Sentences with phrase «legal establishment»

It is a before - your - eyes meltdown of the liberal legal establishment reputation's for intellectual rigor.

This is an issue the Canadian legal establishment would rather not see get any attention at all.

Legal establishment of paternity does not automatically award an unwed father custody; it only means that he's in a position to ask the court for it.

In synagogue and church and home, most citizens have used the Bible both for salvation and for the ordering of life — voluntarily, through persuasion, not by legal establishment.

The conservative nature of the French legal establishment can be seen by her description of finding leftover notepaper in 1964 headed, «The French State, Vichy.»

In the normal course of events politicians rarely go to jail; not necessarily because they have more virtuous characters than the rest of us, but because they can usually afford better lawyers and character witnesses (and being part of the political / legal establishment probably doesn't hurt either).

The singling out of them, as well as the Law Society's rather banal allegations, seems to me to be shabby and tokenistic placation of opinion by the Toronto legal establishment, at the expense of two relatively defenceless scapegoats.»

Elizabeth Olson of the New York Times reports that the bar exam as a professional standard «is facing a new round of scrutiny — not just from the test takers but from law school deans and some state legal establishments.»

A sold - out auditorium of over 600 demonstrated «restlessness» with the conservative Spanish legal establishment.

The entire Canadian legal establishment is in denial.

«Religious bond - age shackles and debil - itates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial.

The free exercise of religion allows a religious community to democratically agitate for its legal establishment and for a confessional state.

So if your point in posting that quote to was to speak out against the legal establishment of christianity in the nation... then I agree with you.

«Exposure: The contextomy leaves out the crucial part of the sentence which shows that Madison was not arguing against Christianity per se, but against its legal establishment, or the establishment of any religion.

Madison was presumably dating the legal establishment of Christianity to the reign of Constantine, the first Christian emperor of Rome, in the early fourth century, that is, «almost fifteen centuries» earlier.

@clarity - «During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial.

Nord is perceptive in revealing secularism as an operative religion within the educational and legal establishments.

Paternity is the legal establishment of the identity of a child's father.

Legal aid cuts have been condemned by many in the legal establishment (who Mr Grayling will have to work with if he is to make a success of his new position), and by MPs, including one who has just been made a Minister in his department.

The legal establishment of Northern Ireland has launched a criminal prosecution against Peter Hain...

Tackle illegal mining inside protected areas and pursue the legal establishment of artisanal mining cooperatives in areas close to gorilla habitats

The legal establishment, in short, has begun a love affair with all things brain.

Why is the legal establishment constantly promoting the idea of «independence».

In fact, he was often Canada's only free speech advocate, which should be an embarrassment to Canada's legal establishment.»

The legal establishment won't talk about the obvious solutions.

I don't see a prospect for any real change in the attitude of the legal establishment until such time as we see some judgments that acknowledge the bias and how pervasive it is.

However, I think it is abundantly clear that the culture of the legal establishment is threatened by the prospect of transparency.

Support reached deep into the legal establishment.

Is this why the legal establishment is not engaging in proactive planning with AI?

I think it is fair to say that the legal establishment's inherent bias results in a ongoing effort to stigmatize self - represented litigants.

Our institutions need to get together to re-examine how the legal establishment's original mandate — as guardians of the Rule of Law — can be harnessed to meet the existential challenge that AI poses to that mandate, indeed if at all.

While global leaders in the AI movement proactively research AI safety — and in fact explicitly recognize that this entails «many areas, from economics and law to technical topics «-- the leaders from the legal establishment trail behind.

Mr. Budgell is right when he notices «the legal establishment's inherent bias results in a ongoing effort to stigmatize self - represented litigants».

What we have not seen yet is any indication that this call to action has even registered with the legal establishment, even though it is the profession, law societies and the judiciary — not the tech entrepreneur and scientific communities — who are the acknowledged champions of the Rule of Law.

I believe if the legal establishment starts this discussion, we will also begin to strengthen our competitive advantage in the areas we are strongest (ethics, conflict of interest, law reform, etc.) and not make the mistake of playing the Future game according to the rules set by others with different skill sets (business consulting firms, accounting and pure tech sector, to name a few).

The computer scientists, entrepreneurs and innovators leading AI are driving the hype, but they are also dictating change and disruption whether the legal establishment desires it or not.

A better alternative, I am beginning to think, would be that the legal establishment start assembling its stakeholders to get a hand on that trigger switch before the whole thing blows.

The legal establishment continues to ignore, encourage and apparently benefit from discrimination that denies most people any practical access to what is termed the «justice system».

«The problems we face are compounded by the dogged refusal of too many in the legal establishment to put the defence of our civilisation ahead of the defence of the traditions with which their profession has grown comfortable.»

The legal establishment doesn't want juries, except for show trials and some other specific circumstances.

It doesn't yet seem to have occurred to anyone in the legal establishment that arrangements that were largely settled a great many years / decades / even centuries ago are no longer serving us.

I am rather skeptical that Drew Perry, Neil Cohen and Marston Grindey qualify as voices speaking for interests other than those of the legal establishment.

Even all the talking about access to justice inside the legal establishment seems to mostly steer clear of controversial topics and ideas (think para-legals, SRLs, unbundled legal services...).