We are always here to answer questions that come up in your work so that complex legal questions don't get in the way of your ability to serve the children in your care.
Non-lawyers may get answers to legal questions as well if they do not involve complex analysis (which most
legal questions do).
If
your legal question does not fit into any of the areas of practice below, please contact our office.
Not exact matches
Trump's
legal team was initially looking at a number of options to avoid having the president submit to a face - to - face sit down with the special counsel, including providing written responses to
questions and submitting an affidavit saying Trump
did nothing wrong.
(Update 3/8: In follow up
questioning, Fortune asked Mast why the company
did not pursue
legal action against any of the publications, who they claim wrote falsehoods.
There remains a valid
legal question to these licensure fights: Since Square simply processes payment information, and doesn't actually transmit money itself, why should it have to fall under the transmission regulations of all 50 states?
A major
question in that litigation was whether Texas had
legal standing to sue, an issue that the Supreme Court
did not resolve.
The Supreme Court only accepts around 1 % of all appeals, and typically
does so when there's a pressing
legal question or a significant split between appeals courts.
While the judge referred the
question of damages to another hearing, he
did grant Mars Canada $ 225,000 in
legal costs for what he deemed the brazen breach of the earlier settlements and for Ebert's attempts to «avoid accountability» for the misconduct.
The case of an Airbnb guest who overstayed his welcome and now is a
legal tenant raises critical
questions about what the home - rental platform can
do to protect its hosts.
And while there is no
legal requirement that underwriters like Mr. Thiel reveal their involvement to the opposing side or the jury, it is considered fair game for lawyers to ask
questions about financial backing — something that Gawker Media
did on Wednesday in court as part of its efforts to overturn the Hogan judgment.
Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm that
did digital work for Donald Trump's presidential campaign in 2016, is reportedly shutting down after recent ethical and
legal questions about its business practices.
There is also the
question of history and systems of legality — the church has no formal
legal system that can invoke prison sentences (in my experience); the military system
does have a
legal system and the ability to invoke prison terms.
But the metaphor of separation so dominates our
legal thought that one instead turns to the
question: how
does the government avoid «entanglement» with religion?
So, I absolutely
do NOT think Rob's
question about the «spiritual marriage /
legal marriage» heresy is naïve.
There is NO
legal issue here; It's a bad theology issue, and because I
DO N'T subscribe to the religions in
question, I am EXEMPT fom following the the «pray, pay & obey piety - brigade».
«Congress has only faced votes a few times on the complex
legal and moral
questions of whether heinous crimes qualify as genocide — and division is deep about what, if anything, the label mandates the U.S. government to
do.»
Thus, a
question like, «Why
does Tony Jones of the Christian Emerging Movement apparently practice
legal warfare on his ex-spouse?»
The
question is when
do we «grant»
legal «person - hood» to potential humans.
You die and in your Will, that you had made before you passed away, you felt your estate shall go to the community center...
Do you feel that your kid should get any part of your estate, especially after you have stated with out
question in a
legal docu «ment that they get nothing?»
«He
did not let a single
legal question lapse,» said Zhang Peihong, a lawyer who worked with Zhang, according to Chinachange.org.
A Supreme Court ruling today against a Christian campus group that barred students who don't share its views on marriage may have settled a
legal question, but the debate may rage on.
The clandestinely married
did have the same civil - law rights as the licitly married — whatever that happened to entail in a given
legal regime — but that was because the state recognized the capacity of the Church to arbitrate
questions of contracting marriage.
«32 Just as Puritanism had the effect of making every issue a moral
question, so also, as Pound noted,
did every moral
question become a
legal question.33 The notion of «contempt of court,» as found in English and American law, illustrates the point well:
Historians» judgments on these
questions vary, but it seems important to my thesis to maintain that the pressures of pluralism and their impact on
legal institutions
did not wait for the revolution and constitution making.
One more try, to all you fundie nutters that believe a womans right to choose an abortion is equivalent to muder of a child, please answer the
question,,,, What would you
do with / to the 1.2 million women per year that you accuse of the most serious crime of murder for having a
legal abortion?
You still haven't answered my
question — why
does genetics matter to the argument for
legal rights?
In the meantime, if you're a prospective adoptive parent or birth parent and you have a
legal question, don't forget to check out the list of open adoption attorneys on our website.
