Sentences with phrase «legal stuff taken»

Here's an example to illustrate I'm currently opening up a business and I'm in the middle of getting all the licensing copyright and legal stuff taken care of but I had 2 physical stores in a location close to me that are doing well enough to hire employees, so I don't need to be there anymore, but I'm also transitioning our entire store online so it has nothing to do with an «either / or» or an «instead of» and actually has to do with both.

Not exact matches

Always take care of the legal stuff first so other people can't rip you off.

The pre-requisite for that is taking care of the legal stuff.

The smell like someone jamming two large needles a good deal up into your nasal cavity and then taking them out and then jamming them back in the diaper had to be changed though so I learned along with the wonder and amazement of responsibility in the life of a little universe just learning about how wonderful and talented it is and all it had to do was be born and stuff just worked unless the cuts came but I did let that happen not when homosexuals could get married and marijuana was legal now to remove the guns and evangelicals and live in peace with the other people.

If we are too weak to quit using the stuff, we can at least make it legal, take responsibiity for our own actions and treat our weak willed addicts.

Let's just stick to the legal stuff (but the FINRA site «s fun to read... not that they ever get near the real baddies): Take another look at listed US REIT / MLPs (don't dare look at the unlisted stuff, you'd throw up!)

You have made this so much easier with your expertise, by taking the time to thoroughly explain «legal stuff» to me and always being so prompt and available.

Sam Glover: I need to take a couple of minutes to hear from our sponsors, and when we come back, I want to hear about some of the stuff you've been doing more recently that are kind of relevant to current events, but also overlap into this world of legal hacking and technology and programming.

Client comments as published in the legal directories and guides include: «A first - class mind and clearly a silk in the making»; «a QC in waiting»; «a very bright, uber - responsive, rising star»; «formidable advocate able to stand up to commercial silks and senior juniors»; «an extremely impressive and effective advocate who gets on top of things extremely fast and is quick on his feet»; «complete grasp of all current developments, strategic input and forceful yet polite cross-examination»; «undoubted star junior who goes well past the extra mile in preparing his cases»; «brilliant, completely committed to the brief; a great all - rounder»; «intellectually very strong»; «very sharp and to the point»; «ringing endorsements from the market»; «impressive and knows his stuff»; «razor sharp legal skills»; «comes up with extremely clever points» with an ability «to handle hearings with utmost self - possession and confidence and produce some first - class advocacy»; «a thorough and thoughtful advocate who has an agreeable but tough courtroom manner»; «very proactive and, once instructed, takes control of a case and pushes it forward to the advantage of the client»; «has the ability to sift through complex legal problems, and present practical legal solutions that not only win you the battles, but also the war»; «very commercial and savvy»; «infectious passion for the law»; «his commitment to his work is outstanding»; «relentless energy and precise attention to detail make him invaluable.»

Is it legal to stop somebody taking your stuff if you've left it somewhere?

Given where things stood 20 years ago — when virtually all legal writers stuffed their cumbersome citations mid-text and often mid-sentence — I'm delighted by how many courts have taken to

What AAI and other legal tech developments are taking over is «cognitive» work, or «reading stuff» to you and me.

Now, you don't have to be a genius or even a legal researcher, if that's not the same thing, to see that if you take out the search stuff

A witness who says so, may at least get the judge to comment on it, and a stubborn witness who takes legal duty as serious stuff, could conceivably respond that they can not answer it «yes / no».