Sentences with phrase «legal questions where»

paulg23, the courts won't be asked to resolve a scientific question, they'll be asked to resolve a legal question where scientific evidence carries weight.

Not exact matches

Meanwhile, marijuana remains illegal on the federal level, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions has recently taken steps that would allow federal prosecutors in states where weed is legal to decide whether to prosecute people over marijuana sales in a development that could threaten the burgeoning industry (or, at the very least, spur litigation from some of the states in question looking to keep the federal government from interfering with statewide legislation).

This is where you can get the requisite legal advice necessary via posts that tackle the most asked questions.

«Where it stops along that continuum is in part a policy question, in part a legal question, and in part a political question.

Where appropriate, he invites clients to take a step back from the legal issues in front of them and invites them to ask themselves better questions by using the Osborne - Parnes Creative Problem Solving methodology.

Questions remain though about the legal status of airdropped tokens in an age where anything related to crypto risks being labeled a security.

It is one thing to respond to such a question in societies such as most European societies have been, where Christian establishments are of the legal variety.

«I was asked a question on how the church can stay relevant in the context of gay marriage being legal in the two states of the USA where we have campuses.

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

Questions of interpretation are addressed in subsequent World Health Assembly Resolutions and where additional clarification is required, IBFAN seeks this from UNICEF's legal department.

This means that they are only subject to personal liability for money damages in cases where the meaning of the law with respect to the situation in question is «clearly established» which usually means that it involves a legal issue that has been resolved in a binding case law precedent.

«In an ideal world, these figures would be of interest only to academics and the church itself but in a country where the church in question has a privileged legal and constitutional position, they must be subject to wider public scrutiny and their implications drawn out.

So to answer the question, the only legal recourse Donald Trump would have is to sue on an individual basis, where a court would have to decide whether the particular article was intentionally misleading and libellous.

In response to the David Cameron's interview for BBC1's Countryfile programme, in which the Prime Minister says: «I always thought the hunting ban was a pretty bizarre piece of legislation, I think there should be a free vote in the House of Commons... My problem has always been that it was just taking the criminal law into an area of activity where it didn't really belong»; Alice Barnard, Chief Executive of the Countryside Alliance, said: «The Prime Minister is totally right to question the Hunting Act, especially from a legal basis.

Regardless of whether a potential minimum wage compromise includes or excludes Westchester, it's unlikely to provide any legal clarity on the never - settled question of where the upstate - downstate border lies.

An interesting legal question would be what happens when two circuit courts contradict each other (in which case SCOTUS is where that'd be supposed to be resolved).

«The questions are [often] about basic eligibility for citizenship and where to go if they need help,» explained volunteer Hasan Shafiqullah, an immigration lawyer at the Legal Aid Society.

The big question is where the line is between what's legal — even if it leads to finger - wagging by editorial boards and advocates — and what's criminal.

Throughout the exhibit, these ethical, legal, and social questions are posed to visitors, who will have many opportunities to explore where they stand on these issues.

We saw that most recently in the election of 2000, where the final votes were contested and there was some question about whether Al Gore would bring a legal case to contest the outcome over the vote tally in the state of Florida.

Questions about the legal status of charter schools — which receive taxpayer money but are privately run, usually by nonprofit corporations — are broad, existential ones in Texas, where disputes over school funding are among the Legislature's most contentious.

As part of the Arizona Charter Schools Association's 2016 Legal Week, we are featuring a new podcast titled, «Ask a Lawyer,» where Osborn Maledon attorney Lynne Adams answers questions submitted by charter school leaders.

Jepsen lightly approached the question of where Judge Thomas Moukawsher's broad indictment of public K - 12 education was right or wrong as a matter of policy, but the appeal sharply attacks the judge's legal basis for ruling that shortcomings he identified violate students» rights under the state Constitution to a free and adequate education.

I'm voting to close this question as off - topic because there are very few countries where anything useful in this area would be legal

From 2005 to 2009, Mr. Bradbury headed the Office of Legal Counsel at the U.S. Department of Justice, where he advised the executive branch on a wide range of constitutional and statutory questions, and where he received the Edmund J. Randolph Award and the Secretary of Defense Medal for Outstanding Public Service, among other awards.

Most Americans are unaware of their legal rights and the most frustrating part is not knowing where to find the correct answers to their questions.

Why some policies in question are marked as ineligible while others are eligible can be answered by the issuing company or its legal or tax department, and not on this forum where which particular policies are being discussed is not even specified by the OP.

