Although targeted
legal services are paid for by the client, there is no effort by law societies to make the whole legal service affordable.
Not exact matches
The Bets
are also
being told to
be self - sufficient administratively: They can rely on Alphabet
for functions like
legal counsel, human resources, and public relations, but only if they
pay Alphabet
for the
services.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and
services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities
for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to
be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may
be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and
services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of
legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which
is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to
pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies
being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement
is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to
be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may
be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
The results of Uber's
legal battle could reshape the sharing economy, which
is built around Internet companies that serve as marketplaces matching people who provide a
service with others looking to
pay for it.
In any otherwalk of life, whether buying goods,
services, booking a holiday, going to a theatre / play and even when using utilities like internet, electric, gas, phone, etc. etc. we have
LEGAL rights when we
are cheated out of the
service we
pay for (and we
pay through the nose to attend the Emirates!).
He has
been criticized most recently
for vetoing a bill in December, which passed the Legislature unanimously in June, to have the state
pay for the costs of mandated
legal services counties must provide
for poor people accused of crimes.
Legal Services Corp. grant funding has been cut from almost $ 379 million two years ago to $ 316 million currently, and those grants now pay less than 27 percent of the funding for New York's nonprofit legal aid programs, DiNapoli
Legal Services Corp. grant funding has
been cut from almost $ 379 million two years ago to $ 316 million currently, and those grants now
pay less than 27 percent of the funding
for New York's nonprofit
legal aid programs, DiNapoli
legal aid programs, DiNapoli said.
What
's different about the arrangement
is that Cuomo
is using the campaign money to
pay for the
legal services for the entire office of the governor.
Christopher D. Lamb, Executive Director
for MFY
Legal Services, Inc., said: «This legislation underscores that the failure to
pay wages that
are earned
is nothing more or less than theft and finally provides civil and criminal penalties that recognize this reality.»
Mario Vrendenburg, also known as Antonia Barrone, and his New York State Prisoner Assistance Center or New York Parole Aids will have to
pay $ 23,427 to its inmate clients
for legal services that it
was unqualified and unlicensed to perform.
Unless the parent can afford to
pay for private school tuition or to move to a different school district, the student
is forced to settle
for a sub-par education or take
legal action against the district to fight
for appropriate educational
services.
By extending school districts» obligation to
pay for private school placements until all appeals
are exhausted, the decision creates an incentive
for parents to prolong litigation rather than to work collaboratively with school districts to resolve disputes without delay; the increased liability
for private tuition and
legal fees from needlessly prolonged litigation imposes an untenable burden on the already - strained budgets of local school districts and diverts resources away from providing educational
services to all children.
Thus, you
pay for truly professional essay
service which
is customized, confidential,
legal, and reliable!
Many of them
are designed
for people in public
service, such as New York's District Attorney and Indigent
Legal Services Attorney program, which offers loan repayment of up to $ 20,400 to help attorneys employed in that state
pay back their law school debt.
You may also
be required to
pay for other
legal services relating to your loan which
are provided to the lender.
In some cases, you might
be able to deduct
legal bills as long as you
paid for services that net you taxable income.
You may
be required to
pay for related
legal services provided to the lender.
My mother
is the
legal surviving spouse of my dad and gets a paltry amount from dad's pension, while most of it
is used to
pay for nursing home
services.
Most funds with share classes from A to R5 can have some element of revenue - sharing, where fees can
be taken from investments to
pay commissions
for the
services of third - party providers — some of which may not have a fiduciary responsibility or
legal obligation to act in the participants» best interests.
Your ongoing
service agreement
is a
legal contract that should set out what you will or will not receive
for the fees you
are paying.
The lower the Loan - to - Value ratio the better because it gives some protection against the risk of a decline in property or home values (prices) which can adversely affect the MIE if it has to
pay for expenses associated to selling the property that has
been used as collateral such as
legal fees, realtor commissionsCommissions What you
pay to a broker or agent
for their
services.
The only way a attorney referral
service can receive compensation
is a flat fee per a lead, no matter if it produces
legal fees or not
for the attorney and the amount
paid can not
be in direct relation to the amount of
legal fees collected.
If you talk to a lawyer and your lawyer says not to do anything, don't
pay back your loans «get your lawyer to put that in writing
for you»!!!! There
is a
legal opinion from Charles Rotenberg stating that these
are real loans and they need to
be serviced.
Under the Investment Management Agreements, the Manager
is responsible
for paying all of the Funds» expenses including expenses
for the following
services: transfer agency, fund accounting, fund administration, custody,
legal, audit, compliance, directors» fees, call center, fulfillment, travel, insurance, rent, printing, postage, and other office supplies, except
for commissions, brokerage fees, and other transaction costs, taxes, interest, litigation expenses, and related expenses, and other extraordinary expenses.
Chris Kesterson and the workers at Debt Settlement America, if you truly want to help the people in these three examples, please
pay for them to go bankrupt, give them a
legal fresh start and leave them in a safer place than where they
are right now, struggling to save money
for your monthly
services fees, that you will continue to charge them, and to
pay you a big percentage of their debts as a settlement fee.
These
are «self - assessments,» meaning the businesses agreed, through a
legal mechanism, to assess themselves to
pay for certain
services that would benefit their businesses.
North Carolina quickly put the kibosh on plans
for advertising
legal services on Groupon, stating in a proposed ethics opinion that the site's fee «
is a percentage of the amount actually
paid to the lawyer and appears to constitute revenue sharing with a nonlawyer.»
I
was puzzled when I recently watched an ad
for Pay - Day - Loan (or the like) that in the disclaimer specifically mentioned that they didn't provide their
service in New York due to
legal limits on interest rates.
Who
is to
pay for these
legal services?
Generally, a contract attorney
is employed by a
legal services agency to work on large - scale projects
for an hourly wage
paid by the agency.
Lawyers should consider unbundling or limited scope retainers as there
are opportunities to help large numbers of clients who can
pay for help on a part of their matter (visit practicepro.ca / limitedscope)
for tools and resources to help you provide limited scope
services), but unbundled
services can only chip away at part of the unmet
legal needs problem.
Today, it
is the client that decides the price that will
be paid for legal services.
For many years, the profession has
been talking about alternative billing schemes such as flat fees, unbundled
legal services, and
pay - what - it
's - worth options.
Access problems in our country
are well - documented but when even medium - to - high income people
are avoiding lawyers the problem
is clearly larger than
legal services for those who can't
pay for them.
The new comment says it
's OK to
pay for «lead generation»
services, provided the generator doesn't vouch
for the lawyer
's credentials or abilities, or create the impression that it has chosen the lawyer by analyzing the potential client
's legal problems, or pretend that the recommendation
is being made gratis.
http://www.slaw.ca/2016/08/09/a2j-unaffordable-
legal-
services-concepts-and-solutions/ We must change law societies» management structure substantially, or get rid of them, or go on serving out the rest of our careers in a very seriously depressed profession — a profession that
is rapidly losing its size, power, purpose, and prestige to, inter alia, the commercial world of LegalX and LegalZoom, and to law society - sponsored «alternative
legal services,» which
are charity instead of affordable lawyers provided in exchange
for that majority's
paying for the justice system whereat benchers earn a very good living.
How did they know that otherwise self - represented litigants would
pay for the
services of a limited license
legal technician when they
were not willing to
pay for the
services of an attorney?
To establish an attorney / client relationship, individuals and organizations will
be required to sign an Agreement
for Legal Services and
pay applicable fees.
Clients will
be paying more, not less,
for top
legal services, with a combination of factors — bank pressure, the «IBM factor» and simple need
for expertise — creating what amounts to a complex cartel among the large firms.
Is the only legitimate use of an alternative structure to provide free
legal services to those who can not
pay for them at all?
It
is different from its competitors in the personal injury
legal services market in two manners: (i) it does not deduct fees from its clients» compensation awards (instead Aspire Law's fees
are paid solely by the insurer that recorded the accident), and (ii) half of the profits earned by Aspire Law
are paid to Aspire, the charity, which uses it to provide support, funding and housing
for persons with spinal cord injuries.
We appreciate that
legal expertise can
be needed
for big and small commercial projects or personal life changes, which
is why we offer tailored packages or
pay - as - you - go
services that boast affordable fees.
The second level of response to the argument
is this: alternative structures offer the means to provide free
legal services to those who can not
pay for them at all.
Or
is the only legitimate use of an alternative structure to provide free
legal services to those who can not
pay for them at all?
Some argue that alternative structures can
be used only to provide
legal services for payment — that they
are of no use
for providing free
legal services to clients who
are unable to
pay.
This population includes people who
are so poor that they can not afford to
pay anything
for legal services, but it also includes the middle class, as well as start - ups and small and medium - sized businesses.
Yet buyers of
legal services are becoming more sophisticated, and less willing to
pay for inefficient processes that translate into higher fees.
When this situation
is declared unconstitutional, that will provide the basis
for making law societies
pay for the
legal services that people can not afford (except for Legal Aid's very limited availabil
legal services that people can not afford (except
for Legal Aid's very limited availabil
Legal Aid's very limited availability).
Other
legal services require customers to
pay by the hour and take time out of their days
for a call — Micro
is the first to charge a flat rate per question that can
be asked and answered online.
We
're also thrilled to
be a North Star Lawyer — an award presented by the Minnesota State Bar Association to lawyers who provide over 50 hours of pro bono
legal services to those who can not afford to
pay a lawyer
for legal help.