Some law schools offer a robust curriculum of «
legal service delivery innovation and technology» courses supplemented by «law and [technology]» courses.
A pilot project in the U.S. is creating an index of
legal service delivery innovation.
In early 2015, Linna started what is now a 38 - school «law school innovation index» to measure the extent to which law schools have incorporated
legal service delivery innovation and technology disciplines into their curriculum.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production,
delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and
services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and
innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in
delivery of materials and
services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of
legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
Risks and uncertainties include without limitation the effect of competitive and economic factors, and the Company's reaction to those factors, on consumer and business buying decisions with respect to the Company's products; continued competitive pressures in the marketplace; the ability of the Company to deliver to the marketplace and stimulate customer demand for new programs, products, and technological
innovations on a timely basis; the effect that product introductions and transitions, changes in product pricing or mix, and / or increases in component costs could have on the Company's gross margin; the inventory risk associated with the Company's need to order or commit to order product components in advance of customer orders; the continued availability on acceptable terms, or at all, of certain components and
services essential to the Company's business currently obtained by the Company from sole or limited sources; the effect that the Company's dependency on manufacturing and logistics
services provided by third parties may have on the quality, quantity or cost of products manufactured or
services rendered; risks associated with the Company's international operations; the Company's reliance on third - party intellectual property and digital content; the potential impact of a finding that the Company has infringed on the intellectual property rights of others; the Company's dependency on the performance of distributors, carriers and other resellers of the Company's products; the effect that product and
service quality problems could have on the Company's sales and operating profits; the continued
service and availability of key executives and employees; war, terrorism, public health issues, natural disasters, and other circumstances that could disrupt supply,
delivery, or demand of products; and unfavorable results of other
legal proceedings.
I definitely feel a caveat regarding «
innovation in future virtual
delivery models» is warranted and that is, it should not harm the client's rights to be fairly and justly heard in any jurisdiction recognizing web - based or other hybrid
legal services.
Once every law office is wired for superfast Internet, there will be new opportunities for cloud - based
innovations that can drive greater efficiencies in the practice of law and greater effectiveness in the
delivery of
legal services.
Dentons developed Nextlaw Labs in 2015 to spur
innovation and technological change and incubate ideas for new products and processes to transform
legal services delivery.
All of that said, it is this very gap that is driving
innovation in the
delivery of
legal services.
The potential for ABSs to improve access to justice lies in the likelihood that the new forms of financing and management expertise that they can attract will spur efficiencies and
innovations in the design and
delivery of
legal services (and «products»).
As Moore further notes «Osler also recommended that
legal aid be transferred entirely from the Law Society to a publicly appointed board which might be more open than the lawyers to other
innovations in
delivery of
legal services».
Says Linna, «Where law schools really have and have had an
innovation deficit since the beginning of time is thinking about how we can improve the
delivery of
legal services; not working in the business as lawyers, but working on our business.
The ReInvent Law Laboratory was created by MSU Law professors Daniel Martin Katz and Renee Newman Knake in early 2012 with a goal of incorporating the
innovation of law, technology, design, and
delivery into the
legal services industry.
Students work on researching
legal innovation through
legal project management, technology, and other
legal service delivery methodologies.
At Hogan Lovells, Stephen is responsible for delivering quality, efficiency and
innovation to
Legal Service Delivery, globally.
But a good IT team can provide the knowledge and tools to help firms break out — delivering operational agility across global offices, better and more secure information sharing, and real
innovation in the processes behind
legal service delivery.
In 2010, Richard received a Louis M. Brown Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Bar Association in recognition of his
innovations in the
delivery of legal services, 2013 - Named a FastCase50 Winner 2013 - ABA James I Keane Memorial Award for Excellence in the Delivery of Legal S
delivery of
legal services, 2013 - Named a FastCase50 Winner 2013 - ABA James I Keane Memorial Award for Excellence in the Delivery of Legal Serv
legal services, 2013 - Named a FastCase50 Winner 2013 - ABA James I Keane Memorial Award for Excellence in the Delivery of Legal S
services, 2013 - Named a FastCase50 Winner 2013 - ABA James I Keane Memorial Award for Excellence in the
Delivery of Legal S
Delivery of
Legal Serv
Legal ServicesServices.
