Not exact matches
Further
legal changes will come in effect in July 2016, when pet shop
owners will be required to keep records
of every
dog sold from the store (see http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-20/new-law-changes-will-smash-puppy-farm-business-model/6405572).
A letter sent by the City
of Montreal dated August 21, 2017 gave 520 pit bull
owners, who either failed to comply with all the requirements to register their
dog or didn't complete all requirements for registration, four weeks to either get rid
of their or face
legal action.
After all, as awful and shocking as it sounds to American
dog owners like us, the sale
of dog meat for human consumption is still
legal in China.
Ever since Elmer and Ammon Zimmerman,
owners of E&A and A&J Kennels in Berks County, shot and killed their 80
dogs sometime between Thursday, July 24 and Tuesday, July 29, questions about the law that makes this cowardly and inhumane act «
legal» have surfaced. Many have inquired as to why licensed kennel operators are permitted to legally shoot their breeding stock, believing that private citizens were prohibited from this same gruesome form
of euthanasia, and if you think so too, think again.
Owners entering assisted living or passing away without provisions for their pet in a
legal will are frequent circumstances for the arrival
of senior
dogs in shelters.
When taking custody
of dogs already in the
legal possession
of an
owner or organization, the Pit Bull Rescuer will require the submission
of a signed surrender form which clearly states transfer
of ownership to the Rescuer.
Individuals who have an AKC Handler number, a PHA number or are listed as agent on any
dog in the regular or non-regular classes may not show a sweepstakes entrant unless they are the sole
owner registered with the AKC or co-own the entry with a member
of their immediate family (as defined above) or a
legal domestic partner.
Within this decree,
dog owners must hold a license for housing any one
of these
dog breeds, hold no criminal records, be
of legal age, hold liability insurance
of 120 000 euros and be mentally / physically healthy.
The
owners of each
dog claimed regular wellness veterinary care, but none went beyond a discount vaccine clinic and based on records, none had been actually examined in years (there is an abysmal
legal loophole in Florida that allows vaccines to be administered to patients by technicians or assistants without an examination as long as a licensed veterinarian is in the building).
The Seattle Animal Shelter is not able to provide immediate staff response to each complaint, but, with the assistance, involvement and cooperation
of the complainant, Seattle Animal Shelter can take
legal action against the
owners of the errant
dog (s).
There is no
legal definition
of a «puppy mill,» so don't be fooled by pet store
owners who show you «papers» or licenses to prove that their
dogs are from humane sources.
Unlike service
dogs, who are allowed access pretty much everywhere by Federal law, the only
legal rights ESAs have are reasonable accommodation in no - pet housing, and the right to accompany their
owners in the cabin
of a commercial aircraft without having to be kept in a container or to pay a pet transportation fee — typically at least $ 100 one way.
The panic that ensues causes the number
of medium - to - large
dogs in shelters and rescues to increase as
owners face insurance cancellations and the
legal ramifications
of keeping even well - behaved pets.
To make matters worse, you are now in a situation where you are facing the reality
of dealing with an insurance claim or other
legal action against the
dog owner, as well as financial difficulties stemming from your medical bills and from being unable to work.
Loudoun County, VA has strict definitions and
legal requirements for
owners of dogs and other potentially dangerous animals.
To successfully apply the scienter method
of legal approach, you must be able to prove that the canine previously bit a person, or at least acted as if it wanted to bite another person, AND that the
dog's
owner was aware
of the animal's prior behavior.
After an attack, you can usually hold the
owner of the
dog liable for your injuries with the help
of your
legal team.
If you or someone you love is the victim
of aggressive
dogs or any other kind
of animal bite or attack because
of a pet
owner's negligence in the Frisco area, discuss your
legal rights and options immediately with an experienced Frisco
dog bite attorney at the Weaver Injury Law Firm.
Under the
legal doctrine
of scienter, a
dog owner may not be liable for a
dog bite if the
dog had never bitten somebody or had never shown a propensity to attack in the past.
Alternatively, if strict liability does not apply, a
dog owner may still be responsible for the acts
of his or her animals under the
legal theory
of negligence.
The
legal «
owner»
of the
dog can include not just the
dog's actual
owner, but also anyone who «possesses, keeps, or harbors» a
dog.
Victims
of dog or other animal bites may wrongly believe that they have no
legal recourse for recovery
of medical bills or other damages.The
owner of the
dog or other animal is ultimately responsible for the economic loss, harm, pain and suffering that arise out
of an incident.
This is because
of a special Ohio statute that regulates the liability (
legal responsibility)
of a
dog's
owner, harborer, or keeper.
Florida has a specific
legal statute that makes
dog owners virtual insurers
of their
dog's conduct, imposing «strict liability.»
In
legal terms, this means that the
owner of the
dog can be held strictly liable for any serious or fatal injuries that someone sustains as a result
of their
dog's bite.
Other states and countries have adopted the doctrine
of comparative fault, which «compares» the
legal responsibility
of the victim and the other parties, and provides compensation to the victim in direct proportion to the comparative responsibility
of the parties (i.e., if the
dog owner is 90 % responsible and the victim is only 10 % responsible, then the victim's compensation is reduced by his or her 10 %
of fault).
If the
owner was following the leash law and had their
dog properly vaccinated, regardless
of the victim's injuries,
legal action is difficult.