Sentences with phrase «legal opinion on any subject»

The Content does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion on any subject matter.

It does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion on any subject matter.

Not exact matches

The spinoff will remain subject to certain other conditions, including the receipt of a legal opinion on the tax - free treatment of the deal under U.S. federal tax laws, Yahoo said in a regulatory filing.

Kenneth Armstrong, professor of European Law at Cambridge University, says this is the «dominant legal opinion» on the subject and the authors of the Article are in agreement.

The Fort Schuyler Management Corp., charged with managing the program, is still refusing to release information sought by Investigative Post despite a legal opinion recently issued by the State Committee on Open Government that concluded the agency is subject to the Freedom of Information Law.

This is supposedly based on standard «self defense» war doctrine which is recognized by United Nations, although specific legal issues are subject to much debating and frequently are more a matter of opinion than law.

Alain Kaloyeros and his associates at Fort Schuyler wouldn't budge when the state Committee on Open Government issued a legal opinion in March that rejected their position that they aren't subject to the FOI Law.

A primary role of legal opinions in business transactions is to provide assurance that the documents are valid, binding, and enforceable, subject to certain qualifications, based on the opinion giver's adherence to certain due diligence procedures and standards of care.

For example, if I had to write a legal opinion, the system would give me a list of the tasks that need to be performed: just one click on the legal opinion in my to - do - list and the system provides me instantly with all of the relevant case law and the legal opinions already written by the firm on that same subject.

See Brugger, supra n. 141, at 647 (stating that while Tucker's moot court was «no innovation in legal training,» Tucker enjoyed using it); Butler, supra n. 143, at 29 (stating that «with the higher view of preparing students for speaking and writing on legal subjects, it will be useful to exercise their minds by forensic debates in moot courts, and by requiring from them written opinions on questions of law, and readings and dissertations on statutes and other themes, as circumstances permit»); Laub, supra n. 144, at 14 (quoting Reed's letter to the Dickinson College Trustees on a course of study); Barrow, supra n. 148, at 289.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

COPRAC's hypotheticals indicate that publishing a blog that demonstrates your knowledge of your practice area will not subject you to attorney advertising restrictions if it contains information but not offers of availability; the same is true if the blog contains articles of opinion or information on legal issues outside your practice area and does not offer your services.

Those who rely on a Justice Department legal opinion should not be subject to criminal investigation when «the political winds change,» Mukasey told the House Judiciary Committee.

It also promotes Select Legal as opinion leaders on this subject and promotes LAWFUSION — Select's flagship Practice Management System.

Speaking to a solicitor from Ashtons Legal, I have gained some insight into their use of AI and his opinion on the subject.

Contacted by AvocatNet, a reputed online portal and forum containing legal updates and professional opinion on various matters, Managing Associate Daniel Vinerean provided information regarding the delicate subject of potential abuse an employee returning from parental leave could face from their employer.

From the title you already get it; it's about the role of expert witnesses in various subject fields, the legal challenges involved and the personal opinions of these expert witnesses on how courts operate in their given subject fields.

Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational structure and content described in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may pay flat fee to internet marketing company for exclusive website listing for particular county in specific practice area if listing includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer stating the listings are paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service - legal directory, provided there is no fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside jurisdictions of the lawyer's license, fee is not based on number of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not exercise discretion in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for legal services in exchange for flat annual membership fee if website exercises no discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may pay internet advertising service fee determined by the number of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer provided that the service does not steer business to any particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the exercise of human discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.

Any Excavation Contractor worth his salt knows about everything that has been covered on this subject herein, and yet Karen P., seems to need to get the whole story, here on REM, (Heino must be proud) plus she needed to be advised to call her lawyer (she recently dealt with) in order to get advice on how to go about getting a legal opinion!