Vendors like Casetext and Jurify have taken steps to incorporate social content within
legal research results, replacing the work of dedicated taxonomists and curators of the LexisNexis and Westlaw databases.
3 Geeks and A Law Blog have reviewed it in comparison with Wolfram - Alpha giving G2 good grade for
legal research results.
For it is primarily through analyzing
legal research results (e.g., case precedents) and applying them to the facts of particular disputes that lawyers are able to forecast the likely outcome of those disputes.
In the article, the author discusses changes that may be expected in
legal research resulting from the shift in legal research from print based case research to electronic sources.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and
research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of
legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may
result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
«We believe if JPM can successfully resolve its regulatory and
legal headline risk in a timely manner, the stock could reverse its recent underperformance that has
resulted in trading at a below - peer forward (price to earnings ratio) of 8.8 times despite our expectations of above - average profitability in 2014,» Matthew Burnell, an analyst at Wells Fargo Securities, wrote in a
research note Thursday following the fine.
The Jané Crash Test
Research Centre was built in 2003 when, as a
result of our commitment to child safety, we decided to create our own crash test tunnel where we could test our seats to the limit to achieve a level of safety that goes beyond the
legal requirements.
Instead,
research suggests the more prosaic, but costly, exercise of registration teams visiting households where electors have not registered would produce better
results, especially if backed by a reminder of the existing
legal requirement to register.
Both books also tackle the
resulting shift in ethical, aspirational, and
legal landscapes in biomedical
research as molecular scientists rushed to form industrial ties, universities accelerated patenting and licensing activities, and entrepreneurs created biotechnology companies.
The effort is part of a much broader debate that spans
research and clinical care over which genetic
results should be returned — an ethical,
legal, and practical minefield.
The Ethical,
Legal and Social Implications
Research Program at the U.S. National Human Genome Research Institute is now accepting applications for more than $ 7.5 million in studies on how to share genetic results with research parti
Research Program at the U.S. National Human Genome
Research Institute is now accepting applications for more than $ 7.5 million in studies on how to share genetic results with research parti
Research Institute is now accepting applications for more than $ 7.5 million in studies on how to share genetic
results with
research parti
research participants.
In 2003, in «A vision for the future of genomics
research,» Francis Collins — who was then the director of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), part of the National Institutes of Health — and his co-authors encouraged collaboration between basic scientists and clinical scientists, and between life scientists and social scientists, to address the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic and genetic research and the resulting new techn
research,» Francis Collins — who was then the director of the National Human Genome
Research Institute (NHGRI), part of the National Institutes of Health — and his co-authors encouraged collaboration between basic scientists and clinical scientists, and between life scientists and social scientists, to address the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic and genetic research and the resulting new techn
Research Institute (NHGRI), part of the National Institutes of Health — and his co-authors encouraged collaboration between basic scientists and clinical scientists, and between life scientists and social scientists, to address the ethical,
legal, and social implications of genomic and genetic
research and the resulting new techn
research and the
resulting new technologies.
This is the
result of
research by
Legal scholars Piet Hein van Kempen and Masha Fedorova of Radboud University in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
His
research in health policy has focused on the ethical,
legal and social issues related to genetics and race, and especially on the ways that race and socio - economic status
result in health disparities among different communities.
This has
resulted in the current
legal imbroglio, which has had a negative impact not only on the Foundation and its activities, but more generally on
research activities at the Station.
As a
result, the law provides greater
legal protection to those animals then say, animals raised for food, fur, entertainment or
research.
The project by artists Michal Baror and Patrick Hough, is the
result of two months residency in Tel Aviv in which they
researched the intersection of archeology and politics in the region of Israel / Palestine — specifically, the antiques trade in Israel, which is one of the countires in the Middle East where the antiques trade is
legal.
Malcolm is being targeted by a
legal nonprofit organization that doesn't like the
results of his
research.
Fresh on the heels of Casetext's
legal research assistant CARA being named new product of the year, Casetext is today introducing an expansion of CARA that adds briefs to its suggested
results.
Low - Cost
Legal Research = Low - Value
Results.
«These findings indicate clear advantages
resulting from the addition of the ROSS tool to electronic
legal research involving traditional tools,» the report concludes.
Even when thorough
research is done, the
resulting legal opinion is often hedged and necessarily limited to a specific set of facts and a particular context.
