(For an in - depth discussion of
the legal issues before the court, see this post at Patent Baristas.)
Ultimately, I believe judges should emulate Justice Knazan the next time they are faced with a case that centres around Twitter (or Facebook, snapchat, kik, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, tumblr, instagram, Tinder, etc...) and put it to the participants in the matter to explain how the platform works, why the evidence should be accepted and what relevance any of it has to
the legal issue before the court.
Not exact matches
According to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), a firm has to procure a
court order
before repossessing a vehicle belonging to a member of the military, a law that was established to protect soldiers and other military personnel from having to deal with
legal issues while they're actively serving.
She practices in the areas of insurance, general litigation and medical -
legal issues and has appeared
before all levels of
court in Alberta and the Northwest Territories.
What availed as the common wisdom of mankind until the day
before yesterday — for example, that man, woman, mother, and father name natural realities as well as social roles, that children
issue naturally from their union, that the marital union of man and woman is the foundation of human society and provides the optimal home for the flourishing of children — all this is now regarded by many as obsolete and even hopelessly bigoted, as
court after
court, demonstrating that this revolution has profoundly transformed even the meaning of reason itself, has declared that this bygone wisdom now fails even to pass the minimum
legal threshold of rational cogency.
He said that Burroughs had been sworn in
before Circuit
Court Judge Arthur Dunne
issued a stay order on Washington appointments that were approved May 9 by the City Council and that the Netsch appointment, approved June 6, was not covered by the order and not subject to a
legal challenge.
Since the Supreme
Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the
Court having done so at least three times and counting, first
before the Nov 4 general election and twice
before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of
Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen&ra
Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives
issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing
legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen&ra
legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme
Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».
The
legal issues are now
before the
court to be resolved.»
5.3 All the people of Rep. of Cyprus (even the President of RoC) MUST apply to the
LEGAL SYSTEM of Northern Cyprus about an
issue related with north Cyprus in order to take their cases to the ECtHR: ECtHR 04.01.2011 decision: «the procedure
before the Immovable Property Commission («IPC»), and further appeal to the «TRNC» High Administrative
Court, provided for in Law 67/2005, were to be regarded as «domestic remedies» of the respondent State and that NO GROUND OF EXEMPTION has been established in that regard».
According to a Motion on Notice filed
before a Federal High
Court sitting in Akure, the applicant through his
legal team led by Dr Remi Oyebanji, described the remand order
issued and dated August 24, 2016 by the first respondent (Justice Akeredolu) and executed by the second respondent through his officers as illegal and unconstitutional.
• School Expansion, Growth & Strategic Planning • State and Federal Employment Law • School Board and Nonprofit Governance • Administrative Law & Appeals of State and Federal Agency Decisions and Actions • Special Investigations &
Legal / Compliance Audits • Policy Guidance and Development • Constitutional Challenges and Claims • School Employee and School Board Training • Litigation in Federal and State
Courts • Administrative Hearings and Appeals
Before State and Federal Agencies • Public Entity Purchasing and Procurement; Business Transactions; & Contract Negotiation, Review and Drafting • Construction Law, AIA Construction Contracts, Review and Drafting • Real Estate Transactions and Condemnation • Special Education under IDEA and Section 504 • Student Rights & Discipline
Issues and Hearings • State and Federal Claims of Discrimination • State and Federal Civil Rights • Administrative Grievances and Hearings • False Claims Act / Qui Tam Defense for Local Government Entities
I just bought some real estate with some of my emergency fund that needed several months
before I could properly finance it due to some
legal issues with the deed that needed to go through
court because there was a deceased person on the title.
The EPA will have to justify to a
court why the
legal issues in the CPP — which, again, were in the midst of being decided by the DC Circuit
before Pruitt told the
court to drop it — are so severe as to require immediate repeal, with no replacement ready to go.
«This is the first time this
issue has been squarely
before the
courts and the first time
before the Supreme
Court of Canada,» Janes told
Legal Feeds.
