Sentences with phrase «legal publishers»

In the absence or organic growth and innovation, they are seen as essential both for survival and success for the major legal publishers in today's market conditions.

This is therefore a challenge for legal publishers who often need to deal with small print runs.

Here is a an informal survey of legal publisher websites, and what they offer for new publication current awareness.

No reference was made to any other legal publisher in the notice.

This question has plagued commercial legal publishers for more than two decades without anyone offering a clear answer.

What's the business model of the future for Canadian legal publishers?

The use of the term «historical» is used by legal publishers with limited access to the early case reports.

But I'll be sorry if it's no longer valued as part of our work as legal publishers.

By «we» I mean all legacy legal publishers who have been publishing secondary sources in print.

Other legal publishers offer some point - in - time services too.

There is nothing radical about a leading legal publisher jumping into the fierce competition for current awareness market share.

The big legal publishers do not have a monopoly on smart lawyers with good ideas and insights.

That changed when legal publishers realized that the legal profession was happy to see new editions published every year.

I can see that big legal publishers don't regard selling content to be the road to the future, but I'm not seeing much confidence for sale either.

Here one finds that legal publishers use vague expressions to such as «current» or «comprehensive» to describe the contents of a database.

Where legal publishers and subscribers part company is with regard to the updating program.

That's three years in which legal publishers need to shift their internal processes to accommodate new delivery, pricing and updating mechanisms for their content.

I think this may be an opportunity for small legal publishers.

Most legal publishers have developed their processes and their systems internally and they consider related knowledge as commercial secrets.

The future may see closer collaboration between traditional legal publishers and public legal educators to create these resources.

By now many legal publishers will be saying «Who?».

Listening to law librarians and developing an effective strategy to respond to their concerns is essential if legal publishers are to limit the effects of the cancellation of loose - leaf and online services.

Legal publishers try hard to make profits, so they know better how to make the law accessible?

Two major legal publishers announced initiatives this week to help laid - off lawyers keep their heads above water and make the transition to new jobs.

I've read a lot lately about how law firms are poised to essentially become legal publishers, and it's certainly true that the potential is there.

Now we've actual evidence of a major legal publisher going for print on demand.

I particularly enjoyed his comments on the mission statements of the three multinational legal publishers and how the big three are embarrassed to be seen as legal or tax publishers.

Over the past century or two, a practice evolved whereby legal publishers launched new editions of established works under the name of the original author long after that person passed from the scene.

The federal government funds a book publishing program that provides grants to Canadian print publishers, including legal publishers, based on revenues derived from books already published.

Right now print is often better as a delivery method and for economic reasons, but that may be because legal publishers have not yet found a good way to represent that information online.

The two major commercial legal publishers provide staggering amounts of free access to judges, students and professors.

Another major legal publishers lists a large number of law reports in its databases, instead of saying that the databases are comprehensive from a certain date.

I wonder whether legal publishers have a role in supporting efforts like this.

How can legal publishers best support the coming changes in the legal profession?

Not to knock them — legal publishers filled an essential niche and continue to provide valuable and necessary products.

I think it's a huge loss when legal publishers get discarded.

The major legal publishers generally describe their databases as comprehensive.

Initially both subscribers and legal publishers welcomed the publication of loose - leaf services.

But in what level of fantasy can we imagine a commercial legal publisher ever using such a model, for any constituency?

What an opportunity for 21st - century legal publishers.

This may change with time, as e-books with their own DOI, etc, become more widespread even amongst legal publishers, but it will not be soon.

The emergence of real competition in the market for legal information online, combined with the recent economic downturn, has been a major challenge for legal publishers everywhere.

We hope... to discuss pricing practices of legal publishers and their effects on law libraries and legal researchers.

None of the traditional Canadian legal publishers, seemed able or willing to commit the resources necessary to compete on the scale that was required.

Perhaps the most ubiquitous statement made, certainly not only by legal publishers but by them in any case, is the familiar «our people are our most important asset».

And what does this mean for our future as legal publishers?

It offers a comprehensive library of resources and materials from a leading legal publisher, all wrapped in an intuitive search and display environment, and delivered for a reasonable and predictable monthly price.

As with the Canadian flag debate of years past, the matter will quickly resolve itself as periods are dropped generally by other legal publishers and by the legal profession.

Canadian commercial legal publishers became active and effective players in the gathering and delivery of Canadian legal information in digital formats.