Our focus is on implementing changes in the way we regulate, with a view to easing the regulatory burden and encouraging
innovation in the
delivery of
legal services.»
As Ryan McClead points out at 3 Geeks and a Law Blog, «We know what the next great
innovations in
legal service delivery are, even if we don't know exactly how they are going to work or what they are going to look like.»
Thankfully several of the advancements are multidisciplinary with a strong emphasis on
innovation in
delivery of
legal services through entrepreneurship.
Whereas that index was created to catalog and measure law firm
innovation in the
delivery of
legal services, this new index sets its sights on law schools.
This is just one of the key findings in the 2017 - 18 report, which asked 810 GCs and in - house lawyers across the globe to rate the importance of, and their satisfaction with, their chosen external counsel's performance on categories including billing practice,
innovation, quality of
service delivery, communication / responsiveness, level of teamwork and quality of
legal advice.
Further thought — a logical question raised by all the foregoing, of course, is why haven't clients risen up and demanded
innovation in
legal services delivery?
«We distinguish between the study of
legal -
service delivery innovation and technology (i.e.,
innovation and technology applied to improve
legal -
service delivery), on the one hand, and the study of law where it intersects with technology (i.e., law applied to technology, what we call «law and [technology]» courses), on the other hand.»
Differentiate between programs and courses focused on «
legal -
service delivery innovation and technology» and those focused on the intersection of law and technology (e.g., «law and [technology] courses»).
«While 26 percent of the 2004 entries received were in the «Client
Service Virtuosos» category, intended to distinguish firms demonstrating innovation in client service or delivery of legal services, the judges determined that none of the entries attained the level of innovation required for the award.
Service Virtuosos» category, intended to distinguish firms demonstrating
innovation in client
service or delivery of legal services, the judges determined that none of the entries attained the level of innovation required for the award.
service or
delivery of
legal services, the judges determined that none of the entries attained the level of
innovation required for the award.»
Their needs for work flexibility and teamwork, technological competency, strong communication skills and sense of global responsibility, will help create the new models of
legal service delivery and transformative
innovation.
There are a variety of ways in which
legal aid administrations can inspire or deploy
innovation in the
delivery of their own
services, for example:
Recommendation 2: Courts should consider regulatory
innovations in the area of
legal services delivery.
Though their missions vary, the majority of incubators embrace the importance of
innovation and technology in the
legal field and focus on the
delivery of
legal services to the un - and under - represented.
The CBAFutureschat is a warm - up event for a CBA
Legal Conference panel on Aug. 15 titled All About Legal Innovations, where speakers Blase and McFarlane will share innovations in legal service delivery around the world, and invite participants to do their own blue - sky thinking about innovations in the Canadian legal marketp
Legal Conference panel on Aug. 15 titled All About
Legal Innovations, where speakers Blase and McFarlane will share innovations in legal service delivery around the world, and invite participants to do their own blue - sky thinking about innovations in the Canadian legal marketp
Legal Innovations, where speakers Blase and McFarlane will share innovations in legal service delivery around the world, and invite participants to do their own blue - sky thinking about innovations in the Canadian legal m
Innovations, where speakers Blase and McFarlane will share
innovations in legal service delivery around the world, and invite participants to do their own blue - sky thinking about innovations in the Canadian legal m
innovations in
legal service delivery around the world, and invite participants to do their own blue - sky thinking about innovations in the Canadian legal marketp
legal service delivery around the world, and invite participants to do their own blue - sky thinking about
innovations in the Canadian legal m
innovations in the Canadian
legal marketp
legal marketplace.
