In the spirit of the fundamental
legal precept of pacta sunt servanda, the principles of the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) are binding upon parties to it and must be performed in good faith.
Adhering to
the legal precepts was righteousness under Mosaic Law back then.
It would obviously be a complete misunderstanding to take these «But I tell you» passages as formal
legal precepts of an external authority, which can be fulfilled by outward behavior.
The courts shall not look to
the legal precepts of other nations or cultures.
The word «other» implies that whatever religions the legislature considered to be part of domestic or Oklahoma culture would not have
their legal precepts prohibited from consideration, while all others would.
Indeed, they admitted at the preliminary injunction hearing that they did not know of even a single instance where an Oklahoma court had applied Sharia law or used
the legal precepts of other nations or cultures, let alone that such applications or uses had resulted in concrete problems in Oklahoma...
Therefore, if we substituted the word «religions» for «cultures,» the amendment would prohibit Oklahoma courts from «look [ing] to
the legal precepts of other... religions.»
If these courses aren't made more informative and lean on all
the legal precepts that is necessary to be a knowledgable real estate representative and also do away with the cheat sheets known as Passit, and require classroom learning of all registrants for residential and real property law courses, RECO might as well just farm out registrations and save the public the smokescreen that they're producing knowledgeable professionals.
Not exact matches
We can not of course go more closely here into the question why the Church has the right and duty, not only to promulgate and inculcate the
precepts of immutable divine law and to supervise its observance, but on its own initiative to go beyond this and lay down positive
legal prescriptions, and impose obedience to them as a Christian's duty, although they are enacted with full consciousness that they are not necessarily eternally valid but can be changed and even abolished.
The first thing is this: it's pretty hard to deny the
precepts of the «in the image of God» apologetic for the sanctity of life, and the Genesis / Ephesians apologetic for the presuppositional category of marriage standing prior to any
legal sanction of the thing.
Among the
precepts of Christ in the Gospels, and the
precepts with which they are illustrated and supplemented in the Epistles, there are few which could be applied as positive rules, to be followed mechanically, and enforced if necessary by
legal sanctions.
It is quite another to say that people who take those
precepts seriously may be enduring targets of litigation and
legal sanction if they have the temerity to voice those
precepts as their own and make them the ground of their acts even in their private settings.
Developed cultures contribute additional layers of differentiation, replacing myth and tradition with unified cosmologies and higher religions, articulating well - codified moral
precepts, and positing universalistic principles as modes of
legal and political legitimation.
But men have defrauded themselves of this opportunity by their expansion of the
precepts into a
legal system.
Grady outlines a number of Ive's key design
precepts and suggests how these might be applied to delivery of
legal services.
It also requires acquisition of new
legal concepts and
precepts, even a different
legal language.
On the basis of a history of NGO management, a few years of looking at technology projects in the
legal services field and the experience of this project, I would identify four crucial requirements for any technology project — most of these amount to repetition of well - honed management
precepts outside the technology sphere.
Somehow, this fundamental
precept has been missed by traditional providers of
legal services who service clients well, even when the ladder is leaning against the wrong house.