Oct 4, 2016 — Model updates: The CBR1000RR SP2 is a road
legal homologation special using the CBR1000RR SP as a base, ready for race use.
Porsche's 2014 911 911 Turbo S is the quickest - accelerating road - going series production 911 to date: faster than the latest 911 GT3 («Reloaded,» Sept. 2), faster than the 997 GT2 RS and faster than the road -
legal homologation version of the Le Mans - winning 911 GT1.
Not exact matches
But about 5 months later, the decision was reversed on the grounds that, in the eyes of the Spanish system, McBride did not hold a master's degree or a Ph.D. «The forwarded documentation,» said the official rejection letter, «has not gone through any of the two
legal processes, neither of
homologation nor of recognition, for the mentioned title to be valid in Spain, neither for academic nor for professional purposes.»
Following the design that Porsche had laid out with their 911
homologation special, the GT1, Mercedes - AMG was tasked by Mercedes - Benz with creating an extreme racing car that still maintained some elements of a normal street
legal car.
In contrast to the race version of the MC12, of which street -
legal versions were produced for
homologation purposes, the MC12 Corsa is intended for private use, albeit restricted to the track, as the Corsa's modifications make it illegal to drive on the road.
Porsche originally needed to produce the car in order to comply with
homologation regulations and had intended on marketing it as a street
legal race vehicle like the 1973 Carrera 2.7 RS.
BMW built 167 road -
legal versions based on the European ETCC - spec racer for
homologation purposes.
1997 Lotus Elise GT1 - A by - product of GT
homologation regulations at the time, the one - off Lotus Elise GT1 is about as extreme as road -
legal Lotus Elise variants come.
Therefore, the
homologation process in Ecuador implies that the party that seeks the enforcement of a foreign award shall file a petition with the Provincial Court8, which will assess whether the award complies with the following requirements: (i) The international award complies with the formalities required for it to be considered authentic in the state where it was issued; (ii) The award is final and binding in the jurisdiction where it was delivered and the attachments are duly legalized; (iii) With regard to the requirement prescribed in the Convention, if the award is in a language other than the official language of the country, in this case Spanish, it shall incorporate a translation; (iv) It is shown from the
legal papers of the arbitration proceedings that the party against whom the awards is being enforced was duly notified of the claim and that there was no due process violation; (v) The petition must specify the domicile of the party against whom the award is being enforced.
Those who have defended the
homologation process for international awards or judgments justify their position by claiming that there is a
legal necessity to verify that any international judgment and award comply with Ecuadorian legislation and are not violating public policy issues.