejudice rule, which applies to make genuine attempts to settle a
dispute inadmissible in any subsequent
legal proceedings.
Where practicable, we assist clients in resolving
disputes without recourse to
legal proceedings.
The term alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) is used to describe various methods of resolving
legal conflicts
without the need for litigation.
Outside of a courtroom, the three parties sit down to discuss their
legal disputes or disagreements and make an effort to resolve the
legal conflict together
without resorting to litigation.
This is an online system that is programmed to help solve simple
legal disputes, like parking tickets,
without the need to go see an actual lawyer.
Haven't you overlooked the largest online
dispute resolution system operating globally and in Canada,
without any
legal counsel involved?
Our Environmental Litigation lawyers have built an impressive record resolving environmental
legal disputes at the negotiating table and in the courtroom
without hampering our clients» business operations.
In addition, the depiction of the standard of review
dispute as simply one of choosing between «a mixed fact and law exercise» or «an extricable
legal error»,
without regard for the nature of the decision - maker, was explicitly rejected by the Court in Intact.
A settlement conference provides both parties in a
legal dispute with the opportunity to sit with a Provincial court judge to explore ways to settle their case
without going to trial.
So
without the opportunity for UK first instance courts to refer novel or
disputed legal points to the CJEU, we may see more IP appeals reaching the Supreme Court than before.
I presume that Lee has in mind the 70 % who don't use lawyers in family law
disputes, the 70 %
without powers of attorney, the 60 %
without wills, the 40 % who do nt seek
legal advice when injured, the 1/3 who know that they have
legal problems yet don't seek
legal assistance and the 85 % who don't seek
legal assistance for justiciable problems.
[6] Alternative
legal services (ALSs) are, for example: clinics of various types; self - help webpages; phone - in services; paralegal and law student programs; family mediation services; social justice tribunals; and court procedures simplification projects; arbitration and mediation for
dispute resolution; public
legal education information services; programs for targeted (unbundled) limited retainer
legal services (as distinguished from a full retainer to provide the whole
legal service); pro bono (free)
legal services for short and simple cases; and, the National Self - Represented Litigants Project, the purpose of which is to help self - represented litigants to be better litigants
without lawyers.
The advantage of this initiative is that it provides avenues to resolve family
disputes without resorting to litigation, which is often the only way that many eligible for
legal aid can receive funds.
In the event global settlement is not reached, the program would provide the parties with a summary of the facts inputted, the terms of any agreements reached that could potentially be incorporated into a separation agreement or consent order, and the
legal issues remaining in
dispute, again
without revealing the parties» positions on those issues.
You hereby indemnify High Conflict Institute, LLC and undertake to keep High Conflict Institute, LLC indemnified against any losses, damages, costs, liabilities and expenses (including
without limitation
legal expenses and any amounts paid by High Conflict Institute, LLC to a third party in settlement of a claim or
dispute on the advice of High Conflict Institute, LLC's
legal advisers) incurred or suffered by High Conflict Institute, LLC arising out of any breach by you of any provision of these terms and conditions, or arising out of any claim that you have breached any provision of these terms and conditions.
(b) Collaborative law is a procedure in which the parties and their counsel agree in writing to use their best efforts and make a good faith attempt to resolve their dissolution of marriage
dispute on an agreed basis
without resorting to judicial intervention except to have the court approve the settlement agreement, make the
legal pronouncements, and sign the orders required by law to effectuate the agreement of the parties as the court determines appropriate.
Collaborative law is an out - of - court
legal process that allows each party to retain a specially trained lawyer whose job is to help them settle their
dispute without court involvement.
Collaborative Divorce is a procedure in which the parties and their counsel agree in writing to use their best efforts and make a good faith attempt to resolve their dissolution of marriage
disputes on an agreed basis
without resorting to judicial intervention except to have the court approve the settlement agreement, make the
legal pronouncements, and sign the orders required by law to effectuate the agreement of the parties as the court determines appropriate.
This enables you to participate in property
dispute settlement and conciliation and negotiate a settlement with or
without your lawyer present to provide
legal support.
A court mediator is someone who is typically certified by the court system to help parties to a
legal dispute settle their differences
without actually having to go before a judge.