«The work of Lindy Frolich and the Colorado OADC embodies the purpose of the Keane Award — recognizing
innovation through use of technology in the
delivery legal services,» said Chad Burton, chair of the ABA Law Practice Futures Initiative.
Due to limitations in the law firm business model and constraints imposed by the ABA ethical rules, there is currently very little
innovation taking place in the
delivery of
legal services.
The case for
innovation in
delivery of
legal services is crystal clear.
During 2013, one of the most vocal advocates for
innovations in
legal technology to facilitate the delivery of legal services was Legal Services Corporation President Jim San
legal technology to facilitate the
delivery of
legal services was Legal Services Corporation President Jim San
legal services was Legal Services Corporation President Jim
services was
Legal Services Corporation President Jim San
Legal Services Corporation President Jim
Services Corporation President Jim Sandman.
Their bold move has received both kudos and slings and arrows from members of the
legal profession, but they are putting their money where their mouths are in terms of
innovation of
legal service delivery and access to justice.
Last week, Linna unveiled the fruits of his labor, the
Legal Services Innovation Index, a project to create an index of innovation in the delivery of legal serv
Legal Services Innovation Index, a project to create an index of innovation in the delivery of legal s
Services Innovation Index, a project to create an index of
innovation in the
delivery of
legal serv
legal servicesservices.
The College of Law Practice Management is seeking nominations for its annual InnovAction Awards, which honor
innovations in law practice management and the
delivery of
legal services.
Known for
innovation in its
delivery model, it describes itself as a provider of «tech - enabled»
legal services.
The purpose of this is to catalog «concrete examples of law firms offering products,
legal services, or consulting
services that constitute improvements in
legal -
service delivery or foster
legal -
service delivery innovations.»
As these Initiatives unfold, we are increasingly convinced of the interplay between the two: that opportunities, transformations, and cultural shifts engendered by
innovation can be leveraged towards positive changes in access to justice, and conversely, that access to justice can grow through, amongst other things, a reinvention of the
delivery of
legal services.
Earlier this year Simon Chester told us about the InnovAction Awards «for excellence and
innovation in the management and
delivery of
legal services,» sponsored by the College of Law Practice Management.
Andy Daws, Riverview's vice-president North America, says the 2007
Legal Services Act, which was designed to promote competition, innovation and the public and consumer interest, has made the U.K. «the world's legal laboratory right now,» where experiments in ownership structure, service delivery, and alternative business models are being carried out, with varying degrees of suc
Legal Services Act, which was designed to promote competition,
innovation and the public and consumer interest, has made the U.K. «the world's
legal laboratory right now,» where experiments in ownership structure, service delivery, and alternative business models are being carried out, with varying degrees of suc
legal laboratory right now,» where experiments in ownership structure,
service delivery, and alternative business models are being carried out, with varying degrees of success.
But as the rate of
innovation continues to accelerate, technology will play a larger and larger role in all aspects of the
delivery of
legal services.
While very little has been said so far about exactly what swung it for LexisNexis, the award recognises the contribution suppliers make to improving the
delivery of
legal services, and the judges were looking for «expertise and professionalism;
innovation; value for money; customer care and satisfaction; and measurable success.»
As the global demand for lower cost and efficient
legal services grows, we will see new
innovations in the
delivery of these
services.
A targeted cluster of grants is awarded through the Foundation's Special Initiative to strengthen core elements of the national
legal aid infrastructure, including
innovations for better and more effective
service delivery.
Suffolk University Law School: Institute on Law Practice Technology and Innovation Suffolk's Institute on Law Practice Technology and Innovation oversees projects and programs designed to leverage technology and other
innovations to improve the practice of law and the
delivery of
legal services.
At Hogan Lovells, Stephen is charged with delivering quality, efficiency, and
innovation to
Legal Service Delivery, globally.
Two law firms and a company that supports e-discovery have been recognized for their
innovation and excellence in the management and
delivery of
legal services: