Sentences with phrase «legal services are paid for»

Although targeted legal services are paid for by the client, there is no effort by law societies to make the whole legal service affordable.

Not exact matches

The Bets are also being told to be self - sufficient administratively: They can rely on Alphabet for functions like legal counsel, human resources, and public relations, but only if they pay Alphabet for the services.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
The results of Uber's legal battle could reshape the sharing economy, which is built around Internet companies that serve as marketplaces matching people who provide a service with others looking to pay for it.
In any otherwalk of life, whether buying goods, services, booking a holiday, going to a theatre / play and even when using utilities like internet, electric, gas, phone, etc. etc. we have LEGAL rights when we are cheated out of the service we pay for (and we pay through the nose to attend the Emirates!).
He has been criticized most recently for vetoing a bill in December, which passed the Legislature unanimously in June, to have the state pay for the costs of mandated legal services counties must provide for poor people accused of crimes.
Legal Services Corp. grant funding has been cut from almost $ 379 million two years ago to $ 316 million currently, and those grants now pay less than 27 percent of the funding for New York's nonprofit legal aid programs, DiNapoli Legal Services Corp. grant funding has been cut from almost $ 379 million two years ago to $ 316 million currently, and those grants now pay less than 27 percent of the funding for New York's nonprofit legal aid programs, DiNapoli legal aid programs, DiNapoli said.
What's different about the arrangement is that Cuomo is using the campaign money to pay for the legal services for the entire office of the governor.
Christopher D. Lamb, Executive Director for MFY Legal Services, Inc., said: «This legislation underscores that the failure to pay wages that are earned is nothing more or less than theft and finally provides civil and criminal penalties that recognize this reality.»
Mario Vrendenburg, also known as Antonia Barrone, and his New York State Prisoner Assistance Center or New York Parole Aids will have to pay $ 23,427 to its inmate clients for legal services that it was unqualified and unlicensed to perform.
Unless the parent can afford to pay for private school tuition or to move to a different school district, the student is forced to settle for a sub-par education or take legal action against the district to fight for appropriate educational services.
By extending school districts» obligation to pay for private school placements until all appeals are exhausted, the decision creates an incentive for parents to prolong litigation rather than to work collaboratively with school districts to resolve disputes without delay; the increased liability for private tuition and legal fees from needlessly prolonged litigation imposes an untenable burden on the already - strained budgets of local school districts and diverts resources away from providing educational services to all children.
Thus, you pay for truly professional essay service which is customized, confidential, legal, and reliable!
Many of them are designed for people in public service, such as New York's District Attorney and Indigent Legal Services Attorney program, which offers loan repayment of up to $ 20,400 to help attorneys employed in that state pay back their law school debt.
You may also be required to pay for other legal services relating to your loan which are provided to the lender.
In some cases, you might be able to deduct legal bills as long as you paid for services that net you taxable income.
You may be required to pay for related legal services provided to the lender.
My mother is the legal surviving spouse of my dad and gets a paltry amount from dad's pension, while most of it is used to pay for nursing home services.
Most funds with share classes from A to R5 can have some element of revenue - sharing, where fees can be taken from investments to pay commissions for the services of third - party providers — some of which may not have a fiduciary responsibility or legal obligation to act in the participants» best interests.
Your ongoing service agreement is a legal contract that should set out what you will or will not receive for the fees you are paying.
The lower the Loan - to - Value ratio the better because it gives some protection against the risk of a decline in property or home values (prices) which can adversely affect the MIE if it has to pay for expenses associated to selling the property that has been used as collateral such as legal fees, realtor commissionsCommissions What you pay to a broker or agent for their services.
The only way a attorney referral service can receive compensation is a flat fee per a lead, no matter if it produces legal fees or not for the attorney and the amount paid can not be in direct relation to the amount of legal fees collected.
If you talk to a lawyer and your lawyer says not to do anything, don't pay back your loans «get your lawyer to put that in writing for you»!!!! There is a legal opinion from Charles Rotenberg stating that these are real loans and they need to be serviced.
Under the Investment Management Agreements, the Manager is responsible for paying all of the Funds» expenses including expenses for the following services: transfer agency, fund accounting, fund administration, custody, legal, audit, compliance, directors» fees, call center, fulfillment, travel, insurance, rent, printing, postage, and other office supplies, except for commissions, brokerage fees, and other transaction costs, taxes, interest, litigation expenses, and related expenses, and other extraordinary expenses.
