Sentences with phrase «legal reasons regarding»

I think for legal reasons regarding interitance and SS, it will never come to pass.

Not exact matches

The reason is that whether the lawyer works for a business or runs one, questions arise regarding the intersection of, and perhaps conflict between, legal ethics on one hand and business ethics on the other.

What availed as the common wisdom of mankind until the day before yesterday — for example, that man, woman, mother, and father name natural realities as well as social roles, that children issue naturally from their union, that the marital union of man and woman is the foundation of human society and provides the optimal home for the flourishing of children — all this is now regarded by many as obsolete and even hopelessly bigoted, as court after court, demonstrating that this revolution has profoundly transformed even the meaning of reason itself, has declared that this bygone wisdom now fails even to pass the minimum legal threshold of rational cogency.

Here's another, scarcely less oratorical in character, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: the title of this document (another wonderful example of Vatican bogus academic language when what is needed is a competent journalist used to writing informative headlines) is «Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons» (2003): The Church's teaching on marriage and on the complementarity of the sexes reiterates a truth that is evident to right reason and recognised as such by all the major cultures of the world.

The letter read in part, «I would like to share with you serious concern regarding the reasons that motivated this decision, notably the repeated failure of the FIU Nigeria to address concerns regarding the protection of confidential information as well as concerns about the legal basis and the FIU's independence vis - à - vis the Nigerian Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

The following post discusses whether the judgment delivered by the Grand Chamber of the Court in this case has been successful in finally bringing the above - mentioned dispute to an end, and it also provides a closer look on the Court's reasoning as regards the choice of legal basis in relation to the measures implementing association agreements.

One reason for this is simply the accessibility clients have to information regarding the true cost and nature of legal services as well as alternative options for achieving the same legal options at a more cost - effective rate.

Last but not least, the same reasoning must prevail regarding the fact that HTSs are producing «legal effects in the internal market» (see para. 62 of the AG Opinion): National bodies, either public or private, adopting (voluntary or compulsory) acts with legal effects in the internal market can not be considered EU bodies within the meaning of Article 267 TFEU.

In regards to legal liability, if a freelancer operates as an individual and is sued for some reason, the freelancer's personal assets are on the line.

Within legal circles, support for the reasoning in Greymac persists, even as the law regarding solicitor - client privilege has evolved.

When we first launched the Cyberjustice Laboratory project, back in 2010, we submitted the hypothesis that the reason the legal system had not embraced technology had nothing to do with the availability of technological solutions to our problems, nor was this caused by legal intransigence since laws can always be changed (as was the case in Quebec back in 2001 regarding signatures).

For this reason, people who think that they may have a wrongful death claim should always speak with an experienced lawyer before accepting a settlement offer or taking any other legal action with regard to their claim.

The Lawyer unceremoniously ejected Slaughters from its definition of the Magic Circle for perfectly logical reasons, but instinctively, emotionally, I think the legal market continues to regard this bluest of blue chip firms as part of the charmed five, and I think it's the one which will endure.

And many of us in the legal profession, for many somewhat contradictory reasons, will get a little squeamish regarding major changes to juries (or restricting freedom of speech for the insurer), even if it ends up costing the tax - payer.

Don't put too much stock in the outcome in Quebec unless the final outcome is based upon pure human - based common - sense and rational reasoning based upon today's realities, and not upon some dictator's ideas (efficient and seemingly workable in their day as they were determined to be by their followers, and current supporters) that were not agreed upon by the masses, but were forced upon them to be adopted and espoused by the same, or else; no wonder they have held sway for so long... there is a very strong element of treasonous thinking directed toward any «outsider type thinking» regarding this hallowed legal code.

For this reason, and because of the seller's obligation to disclose latent defects, it is strongly recommended that you seek legal advice if you have any questions regarding your obligation to disclose and whether to provide an amended form.