Fortunately, I have not yet needed the
legal services of HSLDA, but I
do appreciate the fact that they have always been very prompt to respond — with great accuracy — to any and all of my
questions and concerns.
Despite these clear
legal obligations, Palmer said, «Our organizations have received many complaints and
questions from parenting employees and students who
do not know their lactation rights, have faced difficulties when they need to pump milk on the job or during the school day, and
do not know who to turn to within the school community for help.»
Any report on this matter, including the BNI Report, which
does not raise or even answer any of these relevant
legal questions is not worthy of any serious consideration.
Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the
question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having
done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of
Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen&ra
Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing
legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen&ra
legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».
Last item is what I
did remove from my
question and «hope of
legal immigration» is a noticeable reason.
De Blasio dodged the
question about whether he'll have to testify in a Long Island corruption trial that stars one of his big donors, saying: «I'm not a lawyer... What we
did, what my team
did, what I
did was
legal and appropriate.»
But one story, outside of the ETS debacle, more than any other raises
questions about what this shadowy
legal organisation is
doing.
«I believe that we need to put a straightforward and simple and fair and
legal question to the Scottish people in good time, which is to ask the straightforward
question: «
Do you want to stay in the United Kingdom» - and I hope that's what people will vote for - «or do you want to leave the United Kingdom?&raqu
Do you want to stay in the United Kingdom» - and I hope that's what people will vote for - «or
do you want to leave the United Kingdom?&raqu
do you want to leave the United Kingdom?»
He needs to answer a lot of
questions, so don't spend that $ 20 so fst, Schumer may need it for a «
Legal Defense fund», after he spends all his campaign money trying to get re-elected JUST LIKE ALAN HEVESI
DID IN 2006
«The borough president holds himself to the highest ethical and
legal standards, and when you
do that,
questions like these are easy to answer,» DeSio said.
Being forcibly
questioned on oath and without warning or
legal advisors, with no hint of what the
questions related to or whether it was a matter involving them or someone else (maybe a family member or friend), the subject either had to incriminate themself or someone else by telling the truth, be charged with perjury if they lied or other witnesses said differently when
questioned in turn, or be charged with contempt of court if they didn't speak.
Activist Mark Dunlea works with the Campaign For A Real Minimum Wage Increase: «We
do agree his [Cuomo's] idea of trying to
do it just for fast - food workers but particularly only for fast - food workers for certain large companies, 30 franchises,
does raise some
legal questions about his strategy.»
«Although Mr. Walker has
done nothing wrong, securing immunity was without
question the only appropriate
legal procedure to take,» Griffin said.
It's normal for lawyers and others to ask
questions whether the Supreme Court's decisions follow a
legal pattern: that is,
do the Court's decisions conform to
legal precedent, ordinary norms of
legal reasoning, and established constitutional and
legal principles.
In response to the David Cameron's interview for BBC1's Countryfile programme, in which the Prime Minister says: «I always thought the hunting ban was a pretty bizarre piece of legislation, I think there should be a free vote in the House of Commons... My problem has always been that it was just taking the criminal law into an area of activity where it didn't really belong»; Alice Barnard, Chief Executive of the Countryside Alliance, said: «The Prime Minister is totally right to
question the Hunting Act, especially from a
legal basis.
I'm no
legal expert, but despite the reporting in the media, it seems to me that the High Court
did not actually address the
question of retrospectivity.
NYT: People
questioned your
legal and constitutional authority to
do that unilaterally — to delay the employer mandate.
Election law attorneys say the comments don't alter the core
legal question: Whether the October 2016 payment of $ 130,000 to Stephanie Clifford, known as Stormy Daniels in the porn industry, was related primarily to the election that...
Safariland failed to disclose this history on the Vendex forms it submitted to
do business with the city, despite specific
questions on the documents about whether the company had had any recent
legal troubles.
For one, contractors raise the
question of whether the policy is
legal: The 30 percent requirement
does not appear in state law, but is strongly encouraged by Cuomo's Executive Chamber to be put into bids for contracts.
Former Assemblyman Richard Brodsky last week
questioned whether it would even be
legal for the commission to target individual state lawmakers, noting the Moreland Act doesn't specifically allow for that.
He defended his actions and refused to acknowledge that the prosecutors raised serious ethical
questions about his activities, even as they said they
did not have the
legal grounds to accuse anyone of a crime.