Remember, these laws allow you to question and initiate a legal investigation of your credit information and repair it where necessary.

After contacting the Canadian Government TFSA via phone, they had trouble answering my question and just referred me to a webpage where it gave me a lot of legal mumbo jumbo verbage that I don't fully understand.

Though the terms of the agreement are confidential, the private settlement between the two parties likely clears the possibility for further legal ambiguity in the Cariou v. Prince case, where the outstanding question of five Prince works was an unresolved thread.

So when an electrified «bike» is roughly the size of a conventional bike, but is throttle operated and not pedaled, yet isn't powerful enough to keep up with faster traffic, it begs the question of just what category to put it in, and where it's legal or illegal to ride it.

This report examines the specific provisions of the Paris Agreement with a view to identifying where legal and policy questions in relation to climate engineering are likely to arise.

IPCC can, however, distinguish between prescriptive and descriptive questions that arise in relevant socio - economic literature about climate policy - making, identify important ethical and justice issues that arise in this literature, where there is a consensus on ethics and justice issues in the relevant literature describe the consensus position, where there is no consensus on ethical and justice issues describe the range of reasonable views on these issues, and identify hard and soft law legal principles relevant to how governments should resolve ethical and justice issues that must be faced by policy - makers.

In its judgment of 26 February 2013, the CJEU responded to the first two questions in the affirmative, and clarified that Article 53 of the Charter only allows national authorities to apply higher standards of protection of fundamental rights where an EU legal act calls for national implementing measures, but not where, as in this case, the EU legal act harmonises the law between the Member States.

2) Question: I am a prostitute in Australia, where my job is legal.

In A v A [2006] EWHC 2900 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) 41 (Jan) Baron J raised the question of whether it may be inappropriate for legal advisers to act again for a party where an agreement is subsequently challenged; and in this I v I Charles J questions whether the wife's lawyers should have acted for her in this case because of a possible conflict.

It became normal to have debates about the boring legal stuff on telegram for example, where more thousand people have eyes on every tricky question.

respond to questions published by others on Twitter seeking help in an area where you have expertise; providing assistance gratis to someone in connection with a simple inquiry may result in paying business down the road as that person confronts more complex legal issues;

The question of when a trial starts, as a trigger for an additional costs payment, has been an issue for some time, coming to the fore under the pre-LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) success fee regime where a higher success fee was payable where a case concluded at trial.

He also revealed that on the company's long - term development wish list is to build an Alexa - like device for law, where you would verbally ask it a legal question and it would audibly give you the answer.

Actually getting to a point where you can apply for asylum will be more difficult than the legal question, and then ensuring that the asylum request is accepted is again a matter that only on the surface is a purely legal question.

Having re-established that the centre of interests is a possible place of jurisdiction, without addressing the other potential places of jurisdiction (namely the domicile of the defendant and all other Member States where the infringing material was accessible — admittedly, this was not the subject of the preliminary reference), the Court addresses the question of where the centre of interest of a legal person is located.

Daniel Lublin was interviewed for CTV's Canada AM program «Ask the Lawyer» where he answered questions regarding the legal issues in the workplace.

The question before the Court was whether, once the UK has chosen to provide legal assistance in cases where it may be under no duty to do so, could it refuse such assistance to those who otherwise qualify save for the residence test?

In addition, we often provide ongoing advice to government entities during the process, including addressing questions of compliance, assisting to answer request for information process on legal and risk matters and concerns relating to the evaluation process, and assisting with negotiations where the procurement documents permit.

The matter then came before the Supreme Court of Canada, which was asked to address an important legal question: in cases where the support terms of an agreement have been incorporated into a court order, what is the proper approach by a court to an application to vary?

However, the «reasonableness standard» is to be applied to decisions which involve questions of fact, discretion and policy, as well as questions where the legal issues can not be easily separated from the factual ones.

Still, the common question we hear from law firms, legal operations, and legal departments is: «Where do we begin?»

Well, tell our listeners where they can either contact you if they have any questions, if they have a legal need or your website and all that good stuff.

The crucial question at the heart of this particular case was whether, following Mr Kernott's departure from 39 Badger Hall Avenue, an intention between the parties could be found which would rebut the presumption of joint beneficial ownership (which presumption generally arises where there is joint legal ownership and no express declaration of trust that the co-owners should own in anything other than equal shares).