Chris Kesterson and the workers at Debt Settlement America, if you truly want to help the people in these three examples, please pay for them to go bankrupt, give them a legal fresh start and leave them in a safer place than where they are right now, struggling to save money for your monthly services fees, that you will continue to charge them, and to pay you a big percentage of their debts as a settlement fee.
These are «self - assessments,» meaning the businesses agreed, through a legal mechanism, to assess themselves to pay for certain services that would benefit their businesses.
North Carolina quickly put the kibosh on plans for advertising legal services on Groupon, stating in a proposed ethics opinion that the site's fee «is a percentage of the amount actually paid to the lawyer and appears to constitute revenue sharing with a nonlawyer.»
I was puzzled when I recently watched an ad for Pay - Day - Loan (or the like) that in the disclaimer specifically mentioned that they didn't provide their service in New York due to legal limits on interest rates.
Who is to pay for these legal services?
Generally, a contract attorney is employed by a legal services agency to work on large - scale projects for an hourly wage paid by the agency.
Lawyers should consider unbundling or limited scope retainers as there are opportunities to help large numbers of clients who can pay for help on a part of their matter (visit practicepro.ca / limitedscope) for tools and resources to help you provide limited scope services), but unbundled services can only chip away at part of the unmet legal needs problem.
Today, it is the client that decides the price that will be paid for legal services.
For many years, the profession has been talking about alternative billing schemes such as flat fees, unbundled legal services, and pay - what - it's - worth options.
Access problems in our country are well - documented but when even medium - to - high income people are avoiding lawyers the problem is clearly larger than legal services for those who can't pay for them.
The new comment says it's OK to pay for «lead generation» services, provided the generator doesn't vouch for the lawyer's credentials or abilities, or create the impression that it has chosen the lawyer by analyzing the potential client's legal problems, or pretend that the recommendation is being made gratis.
http://www.slaw.ca/2016/08/09/a2j-unaffordable-legal-services-concepts-and-solutions/ We must change law societies» management structure substantially, or get rid of them, or go on serving out the rest of our careers in a very seriously depressed profession — a profession that is rapidly losing its size, power, purpose, and prestige to, inter alia, the commercial world of LegalX and LegalZoom, and to law society - sponsored «alternative legal services,» which are charity instead of affordable lawyers provided in exchange for that majority's paying for the justice system whereat benchers earn a very good living.
How did they know that otherwise self - represented litigants would pay for the services of a limited license legal technician when they were not willing to pay for the services of an attorney?
To establish an attorney / client relationship, individuals and organizations will be required to sign an Agreement for Legal Services and pay applicable fees.
Clients will be paying more, not less, for top legal services, with a combination of factors — bank pressure, the «IBM factor» and simple need for expertise — creating what amounts to a complex cartel among the large firms.
Is the only legitimate use of an alternative structure to provide free legal services to those who can not pay for them at all?
It is different from its competitors in the personal injury legal services market in two manners: (i) it does not deduct fees from its clients» compensation awards (instead Aspire Law's fees are paid solely by the insurer that recorded the accident), and (ii) half of the profits earned by Aspire Law are paid to Aspire, the charity, which uses it to provide support, funding and housing for persons with spinal cord injuries.
We appreciate that legal expertise can be needed for big and small commercial projects or personal life changes, which is why we offer tailored packages or pay - as - you - go services that boast affordable fees.
The second level of response to the argument is this: alternative structures offer the means to provide free legal services to those who can not pay for them at all.
Or is the only legitimate use of an alternative structure to provide free legal services to those who can not pay for them at all?
Some argue that alternative structures can be used only to provide legal services for payment — that they are of no use for providing free legal services to clients who are unable to pay.
This population includes people who are so poor that they can not afford to pay anything for legal services, but it also includes the middle class, as well as start - ups and small and medium - sized businesses.
Yet buyers of legal services are becoming more sophisticated, and less willing to pay for inefficient processes that translate into higher fees.
When this situation is declared unconstitutional, that will provide the basis for making law societies pay for the legal services that people can not afford (except for Legal Aid's very limited availabillegal services that people can not afford (except for Legal Aid's very limited availabilLegal Aid's very limited availability).
Other legal services require customers to pay by the hour and take time out of their days for a call — Micro is the first to charge a flat rate per question that can be asked and answered online.
We're also thrilled to be a North Star Lawyer — an award presented by the Minnesota State Bar Association to lawyers who provide over 50 hours of pro bono legal services to those who can not afford to pay a lawyer for legal help.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z