Sentences with phrase «legal doctrine called»

You are legally required to keep rental premises livable in Indiana, under a legal doctrine called the «implied warranty of habitability.»

When a claim is against the bus driver, district, or municipality, the case can become very complicated because of a legal doctrine called sovereign immunity.

However, Connecticut uses a legal doctrine called modified comparative negligence to assign fault.

However, Nevada uses a legal doctrine called modified comparative negligence to assign fault.

However, Wyoming uses a legal doctrine called modified comparative negligence to assign fault.

However, Mississippi uses a legal doctrine called pure comparative negligence to assign fault.

However, California uses a legal doctrine called pure comparative negligence to assign fault.

Victims may be able to pursue damages not only from the driver but also from the driver's employer through a legal doctrine called vicarious liability.

However, West Virginia uses a legal doctrine called modified comparative negligence to assign fault.

However, New Mexico uses a legal doctrine called pure comparative negligence to assign fault.

When Ontario's land titles system does the above, it follows an outdated legal doctrine called «deferred indefeasibility» (or delayed guarantee).

However, Idaho uses a legal doctrine called modified comparative negligence to assign fault.

Also, Massachusetts recognizes a legal doctrine called vicarious liability, which holds an employer liable for careless acts that an employee commits during the course and scope of employment.

However, South Carolina uses a legal doctrine called modified comparative negligence to assign fault.

However, Louisiana uses a legal doctrine called pure comparative negligence to assign fault.

Massachusetts also recognizes a key legal doctrine called vicarious liability.

However, Tennessee uses a legal doctrine called modified comparative negligence to assign fault.

However, New Hampshire uses a legal doctrine called modified comparative negligence to assign fault.

Not exact matches

Legal experts say Trump could invoke a doctrine called executive privilege to try to stop Comey from testifying.

God's covenant with Noah which asks fallen humanity to establish a society based on reverence for life and a legal justice that protects the innocent human beings from the murderer who is around; and God's call to Moses to liberate the Israelite people from Pharaoh's slavery; and God permitting monarchy with new perils of oligarchy to destroy the more human Tribal Federation to liberate the Israelites from the technically superior Philistines in Palestine; and Paul's doctrine that the Roman State, which he knew had its role in crucifying Jesus.

The legal doctrine that allows this type of claim against a third party is called vicarious liability.

Apart... from the question of contract..., it is said that in revenue cases there is a doctrine that the Court may ignore the legal position and regard what is called «the substance of the matter», and that here the substance of the matter is that the annuitant was serving the Duke for something equal to his former salary or wages, and that therefore, while he is so serving, the annuity must be treated as salary or wages.

(correct test for Barrister appeals; whether outside the ex improviso rule, prosecutor may call evidence after prosecution and defence case closed; use of debarring orders against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance of a prosecution witness; whether BSB has power to summons witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back of the defence; whether such communication redolent of actual bias of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on appeal; whether apparent bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct of judge; legal effect of serving BSB prosecutions department officer being 1 of 4 appointing members of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power of removal of member of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR Article 6 guarantees against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given key role of BSB prosecutions department in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB of notes of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge until day before appeal and despite requests and application for disclosure by defence)

Judicial Notice is a legal doctrine (rule) wherein the court can recognize and accept as «fact» the existence of certain facts without the parties having to call evidence to establish that proposed facts.

The legal doctrine is called respondeat superior, which is Latin for, «Let the master answer.»

The legal doctrine that provides for this exception is called the Attractive Nuisance Ddoctrine that provides for this exception is called the Attractive Nuisance DoctrineDoctrine.

Let's start with doctrine: — Current copyright literature Next to Genie Tyburski and the wonderful Virtual Chase — Virtual Chase Legal Research guide: Intellectual Property Law From Slaw's own Ted Tjaden, some Canadian links — Intellectual Property Law — Canada Pausing only to suppress my occasional cynicism about the length of time that Canada's policy - making on copyright has been going on, at least they have good resources explaining the process — Copyright Reform Process A few comparative links: the United Kingdom — Copyright on the UK Patent Office Site Next New Zealand — New Zealand Copyright Law How to do research on Australian copyright law — Intellectual Property Research in Australia Now two important US sites: first the authorized version — The US Copyright Office Next, a wonderful site that reflects some of Larry Lessig «s thinking at Stanford — The Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center And finally, reflecting the fact that so much law in this area reflects not domestic policy - making, but hard - fought international consensus, an Index to what the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a United Nations agency has accomplished — WIPO Index And to conclude with an American and a European take on international copyright, since I was just in Chicago, look at Irene Berkey's links — International Intellectual Property and finally a European source (actually it's Swiss, but that's not obviousRobert Kraft, in his Diaries, quotes Stravinsky, la justice — c’est une invention suisse)-- Swiss Legal Research Center International IP Links, run by CMS von Erlach Henrici And finally, a nice and quirky piece on the oddities of copyright called — Digital Copyright & Copywrong by Peter Jacso.

For one thing, as he did in his lecture on «The Decline of Legal Doctrine» last year, which I commented on here, Justice Stratas calls upon us to devote ourselves to shoring up this weakened edifice.

Last week, at the Canadian Constitution Foundation's Law and Freedom 2016 conference, Justice David Stratas of the Federal Court of Appeal delivered a fascinating lecture called «The Decline of Legal Doctrine.»

Legal doctrine is, in other words, a form of pre-commitment that will save us from the siren calls of rights - crushing emergency.

The name of the legal doctrine that allows a criminal judgment to have this effect in a civil case is called «collateral estoppel» which is also sometimes called «issue preclusion».

A doctrine of maritime law sometimes called the custodia legis rule, suggests that while a vessel is seized under legal process (in custodia legis), it is shielded from, and can not be subject to, maritime liens.

States such as Pennsylvania used to follow an unofficial legal code called the «Tender Years Doctrine».