The public interest demands that the disputes and
legal issues brought
before the
courts be resolved in a timely and effective manner, all the while maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.
Thomas Bruce, Director of the
Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School, spoke
before the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee specifically to the Judiciary's Subcommittee on
Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet who are exploring
issues related to judicial transparency and ethics.
Again, this applies at the inception of the private prosecution, where, for example, the defence might be able to demonstrate that the evidence in the information laid
before the Magistrates
Court has been obtained in breach of undertakings given in other
legal proceedings, such that no summons or arrest warrant should be
issued.
While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot
courts, during which students argued questions of law
before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on
legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot
courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week
before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would
issue a written opinion.124
We also have an extensive amicus practice
before the US Supreme
Court and other appellate
courts and regularly brief, argue, and advise on complex
legal issues that arise in various trial - level fora.
Counsels the operator of one of the largest mining projects in the Southern Hemisphere on general
legal and tax
issues; representation of the same
before local
courts and authorities
Before reaching the
legal issues, the
court provided a lengthy rendition of the TAR 1.0 process, where senior partners (or a small team) do all of the training.
In this current electronic age there are even more resources available (at no cost) for conducting
legal research online than ever
before (for example, there is now the CanLii system and our own
court's website — which includes the vast majority of the
court's written reasons
issues since 1999, at least).
93 One of our fundamental beliefs is that lawyers generally — not just constitutional advocates
before the United States Supreme
Court — need access to the scope of arguments available through a global approach.94 Consequently, we think the advocacy component of the traditional LRW course may be the best place to think about incorporating a global
legal issue.
[29] Self - represented litigants whose aim it is to protract
court proceedings to force the other side to expend significant resources on legal costs due to scurrilous allegations that are without any evidentiary foundation and are entirely irrelevant to the issue before the Court will meet the hammer of a cost's a
court proceedings to force the other side to expend significant resources on
legal costs due to scurrilous allegations that are without any evidentiary foundation and are entirely irrelevant to the
issue before the
Court will meet the hammer of a cost's a
Court will meet the hammer of a cost's award.
The
courts, and the LSUC's panels
before them, wrestled with no fewer than three important
legal issues in reaching their decisions.
The Chief Justice of Canada, the Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, addressed the latter in her recent lecture to the Canadian Bar Association, but I do not perceive that she or anyone else in the
legal community have addressed the fundamental
issue that the SRL phenomenon raises: the right to participate in the making of common law; the ability to put a set of interests
before the
courts that hitherto have not been able to afford to be there — and thus, a rather significant challenge to the validity of the whole body of common law as it stands.
I guess the Supreme
Court issued another banal decision which reinforces the
legal wisdom of going
before the
courts as either a crap shoot or the judges decide based on personal ideological predilections and wrapped up in res or decisis.
According to the Toronto Star, the PM changed his story to suggest he foresaw a
court challenge and legal issue that he and his advisers were surprised at as it had never arisen before and thus was consulting with «outside» legal experts on a matter that was likely to end up being referred to the Supreme C
court challenge and
legal issue that he and his advisers were surprised at as it had never arisen
before and thus was consulting with «outside»
legal experts on a matter that was likely to end up being referred to the Supreme
CourtCourt.
While we see more legislation criminalising peaceful protest, repressive legislation for asylum seekers, and with
Courts busier than ever
before in family and care proceedings, more and more people will face these
issues without
legal representation.
They met the evening
before for an educational session by
legal clinic staff about the
Court and the
legal issues.
You do not have to wait for the other parent to
issue Court proceedings against you
before you approach a specialist solicitor to find out about your
legal position in confidence.
Feb. 2013 — after arguing for over two years that the lawsuits should not be heard in Canada, HudBay abruptly abandons this
legal argument and concedes the lawsuits can be heard in Canadian
courts, just
before an Ontario
court was set to determine the
issue.