And of course, we can render law review article
results in the Interactive Timeline, our first - of - its - kind data visualization tool for
legal research.»
But it is the other two updates that I want to focus on, because, in combination, they dramatically enhance the
results you receive when performing
legal research.
As a
result, it now provides much more than
legal research support for lawyers in private practice who do
legal aid cases.
LexisNexis has released the
results of its recent Attorney
Research Selection Survey by The
Research Intelligence Group (TRIG), and provides some interesting information on the outcomes of consumers» online
legal searches.
Second, CARA is now integrated into Casetext's standard
legal research workflow, so that it can be used to enhance keyword queries and deliver
results that are far - better matched to the facts and issues at hand.
The
result of extensive consultation and
research, the report offered a considered assessment of issues and challenges facing the
legal profession, and made recommendations for changes to the regulation and education of Canadian lawyers.
The CBA's
Legal Futures Initiative launched last summer and has been in a
research and information gathering phase since that time, with the
results trickling out now, and to be fully released next month.
As a
result, the centralized
legal research unit LAO LAW, at Legal Aid Ontario (LAO), is a true support service, but CanLII is
legal research unit LAO LAW, at
Legal Aid Ontario (LAO), is a true support service, but CanLII is
Legal Aid Ontario (LAO), is a true support service, but CanLII is not.
Automatic preparation of short summaries and classification will help to improve
legal research processes by facilitating the drilling down of search
results will keep usage costs down.
As a
result, many
legal research paradigms can feel like proverbial «square pegs.»
The Coalition of Technology Resources for Lawyers (CTRL), an open source community for
legal practitioners, today released the
results from its annual Advanced Analytics
Research, revealing an uptick in analytics usage by in - house
legal departments.
Maryland's curriculum underwent an extensive review in 1999 — 2000, and significant changes to the writing program came about in the
resulting curricular reform of 2000.19 The new curriculum increased the number of credits devoted to required
legal writing and
research classes, particularly in the first semester.
While
legal research platforms are becoming increasingly easy to use, they are simultaneously making it more difficult for novice researchers to understand and analyze the
results that they provide.31 Thus
legal research teaching should leave the method and means of information gathering to the researcher, focusing instead on the foundational knowledge necessary to accurately categorize the information and assess its completeness.
The
result is a unique and proprietary integration of a series of software systems in project management, client intake, client communication and document management, trademark management and infringement tracking, and
legal / business and brand
research.
Performing good
legal research in this way will provide you with the foundation you need to proceed confidently and achieve the best
result for your client.
Like the fabled artefact, delving into complex
legal research, especially on issues of reform can often lead to unexpected and difficult
results - or lead one down a rabbit hole of questions - but instead of shying away from these challenges, the Women and the Law Society saw Pandora's Box as a means of celebrating the inquisitive and critical nature of the
legal mind.
Firstpoint saves you time with point - of - law case digest written by our
legal team which offers automated reports, and delivers precise and relevant
research results.
The data from Forrester
Research shows that
legal marketing is largely turning to the Internet to get
results.
Effective
legal research, however, requires us to understand search
results more deeply.
Read it here:
Legal Research Services Vary Widely in
Results, Study Finds.
Sam Glover: You know, ROSS, obviously, pioneered the AI assisted
legal research I think, and ROSS is a Canadian company that is using IBM's Watson to deliver better search
results.
Turns out, the
results they deliver vary widely — not just between Westlaw and Lexis Advance, but among several
legal research platforms.
I write about some emerging innovators in this area, such as Ravel, a
legal research site that presents search results visually, and Stanford's Program for Legal Technology and Design, which is using design principles to build better tools for delivering and educating about the
legal research site that presents search
results visually, and Stanford's Program for
Legal Technology and Design, which is using design principles to build better tools for delivering and educating about the
Legal Technology and Design, which is using design principles to build better tools for delivering and educating about the law.
Ravel is distinct from traditional
legal research platforms in its use of visualization to map out search
results.
For lawyers, Clusty's ability to help hone in on relevant
results makes it a useful tool for
legal and factual
research.
As a
result of that dialogue, the Canadian Abridgment gained a new lease on life and ensured its continuing role in the
legal research market.
Part II describes that
research and presents its
results, which support our hypothesis that international and comparative law are becoming a routine component of
legal practice.
As it pertains to
legal research this begs the question: When you run a search and get a giant
results set back, how often do you use all the documents you pulled?