We have also appeared
before the Supreme
Court of Canada addressing various prison law
issues including the writ of habeas corpus, appropriate sentencing credit for pre-trial custody, the interpretation of
legal grounds for pre-trial detention and the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences.
This book covers the most fundamental
legal and practical
issues that Canadian patent lawyers and patent agents are likely to face in everyday practice
before the
courts and the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO).
The Competition has law students from a number of prominent U.S. law schools present a mock
legal issue as if they were
before the U.S. Supreme
Court.
The appeal raised significant
legal issues never
before decided by the
court, including whether a domain name can be considered property that is subject to seizure under Kentucky law and whether a domain name can be considered a gambling device under the law.
The cost of
legal proceedings can be prohibitive for many individuals, so much so that
legal issues are going unresolved or litigants are opting for self - representation
before the
courts.
Indeed, one thing that struck me about recent Twitter and online commentary was that many conservatives who have criticized Justice Ginsburg for her extrajudicial statements wrote approvingly of recent public statements she made about the importance of due process in Title IX proceedings, without mentioning broader concerns about extrajudicial statements on
legal issues that may come
before the
Court or about
issues that are part of current political debate.
The Law Society's view (and one must be cautious here as the practice note advises that the solicitor takes independent
legal advice — I would personally suggest that any solicitor grappling with this
issue seeks an emergency declaration
before the High
Court) is that TA 2000, ss 19 and 21A do not override
legal privilege.
Together they provide an unparalleled combination of extensive experience providing conflicts of interest
legal opinions, representing government clients in Commission investigations, representing clients in public hearings
before the Commission and litigating ethics
issues in both trial and appellate
courts.
Routinely appearing
before arbitrators, federal and state
courts, and administrative agencies, he has handled mediations, arbitrations, injunctions, trials, and appeals covering a wide range of complex
legal issues, including:
As trusted
legal advisors to both corporate and individual clients, we focus on delivering strategic resolutions to workplace
issues, as well as, representation of our clients» interests
before the
courts.
Suzanne has extensive appellate experience and has handled well over 300 appeals involving diverse
legal issues, including numerous arguments
before the Florida Supreme
Court, the Eleventh Circuit
Court of Appeals and all the district
courts of appeal in the State of Florida.
Also, the exchange of Financial Statements long
before a
court date will allow the parties» respective lawyers to provide accurate
legal advice on matters such as the range of child or spousal support that may be owed from one spouse to another; this can reduce or even eliminate the time that a
court would have to spend determining the
issue.
The
Court relied heavily on guidelines given by the Family Division in Coventry City Council v C [2013] EWHC 2190 (Fam), where the
Court stated that every social worker must be satisfied that the person giving consent has capacity to do so, and that even if the person does not lack capacity that the social worker must be satisfied that the consent is fully informed (meaning that the parent must understand the consequences of giving consent, the range of choices available, the consequences of refusal and of giving consent, and must be in possession of all the facts and
issues material to the giving of consent), fair and proportionate, and where possible parents must obtain
legal advice
before consenting.
The
court also reviewed, with references to the Rules of Professional Conduct, such
issues as: at what point a solicitor - client relationship arises (hint:
BEFORE the retainer is in place); what constitutes «
legal advice» and the boundary «between general
legal information and
legal advice»; a lawyer's duty of confidentiality (including in respect of non-clients); and a lawyer's duty of care to non-clients.
To gain a working knowledge of the unique role the Supreme
Court plays in our
legal system — identifying and resolving important disputed recurring
issues of federal law — and of the demands thus placed on lawyers who practice
before it;
Since April 2011 all couples whose marriages break up have had to consider mediation first
before turning to the
legal system to settle disputes, although cases involving domestic violence or child protection
issues still go straight to
court.
This is to show that you've tried to resolve your
issues before starting
legal action in the
court.
If you have a
legal issue, you should contact a lawyer
before making a decision about what to do or applying to the
Court.